· Private foundation
Westlawn Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k41 grants · $114k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $277k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $438k
- $250k+1 grant · $278k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Yeshiva Yagdil Torah | $277,500 |
| American Friends Of Mosdot Gur | $188,180 |
| Cong Knesset Simcha | $100,000 |
| Ohr Torah | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| Machzikei Haddas Rabbinical College | $50,000 |
| Cong Tzemach Tzaddik | $36,700 |
| RCCS | $36,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $35,000 |
| CONG Pnei Menachem | $33,400 |
| American Friends of Sfath Emeth Yeshiva | $32,300 |
| Talmud Torah Imrei Emes | $28,600 |
| Yeshiva Ktana | $21,800 |
| Lihatzilum | $20,000 |
| Cong Yetev Lev | $18,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +179% since the first grant, against +139% for those funded once.
64 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $346k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA8× · 2017–2024 · $331k · revenue +88%
- FOFRIENDS OF CHOSEN YESHIAS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $200k · revenue +412%
- ZAZECHER AVROHOM INC6× · 2017–2023 · $60k · revenue +282%
Funded once
- PFPROVIDENCE FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $325k · revenue ×122
- CBCong Bobov 45one grant, 2022 · $250k
- COCONG OF ECHO RIDGEone grant, 2022 · $250k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Furtherance of jewish education
To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.
Keren hayeshivot fund supports religious institutions of higher education in the united states and israel to raise the level of torah and halachic observance in the sephardic orthodox jewish community.
We support religious organizations in the us and israel by providing grants.
To further jewish education in israel
Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.
A post-secondary school offering an educational program in talmudic study
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
The organization's primary mission is charitable and religious in nature, supporting judaic and rabbinical education by providing financial assistance to institutions of jewish learning, currently through grants to shaare mordechai in…
To promote authentic orthodox judaisim by helping fund jewish causes worldwide.
Keren hayeshivot trust supports religious institutions of higher education in the united states and israel to raise the level of torah and halachic observance in the sephardic orthodox jewish community.
How this is measured
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 176 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Friends of Mosdot Goor · Park Charitable Trust · Eastlawn Foundation · Birchas Mordechai Charitable Foundation · Chaim Maleh Foundation · Zecher Avrohom Inc · Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc · Doovin Trust · Alternative Energy Foundation · Lart Charitable Trust · The United Elenar Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Westlawn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Westlawn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Westlawn Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Westlawn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Westlawn’s filings →