Skip to content

· Public charity

Westmoreland Drug & Alcohol Commission

The mission of westmoreland drug and alcohol commission, inc.

$4.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$31MHuman Services$1.1MEducation$644kScience & Tech$633kYouth Development$346kHousing & Shelter$337kEmployment$277k
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $324k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.3M
$55,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL CARE INC$1,316,839
ST VINCENT PREVENTION PROGRAM$1,128,908
PITTSBURGH POISON CENTER OF UPMC$500,000
GATEWAY REHABILITATION CENTER$351,029
SPHS MONESSEN FAMILY CENTER$220,383
PENN HIGHLANDS MON VALLEY$203,271
PYRAMID HEALTHCARE$122,388
DAVIS ARCHWAY TREATMENT$111,904
WHITE DEER RUNCOVE FORGE$104,059
WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES$96,440
RHJ MEDICAL CENTER INC$75,092
MEDMARK$66,190
GLENBEIGH$59,215
COLLECTIVE HEALTH CONSULTING$55,000
ALLIED ADDICTION$48,924
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $7.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL CARE INC: $1.4M → 10%ASCEND CLINICAL: $36k → 11%SOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL CARE INC: $1.3M → 10%SOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL CARE INC: $1.3M → 10%SOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL CARE INC: $1.3M → 10%SOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL CARE INC: $1.2M → 10%WESTMORELAND COMMUNITY ACTION: $201k → 10%SPHS MONESSEN FAMILY CENTER (SOUTHWEST BEHAVORIAL CARE INC): $26k → 12%WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $121k → 10%SPHS MONESSEN FAMILY CENTER (SOUTHWEST BEHAVORIAL CARE INC): $22k → 12%WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $113k → 10%WESTMORELAND COMMUNITY ACTION: $112k → 10%WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $96k → 10%WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $82k → 10%WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $55k → 10%WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $51k → 10%OUTSIDE IN: $49k → 10%OUTSIDE IN: $44k → 10%OUTSIDE IN: $44k → 10%OUTSIDE IN: $36k → 10%OUTSIDE IN: $22k → 10%OUTSIDE IN: $9k → 10%OUTSIDE IN: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34M · 44 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
8

Total granted

$34M
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+41%

Still filing today

39%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8.4M · revenue +19%
  • WH
    WESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $6.8M · revenue +76%
  • U
    UPMC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $28k
  • AL
    ANGEL'S LIGHT
    one grant, 2022 · $26k
  • AF
    AXIOM FAMILY COUNSELING
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
2
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
3
Gosnold Inc

Gosnold, inc. was established for the rehabilitation of substance abusers and offers addiction and mental health treatment on an in-patient and out-patient basis.

—
4
Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute

Ppi is operated solely by penn state health and is dedicated to providing exceptional clinical care, advancing diverse educational opportunities for the next generation of behavioral health specialists, fostering impactful research, and…

Health
5
Cornerstone Montgomery

Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.

—
6
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
7
Mercy Life Center Corporation

We, pittsburgh mercy health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy life center is a member of pittsburgh mercy health system…

Health
8
Washington Drug & Alcohol Commission

To enrich the quality of life for persons who have experienced problems related to the use or abuse of alcohol and other drugs. this organization will ensure that clients receive the appropriate level of drug/alcohol treatment, while…

Health
9
Penn State Health

Penn state health's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people of pennsylvania, and beyond. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and equitable care; educates and trains (continued…

Health
10
Berks Counseling Center Inc

Berks counseling center (bcc) is a recovery oriented certified community behavioral health center (ccbhc) with an integrated behavioral and physical health model of service delivery. the center provides a holistic approach to a culturally…

Health
11
Hamilton Center Inc

Hamilton center exists to provide quality behavioral healthcare, wellness, and human development services to our community.

Health
12
Upmc Williamsport

UPMC Williamsport is a subsidiary of UPMC Susquehanna. The mission of UPMC Susquehanna and its subsidiaries is to serve the community by providing outstanding patient care and shaping tomorrow's health care through clinical and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southwest Behavioral Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Oxford House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL CARE INC: $4,945,549 · HealthSOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL CARE INCUPMC: $2,875,000 · HealthUPMCGATEWAY REHABILITATION CENTER: $1,767,101 · HealthGATEWAY REHABILITATION CENTERUPMC Center for High-Value Healthcare: $546,327 · HealthSPIRITLIFE INC: $467,525 · Health+6 more: $592,719 · HealthSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $8,387,382 · EducationSAINT VINCENT COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $1,276,521 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHWESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC: $6,846,979 · Human ServicesWESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORT…WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $519,369 · Human ServicesWESLEY FAMILY SERVICES+2 more: $248,868 · Human ServicesCLEAR DAY TREATMENT OF WESTMORELAND: $582,346 · OtherCLEAR DAY TREATM…DAVIS ARCHWAY TREATMENT: $531,558 · OtherDAVIS ARCHWAY TR…PYRAMID HEALTHCARE: $510,707 · OtherPYRAMID HEALTHCA…WHITE DEER RUN: $328,305 · OtherWHITE DEER RUNRHJ MEDICAL CENTER INC: $291,043 · OtherRHJ MEDICAL CENT…GREENBRIAR: $261,729 · OtherJ4T: $256,131 · OtherWESTMORELAND COUNTY BEHAVIORAL: $245,310 · OtherGLENBEIGH: $241,539 · OtherMEDMARK: $215,628 · OtherRHJ MEDICAL CENTER INC: $198,724 · OtherHPW ASSOCIATES LLC: $183,915 · OtherALLIED ADDICTION RECOVERY: $183,484 · Other+22 more: $1,041,561 · Other+22 moreMONESSEN COMMUNITIES THAT CARE: $345,644 · Youth DevelopmentRENEWAL INC: $6,132 · Crime & Legal
Health$11,194,221Education$9,663,903Human Services$7,615,216Other$5,071,980Youth Development$345,644Crime & Legal$6,132

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $8,387,382 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetWESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC: $6,846,979 over 5y, 14% of budgetSOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL CARE INC: $4,945,549 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetUPMC: $2,875,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGATEWAY REHABILITATION CENTER: $1,767,101 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $1,276,521 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUPMC Center for High-Value Healthcare: $546,327 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetWESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $519,369 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSPIRITLIFE INC: $467,525 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetMONESSEN COMMUNITIES THAT CARE: $345,644 over 6y, 100% of budgetMonongahela Valley Hospital Inc: $230,203 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOutside-In School of Experiential Education Inc: $212,594 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetFIRETREE LTD: $137,235 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetELLEN O'BRIEN GAISER ADDICTION CENTER: $107,827 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTWIN LAKES CENTER INC: $94,859 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HIGHLAND HOUSE: $89,089 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetCLUB SERENITY INC: $49,822 over 4y, 62% of budgetGAUDENZIA ERIE INC: $39,074 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetASCEND CLINICAL SERVICES DBA NAAMAN CLINICAL SERVICES: $36,274 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGAUDENZIA INC: $20,919 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRENEWAL INC: $6,132 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds UPMC ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds UPMC Center for High-Value Healthcare ↗
  • Who funds WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SPIRITLIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds MONESSEN COMMUNITIES THAT CARE ↗
  • Who funds Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds Outside-In School of Experiential Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds FIRETREE LTD ↗
  • Who funds ELLEN O'BRIEN GAISER ADDICTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TWIN LAKES CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HIGHLAND HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CLUB SERENITY INC ↗
  • Who funds GAUDENZIA ERIE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Council on Chemical Abuse IncPA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Council on Chemical Abuse Inc · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Bucks County Drug & Alcohol Commission Inc · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Westmoreland Drug & Alcohol Commission funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Westmoreland Drug & Alcohol Commission. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Oxford House Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Westmoreland Drug & Alcohol Commission?

Find your warmest path to Westmoreland Drug & Alcohol Commission through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Westmoreland Drug & Alcohol Commission’s filings →

More from the funding graph