Skip to content
White Family Supporting Foundation at a glance

· Public charity

White Family Supporting Foundation

The organization is designed to provide support for other charitable organizations, as described in sections 501(c) and 509(a) of the internal revenue code.

$265k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$418kPhilanthropy$306kCommunity Improvement$105kHealth$95kReligion$89kCivil Rights$53kEducation$53kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $250,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $265,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $135k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS)$85,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$50,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$30,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS BUREAU$20,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$15,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$10,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$10,000
KANSAS CITY MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC$10,000
HYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY$10,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $540k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Jewish Family Services: $20k → 5%Jewish Family Services: $15k → 5%Jewish Family Services: $12k → 5%Village Shalom Inc: $10k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $85k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $48k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $25k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $20k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $20k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $20k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $20k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $20k → 5%Jewish Family Services (JFS): $20k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $20k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $20k → 5%Jewish Family Services (JFS): $18k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $18k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $18k → 5%Jewish Family Services (JFS): $18k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $18k → 5%Jewish Family Services (JFS): $16k → 5%Jewish Family Services (JFS): $15k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $15k → 5%Jewish Family Services (JFS): $12k → 5%Jewish Community Campus: $10k → 5%Jewish Family Services (JFS): $8k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$972k · 9 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$972k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+51%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CulturePhilanthropyCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $520k · revenue +86%
  • JV
    JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE BUREAU OF KANSAS CITY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $103k · revenue +227%
  • NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED
    8× · 2018–2025 · $80k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • TE
    THE EPSTEN GALLERY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $18k · revenue -50%
  • HT
    HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFEgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +34%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CAMPUS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +57%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mid-Kansas Jewish Federation Inc

Build, strengthen, and preserve jewish identity within the local community, in israel, and around the world through tzedakah, education, and cultural events.

Religion
2
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
3
Jewish Federation of Nashville and Middle Tennessee

The jewish federation of nashville is the central voluntary communal organization of the jewish community. through its fund-raising, planning and community relations efforts, either independently or in partnership with other jewish…

Philanthropy
4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
5
Jewish Community Centers Association of North America

Jcc association strengthens jewish life in north america through direct service to affiliate jccs, ym-ywha's and camps and by providing leadership and guidance to the jcc movement. in addition, we serve jewish personnel in the armed forces…

Human Services
6
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
7
Jewish Coalition for Immigrant Justice Northwest

The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.

Human Services
8
Jewish Community Relations Council

The jewish community relations council (jcrc) works within the jewish and broader communities in st. louis to enhance cooperation with other religious, racial, ethnic and civic groups; foster a just, democratic and pluralistic society; and…

Community Improvement
9
Jewish Community Center of Nashville

The gordon jewish community center welcomes all, builds community, and provides excellent programs rooted in jewish values to enrich the mind, body, and spirit.

Human Services
10
Jewish Federation of Omaha Inc

To build and sustain a strong and vibrant omaha jewish community and to support jews in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
11
Jewish Childrens Museum

To further jewish historical education among youths

Arts & Culture
12
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Kansas City; the most unlike its peers is The Epsten Gallery Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $520,010 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES+2 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $256,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CI…JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $165,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $78,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KAN…JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE BUREAU OF KANSAS CITY: $103,000 · OtherJEWISH VOCATIONA…Congregation Beth Shalom: $60,000 · OtherCongregation Bet…CONGREGATION KOL AMI INC: $20,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KOL…THE EPSTEN GALLERY FOUNDATION: $18,000 · OtherTHE EPSTEN GALLE…HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $15,000 · OtherHILLEL THE FOUND…NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $80,000 · Community ImprovementAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC: $21,000 · Community ImprovementJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS BUREAU INC: $62,000 · Civil RightsHYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY: $27,500 · EducationKANSAS CITY MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST FILM FORUM: $8,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$540,010Philanthropy$499,000Other$216,000Community Improvement$101,000Civil Rights$62,000Education$27,500Arts & Culture$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $520,010 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $256,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $165,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE BUREAU OF KANSAS CITY: $103,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $80,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $78,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS BUREAU INC: $62,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetHYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY: $27,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC: $21,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE EPSTEN GALLERY FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $15,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CAMPUS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVILLAGE SHALOM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS CITY MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST FILM FORUM: $8,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Jewish Community Foun…
Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas CityKS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization White Family Supporting Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from White Family Supporting Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to White Family Supporting Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to White Family Supporting Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on White Family Supporting’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home