Skip to content

· Private foundation

Weyco Group Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$307k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$376kEducation$249kYouth Development$123kInternational$80kHealth$79kFood & Nutrition$69kHuman Services$54kCommunity Improvement$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $108k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $199k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$658k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$42,814
TWO TEN INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$40,000
UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND$25,000
UWM FOUNDATION$20,000
MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART AND DESI$15,300
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM$14,333
MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOO$12,000
MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM$10,000
GREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION$10,000
DR HOWARD FULLER COLLEGIATE ACADEMY$10,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA MILWAUKEE$8,800
COLLEGE POSSIBLE MILWAUKEE$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
CHILDREN'S WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$6,000
FIRST STAGE CHILDREN'S THEATRE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 17%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MILWAUKEE: $8k → 17%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MILWAUKEE: $6k → 17%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MILWAUKEE: $3k → 17%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MILWAUKEE: $3k → 17%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MILWAUKEE: $1k → 17%DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF WI: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
MO
VA
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 47 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
28

Total granted

$1.2M
$168k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
0%

Still filing today

60%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +12%
  • FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $66k · revenue +56%
  • MA
    MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • TT
    TWO TEN INTERNATIONAL FOOTWEAR FOUN
    one grant, 2024 · $37k
  • TT
    TWO TEN INERNATIONAL FOOTWEAR FOUND
    one grant, 2023 · $36k
  • TT
    TWO TEN FOOTWEAR FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
2
Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce

Improve metro milwaukee as a place to create jobs, invest capital and grow business.

—
3
Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

—
4
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

—
5
Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee Inc

To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.

—
6
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
7
Milwaukee Development Corporation

-instigate, implement, participate in and promote such activities as shall, in the judgment of mdc, tend to support the general community interest in a strong, vital, aesthetically exciting and economically viable greater milwaukee…

Community Improvement
8
Milwaukee Water Commons Inc

Milwaukee water commons is helping catalyze milwaukee as a true model water city-a place where we all have a stake in the health of our waters and all share in their stewardship and benefits. we are advancing our community envisioned water…

Environment
9
Water Council Inc

To align the regional fresh water research community and water-related industries to establish the milwaukee 7 region as the global capital for fresh water research and education, through the advancement of scientific collaboration on…

Science & Tech
10
Employ Milwaukee Inc

The mission of employ milwaukee, inc. is to build a strong workforce development system by planning, coordinating, collaborating and monitoring workforce initiatives with businesses, partners and community stakeholders at the local,…

Employment
11
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
12
Central City Cyberschool of Milwaukee Inc

A charter school providing motivation to inner city children to promote a successful future

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Forward Collective Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/52
Grantees still filing
30/52
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $249,088 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC: $120,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INCMILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOO: $57,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOTWO TEN INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $37,500 · OtherTWO TEN INTERNATIONAL FOOTWEAR FOUN: $37,000 · OtherTWO TEN INERNATIONAL FOOTWEAR FOUND: $36,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $31,000 · Other+49 more: $315,228 · Other+49 moreUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $122,774 · Arts & CultureUNITED PERFORMING …MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $47,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSE…MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $25,833 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC M…SCULPTURE MILWAUKEE INC: $13,000 · Arts & CultureSCULPTURE MILWAUKE…MILWAUKEE FILM INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC: $9,750 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $5,500 · Arts & CultureCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $45,000 · EducationCOLLEGE PO…DR HOWARD FULLER COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INC: $35,000 · EducationDR HOWARD …THE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationTHE UWM FO…THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $15,000 · EducationTHE MEDICA…WALLIN EDUCATION PARTNERS: $10,000 · EducationWALLIN EDU…Marquette University: $5,000 · Education+4 more: $10,400 · Education+4 moreFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $66,418 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $1,000 · Food & NutritionTWO TEN FOOTWEAR FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $1,000 · Community ImprovementYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Milwaukee Inc: $19,500 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2,000 · Human Services+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesRUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $18,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentFuture Urban Leaders: $5,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $500 · Youth Development
Other$922,816Arts & Culture$233,857Education$140,400Food & Nutrition$67,418Community Improvement$36,000Human Services$34,250Youth Development$31,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $122,774 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $66,418 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $47,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDR HOWARD FULLER COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTWO TEN FOOTWEAR FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $25,833 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Milwaukee Inc: $19,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetSCULPTURE MILWAUKEE INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE FILM INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN CONSERVATION VOICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWALLIN EDUCATION PARTNERS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC: $9,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $9,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETA HOUSE INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL YOUTH LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetFuture Urban Leaders: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFASHION SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOJOURNER FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRADIO MILWAUKEE INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR DEAF-BLIND PERSONS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PARENTING NETWORK INC: $2,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDESSA SCHOOL OF FASHION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetMILWAUKEE WOMEN INC: $2,400 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBLACK ARTS MKE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEMPO Milwaukee Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEAR WEST SIDE PARTNERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEENS GROW GREENS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTARS AND STRIPES HONOR FLIGHT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICE CLUB OF MILWAUKEE INC: $500 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
  • Who funds DR HOWARD FULLER COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds TWO TEN FOOTWEAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UWM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Milwaukee Inc ↗
  • Who funds RUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Greater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SCULPTURE MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE FILM INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN CONSERVATION VOICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WALLIN EDUCATION PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds FLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds META HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert H Kohl Charities IncWI42.8× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Peck Foundation Milwaukee Ltd · Gardner Foundation · Richard and Ethel Herzfeld Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weyco Group Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weyco Group Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Weyco Group Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Weyco Group Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Weyco Group’s filings →

    More from the funding graph