· Private foundation
Wheaton Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $192k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $426k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ETERNAL LIGHT MINISTRIES | $726,271 |
| CLUB 1040 PROJECT LEBANON | $480,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $463,605 |
| Individual grant recipient | $130,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $99,840 |
| FAITHFUL FEW MINISTRIES | $84,000 |
| SOUL PURPOSE MINISTRIES | $60,000 |
| FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES | $52,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $48,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $36,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE GLOBAL MINISTRIES | $35,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,000 |
| SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN SERVICES | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 42% of grant dollars ($4.3M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 58% that went abroad ($5.8M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 58% of all-years giving ($5.8M)
9 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $825k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ELETERNAL LIGHT MINISTRIES5× · 2020–2024 · $2.4M
- IGIndividual grant recipient5× · 2020–2024 · $2.4M
- C1CLUB 10404× · 2020–2023 · $1.1M
Funded once
- LMLACKEY MINISTRIESone grant, 2020 · $210k
- RLREVOLUTIONARY LIFE HASTEN MINISTRIEone grant, 2020 · $90k
- ESEDUCATION SERVICES M TAYLORone grant, 2023 · $77k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ministry - teaching ministry
To provide religious and educational programming to meet the needs of the membership and supporters of the network.
In Christ Ministries exists to bring the message of Gods love grace and truth to children teens and adults. We do this through training and outreach events.
The nbsp;mission nbsp;of nbsp;bmi nbsp;is nbsp;to nbsp;train nbsp;pastors nbsp;and nbsp;christian nbsp;leaders nbsp;throughout nbsp;the nbsp;world nbsp;to nbsp;impact nbsp;their nbsp;nation nbsp;for nbsp;christ
M28 ministries, inc. is a christian 501c3 non-profit organization that exists to teach youth and adults about christian discipleship in the manner of matthew 28:19-20, "go into all of the world teaching, preaching, and baptizing in the…
Sharing biblical principles
The mission of son valley is to build and operate a quality christian community for adults with intellectual disabilities, ministering to their physical, spiritual, mental, vocational and recreational needs.
Christian publishing company
Teaching and Spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
To serve christian ministries and individuals in their pursuit of a christian education.
To assist individuals whom are "down and out- and to spread the gospel of jesus christ through evangelistic means by distributing literature.
God's bible school and college seeks to glorify god and to serve his church by providing higher education centered in holy scripture and shaped by wesleyan conviction, thus preparing faithful servants to proclaim jesus christ and spread…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christians in Action Inc and the most unlike its peers is Living Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: His Way Inc · Ergon Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wheaton Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Wheaton Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Wheaton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.