Skip to content
Whitman Family Foundation Co Northpoint Financial at a glance

· Private foundation

Whitman Family Foundation Co Northpoint Financial

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$268k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$322kHousing & Shelter$167kEducation$139kInternational$85kHuman Services$48kCivil Rights$45kSocial Science$41kEnvironment$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW ENGLAND DEACONESS ASSOCIATION$250,000
NEW ENGLAND DEACONESS ASSOCIATION$10,000
MIDNIGHT MISSION$5,317
THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $192k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE: $8k → 9%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 9%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $1k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES I: $11k → 14%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%PINE STREET INN: $35k → 16%THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE: $4k → 9%PINE STREET INN: $30k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES I: $6k → 14%PINE STREET INN: $30k → 16%THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE: $4k → 9%PINE STREET INN: $22k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES I: $4k → 14%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE: $3k → 9%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $5k → 14%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%FREEDOM NETWORK USA: $5k → 14%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $4k → 16%FREEDOM NETWORK USA: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
NM
TN
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$692k · 50 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

50 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 50 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
37

Total granted

$692k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
0%

Still filing today

86%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $268k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PINE STREET INN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $127k · revenue +36%
  • BUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS SCHOOL
    3× · 2020–2022 · $112k · revenue +31%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $39k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • UO
    University of Michigangraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
Aclu Foundation of Massachusetts Inc

Aclu foundation of ma was established to defend freedoms guaranteed in the constitution and bill of rights through public education and litigation.

Civil Rights
12
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social Science Research Council; the most unlike its peers is African Sky Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
68/68
Grantees still filing
45/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW ENGLAND DEACONESS ASSOCIATION: $260,000 · HealthNEW ENGLAND DEACONESS ASSOCIATIO…YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL: $20,000 · HealthYALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL+6 more: $8,710 · HealthPINE STREET INN INC: $127,000 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $20,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF…THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC: $19,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY…FREEDOM NETWORK USA INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $6,500 · Human Services+4 more: $11,817 · Human Services+4 moreBUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS SCHOOL: $112,000 · EducationBUCKINGHAM BRO…Fairfield University: $11,000 · EducationFairfield Univ…+7 more: $8,350 · Education+7 morePROJECT ACCESS - NEW HAVEN: $11,000 · OtherAMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS SCIENCES: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIO…COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $12,000 · OtherNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $9,500 · OtherTEAM RUBICON INC: $27,000 · OtherTEAM RUBICON INCPRO PUBLICA INC: $15,500 · OtherPRO PUBLICA INCINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY - LOUIS BAMBERGER & MRS FELIX FULD FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY …BURROUGHS COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $20,000 · OtherBURROUGHS COMMUNITY CENTER IN…THE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $11,000 · Other+42 more: $101,409 · Other+42 moreSave The Children Federation Inc: $39,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,500 · InternationalPOLARIS PROJECT: $2,500 · InternationalAFRICAN SKY INC: $2,000 · International+1 more: $1,030 · InternationalOPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC: $16,000 · Housing & ShelterCOLUMBUS HOUSE INC: $11,000 · Housing & ShelterALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $4,500 · Housing & ShelterDEACONESS ABUNDANT LIFE COMMUNITIES: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterSHELTERCARE: $3,500 · Housing & ShelterSolid Ground Washington: $3,500 · Housing & ShelterSALZBURG GLOBAL SEMINAR INC: $31,000 · Social ScienceSOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL: $10,000 · Social Science
Health$288,710Human Services$191,817Education$131,350Other$267,409International$50,030Housing & Shelter$42,500Social Science$41,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $127,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS SCHOOL: $112,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $39,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSALZBURG GLOBAL SEMINAR INC: $31,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $27,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $20,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBURROUGHS COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $20,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY - LOUIS BAMBERGER & MRS FELIX FULD FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC: $19,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $15,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBUS HOUSE INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFairfield University: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT LAKES PERFORMING ARTIST ASSOCIATES: $8,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetFeeding America: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIKES NOT BOMBS INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM NETWORK USA INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRainforest Action Network: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $5,317 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY STUDY INSTITUTE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDEACONESS ABUNDANT LIFE COMMUNITIES: $4,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERCARE: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN LAW RESOURCE CENTER: $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSolid Ground Washington: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABORTION CARE NETWORK: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEMERSON HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAREHAM LAND TRUST INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN SKY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION SOUTHCOAST INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Robert Wood Johns…Ibm International Fou…Eastern Bank Foundati…National Philanthropi…WK Kellogg FoundationBoston Foundation IncThe Ayco Charitable F…The Pfizer Foundation…AbbVie FoundationGe Aerospace Foundati…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…
The Robert Wood Johnson FoundationNJ13.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · WK Kellogg Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Whitman Family Foundation Co Northpoint Financial funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Whitman Family Foundation Co Northpoint Financial. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Columbus House Inc: 100% of income from government
  • The Center for Family Justice Inc: 49% of income from government
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Wareham Land Trust Inc: 27% of income from government
  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Boston Area Gleaners Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Sheltercare: 18% of income from government
  • Operation Hope of Fairfield Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation: 7% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • New England Deaconess Association: 6% of income from government
  • Concord Chamber Music Society Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Bikes Not Bombs Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Yale New Haven Hospital: 0% of income from government
  • Buckingham Browne & Nichols School: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Whitman Family Foundation Co Northpoint Financial’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home