Skip to content

· Private foundation

Whitney Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$578kArts & Culture$50kReligion$35kHuman Services$32kEducation$27kPhilanthropy$11k
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,750
Median grant
12
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TAMPA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS & FEDERATION$6,000
PASADO'S SAFE HAVEN$5,000
CHABAD CHAI OF SOUTH TAMPA$5,000
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$3,750
ANIMALS ANGELS USA$3,750
NOAHS LOST ARK EXOTIC ANIMAL RESCUE$3,750
FARM SANCTUARY INC$3,750
Individual grant recipient$3,750
JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE$3,750
MYLESTONE EQUINE RESCUE$3,750
SOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER$3,750
RETURN TO FREEDOM$3,750
WILDCAT SANCTUARY$3,750
REDWINGS HORSE SANCTUARY$3,750
JOYCE'S VOICES FOR CATS$3,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BIG CAT RESCUE: $5k → 13%BIG CAT RESCUE: $4k → 13%BIG CAT RESCUE: $4k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
WI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$711k · 23 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
5

Total granted

$711k
$23k

Still filing today

78%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PASADO'S SAFE HAVEN
    7× · 2019–2025 · $37k · revenue +109%
  • BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +31%
  • AA
    Animals' Angels Incorporated
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • TJ
    TAMPA JEWISH FEDERATION AND JCC INC
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • CL
    CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTH TAMPA
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • VM
    VIRGINIA MASON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
2
Martha's Farm Animal Sanctuary
Animals
3
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
4
Animal Ark Incorporated

Operate a nature center and wildlife sanctuary to provide educational programs for vistors, opportunities to aid in conversation efforts, and permanent care for the orphaned, confiscated, and non-releaseable wildlife that do not have the…

Animals
5
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
6
Woodstock Farm Animal Sanctuary Inc

We seek to end animal agriculture by rescuing farmed animals, giving them lifelong care and sanctuary, and educating about the harms of animal farming.

Animals
7
Saving Saluda Strays
Animals
8
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
9
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
10
Bella View Farm Animal Sanctuary Inc
Animals
11
Forever Wild Wildlife Rescue
Animals
12
J-Lo's Animal Rescue & Sanctuary in

Animal care and rescue

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Defenders of Animal Rights Inc; the most unlike its peers is Northwood Education Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PASADO'S SAFE HAVEN: $37,106 · AnimalsPASADO'S SAFE HAVENBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $36,350 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETYAnimals' Angels Incorporated: $36,350 · AnimalsAnimals' Angels IncorporatedTHE WILDCAT SANCTUARY: $36,350 · AnimalsTHE WILDCAT SANCTUARYFARM SANCTUARY INC: $36,350 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INCJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $36,350 · AnimalsJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERV…DEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC: $36,350 · AnimalsDEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INCHORSEPOWER SANCTUARIES INC DBA REDWINGS HORSE SANCTUARY: $36,350 · AnimalsHORSEPOWER SANCTUARIES INC DBA REDWINGS HORSE SANCTUARYRETURN TO FREEDOM INC: $36,350 · AnimalsRETURN TO FREEDOM INCMYLESTONE EQUINE RESCUE: $35,350 · AnimalsMYLESTONE EQUINE RESCUENOAH'S LOST ARK INC: $35,350 · AnimalsNOAH'S LOST ARK INCSOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $31,350 · AnimalsSOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INCCASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC: $36,350 · OtherCASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INCJOYCES VOICE FOR CATS: $36,350 · OtherJOYCES VOICE FOR CATSIndividual grant recipient: $35,350 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTAMPA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS & FEDERATION: $32,100 · OtherTAMPA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS & FE…CHABAD CHAI OF SOUTH TAMPA: $30,000 · OtherCHABAD CHAI OF SOUTH TAMPAPAWS: $23,400 · OtherPAWSTAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $16,500 · OtherTAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER IN…+5 more: $22,600 · Other+5 moreFLORIDA HOLOCAUST MUSEUM INC: $24,930 · Arts & CultureRUTH ECKERD HALL INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $24,300 · EducationBIG CAT RESCUE CORP: $13,000 · Human Services
Animals$429,956Other$232,650Arts & Culture$33,930Education$24,300Human Services$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPASADO'S SAFE HAVEN: $37,106 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $36,350 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAnimals' Angels Incorporated: $36,350 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetTHE WILDCAT SANCTUARY: $36,350 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC: $36,350 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $36,350 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $36,350 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC: $36,350 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHORSEPOWER SANCTUARIES INC DBA REDWINGS HORSE SANCTUARY: $36,350 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetRETURN TO FREEDOM INC: $36,350 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMYLESTONE EQUINE RESCUE: $35,350 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetNOAH'S LOST ARK INC: $35,350 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $31,350 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFLORIDA HOLOCAUST MUSEUM INC: $24,930 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $24,300 over 8y, 7.0% of budgetTAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $16,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIG CAT RESCUE CORP: $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRUTH ECKERD HALL INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PASADO'S SAFE HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Animals' Angels Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDCAT SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds CASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds DEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds HORSEPOWER SANCTUARIES INC DBA REDWINGS HORSE SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds RETURN TO FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds MYLESTONE EQUINE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds NOAH'S LOST ARK INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA HOLOCAUST MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG CAT RESCUE CORP ↗
  • Who funds RUTH ECKERD HALL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paula Knickerbocker Foundation IncID15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paula Knickerbocker Foundation Inc · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The J R Stein Family Foundation (F/K/A the Stein Family Fund) · Joyce a Ward Foundation · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Bradford Family Foundation · The John a Rodger Jr Foundation Inc · Top Jewish Foundation Inc · Farrell Family Foundation · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Whitney Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Whitney Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Florida Holocaust Museum Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Whitney Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Whitney Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Whitney’s filings →

More from the funding graph