Skip to content

· Private foundation

Weston F Jr and Dorothy C Conley Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$41kArts & Culture$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kEducation$3kYouth Development$1kHuman Services$900Animals$700Food & Nutrition$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
1
States reached
$153k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMMANUEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$3,500
NORWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH$3,000
MORATTICO WATERFRONT MUSEUM$500
Individual grant recipient$200
UPPER LANCASTER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$200
UPPER LANCASTER VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD$200
TIDEWATER FOUNDATION$100
HEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK$100
BOY AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN NECK$100
NORTHERN NECK FREE HEALTH CLINIC$100
RIVER COUNTIES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100
NORTHERN NECK PARTNERS FOR PETS$100
ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF THE NORTHERN NECK$100
FRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK$100
FRIENDS IN BELLE ISLE$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 3% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%YMCA: $300 → 13%NORTHERN NECK PARTNERS FOR PETS: $100 → 14%FRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK: $100 → 15%RCC EFI: $200 → 16%TIDEWATER FOUNDATION: $100 → 13%NORTHERN NECK PARTNERS FOR PETS: $100 → 14%FRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK: $100 → 15%HEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK: $100 → 16%BOY AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN NECK: $100 → 13%NORTHERN NECK PARTNERS FOR PETS: $100 → 14%FRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK: $100 → 15%RCC EFI: $100 → 16%NORTHERN NECK FREE HEALTH CLINIC: $100 → 13%NORTHERN NECK PARTNERS FOR PETS: $100 → 14%FRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK: $100 → 15%RCC EFI: $100 → 16%TIDEWATER FOUNDATION: $100 → 13%NORTHERN NECK PARTNERS FOR PETS: $100 → 14%RCC EFI: $100 → 16%TIDEWATER FOUNDATION: $100 → 13%NORTHERN NECK PARTNERS FOR PETS: $100 → 14%RCC EFI: $100 → 16%BOY AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN NECK: $100 → 13%RIVER COUNTIES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%RIVER COUNTIES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $400 → 14%NORWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 14%NORWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 14%NORWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 14%NORWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 14%NORWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 14%NORWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 14%NORWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 14%UPPER LANCASTER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $200 → 14%UPPER LANCASTER VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD: $200 → 14%UPPER LANCASTER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $200 → 14%UPPER LANCASTER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $200 → 14%RIVER ROAD FOOD PANTRY: $200 → 14%UPPER LANCASTER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $200 → 14%UPPER LANCASTER VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD: $200 → 14%UPPER LANCASTER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $200 → 14%UPPER LANCASTER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $200 → 14%UPPER LANCASTER VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD: $200 → 14%UPPER LANCASTER VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD: $200 → 14%NORWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH CEMETERY FUND: $200 → 14%FRIENDS IN BELLE ISLE: $200 → 14%FRIENDS IN BELLE ISLE: $200 → 14%UPPER LANCASTER VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD: $200 → 14%UPPER LANCASTER VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$66k · 17 repeat orgs$400 to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -65% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$66k
$200

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-65%

Still filing today

35%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthEnvironmentHousing & ShelterArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MW
    Morattico Waterfront Museum
    8× · 2018–2025 · $15k · revenue +15%
  • UL
    Upper Lancaster Volunteer Fire Dept
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1k · revenue +19%
  • LP
    Lancova Partners for Pets Inc
    6× · 2019–2025 · $600 · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HAVEN INC
    one grant, 2019 · $100 · revenue -65%
  • UL
    UPPER LANCASTER COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2021 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern Shore Spca

Care and placement of unwanted animals on the eastern shore of virginia servicing accomack and northampton counties. providing temporary lodging and care to animals until placed while encouraging spaying and neutering.

Animals
2
Rappahannock Animal Welfare League

Prevention of cruelty to animals(canines) through operation of no-kill shelter

Animals
3
Old Dominion Humane Society

Old Dominion Humane Society provides well-matched, permanent homes for dogs in need through rescue, rehabilitation, and education.

Animals
4
Chesapeake Cats & Dogs Inc

Chesapeake Cats and Dogs CCAD is a lifetime haven and no-kill animal rescue organization dedicated to rehabilitating and providing a second chance for cats and dogs that have been abandoned, abused, lost, strayed, or surrendered.

Animals
5
Dolphin Volunteer Fire Department

Fire protection services for dolphin, va and surrounding communities

—
6
Burkeville Volunteer Fire Department

The organization provides emergency, medical, and fire fighting services to the citizens in and around the Burkeville, Virginia area.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Southside Rescue Squad Inc

Emergency medical treatment

Health
8
South End Fire Company

To provide fire protection in the winchester, va area.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Arnoldsburg Volunteer Fire Department

Provide firefighter services for Arnoldsburg and surrounding communties

Public Safety & Disaster
10
New Martinsville Volunteer Fire Dept

To protect property and lives of our community.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
North Franklin Township Volunteer Fire Company

Volunteer Fire Company

Public Safety & Disaster
12
East Albany Animal Clinic

Provide low cost spay & neuter program, preventive care to needy pet owners.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy Harvest Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Upper Lancaster Volunteer Fire Dept. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EMMANUEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20,750 · OtherEMMANUEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCHNORWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $20,250 · OtherNORWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH+12 more: $8,000 · Other+12 moreMorattico Waterfront Museum: $15,300 · Arts & CultureMorattico Waterfront Museu…Lancova Partners for Pets Inc: $600 · AnimalsTHE ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF THE NORTHERN NECK INC: $100 · AnimalsTHE NORTHERN NECK-MIDDLESEX FREE HEALTH CLINIC INC: $400 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK: $400 · EnvironmentTHE HAVEN INC: $100 · Housing & ShelterHEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $100 · Food & Nutrition
Other$49,000Arts & Culture$15,300Animals$700Health$400Environment$400Housing & Shelter$100Food & Nutrition$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMorattico Waterfront Museum: $15,300 over 8y, 13% of budgetUpper Lancaster Volunteer Fire Dept: $1,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLancova Partners for Pets Inc: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TIDEWATER FOUNDATION INC: $600 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE NORTHERN NECK-MIDDLESEX FREE HEALTH CLINIC INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF THE NORTHERN NECK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAVEN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Morattico Waterfront Museum ↗
  • Who funds Upper Lancaster Volunteer Fire Dept ↗
  • Who funds Lancova Partners for Pets Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE TIDEWATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NORTHERN NECK-MIDDLESEX FREE HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK ↗
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF THE NORTHERN NECK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Mason and Lula Cole Charitable Tua 600008015 · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weston F Jr and Dorothy C Conley Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weston F Jr and Dorothy C Conley Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Weston F Jr and Dorothy C Conley Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph