Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Lart Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$109k
Granted FY2018
14
Grants FY2018
14
Organizations funded FY2018
14%
First-time grantees FY2018
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

83% of Lart Charitable Trust’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Friends Of Mosdot Goor, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Lart Charitable Trust named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $109k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
8
’18
3
’19
3
’20
3
’21
4
’22
3
’23
10
’24
9
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2018
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2018
$96,980
Organizations funded a year
14 to 14
FY2017 to FY2018
States reached, FY2018
2
Total assets, FY2018
$1.5M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2018, 14% of the organizations Lart Charitable Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 2% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY201814$109k14%
FY201714$106kn/a
90% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$546kEducation$373kHealth$2kHuman Services$2kPhilanthropy$225Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Kupat Eizer Nisuin Bais Yisroel$26,9154n/a
Bais Yaakov D Chassidei Gur$6,6409n/a
Congregation Pnei Menachem$5,7509n/a
American Friends of Sfath Emeth Yeshiva$5,1003n/a
Congregation Bais Berliner$2,5001n/a
Chai Lifeline Inc$1,54020%
Cong Zichron Yisroel$1,5001n/a
Friends of Yeshiva Sifsei Tzadik$1,30020%
Kupath Rambahn Kolel Polin$1,01910%
Menucha Chesed Services Corp$1,00010%
Show all 24 grantees
All grantees of Lart Charitable Trust by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Kupat Eizer Nisuin Bais Yisroel$26,9154n/a
Bais Yaakov D Chassidei Gur$6,6409n/a
Congregation Pnei Menachem$5,7509n/a
American Friends of Sfath Emeth Yeshiva$5,1003n/a
Congregation Bais Berliner$2,5001n/a
Chai Lifeline Inc$1,54020%
Cong Zichron Yisroel$1,5001n/a
Friends of Yeshiva Sifsei Tzadik$1,30020%
Kupath Rambahn Kolel Polin$1,01910%
Menucha Chesed Services Corp$1,00010%
American Friends of Mosdos Bet Shemesh$1,00020%
Congregation Bais Aron$1,0001n/a
Gerer Yeshiva and Mesivta Bais Yisroel$1,0001n/a
Congregation Ahavas Tzdokah Vchesed Inc$1,0002n/a
Kollel Bais Yisroel Inc$1,0001n/a
Yeshiva Yagdil Torah$1,0002n/a
American Friends of Yeshiva Imrei Emes I$5502n/a
Congregation Keren Hagemach$5001n/a
Friends of Bais Yisroel$50010%
Ezer Lanitzrachim Inc$5001n/a
Friends of Harim$5001n/a
Merkaz Hatzedaka Corp$2501n/a
Imanu$22510%
Friends of Lenefesh Tidreshenu Inc$20010%

Plus 30 recipients with no EIN on record ($508k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Lart Charitable Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChai Lifeline Inc: $1,540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Yeshiva Sifsei Tzadik: $1,300 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKupath Rambahn Kolel Polin: $1,019 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMenucha Chesed Services Corp: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Mosdos Bet Shemesh: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Bais Yisroel: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetImanu: $225 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Lenefesh Tidreshenu Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY37.6× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Friends of Mosdot Goor · Westlawn Foundation · Chaim Maleh Foundation · Park Charitable Trust · Eastlawn Foundation · Doovin Trust · The Tzedakah Foundation · Birchas Mordechai Charitable Foundation · Zecher Avrohom Inc · The Fishoff Family Foundation · Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Lart Charitable Trust with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lart Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Lart Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Lart Charitable Trust

How much does Lart Charitable Trust give?
Lart Charitable Trust reported 14 grants totaling $108,659 in its FY2018 IRS filing. It funded between 14 and 14 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2018.
What does Lart Charitable Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (58%), Education (39%), Health (0%).
Who are Lart Charitable Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Kupat Eizer Nisuin Bais Yisroel ($27k), Bais Yaakov D Chassidei Gur ($7k), Congregation Pnei Menachem ($6k).
Does Lart Charitable Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2018, 14% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Lart Charitable Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Lart Charitable Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Ojc Fund, Friends of Mosdot Goor, Westlawn Foundation.
Where is Lart Charitable Trust based?
Lart Charitable Trust is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lart’s filings →

More from the funding graph