Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Westerstrom Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$182k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$442kHuman Services$232kReligion$150kAnimals$69kFood & Nutrition$63kHousing & Shelter$32k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUTHERAN CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER$25,000
ATLANTA HUMANE SOCIETY$13,200
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION -GEORGIA CHAPTER$12,000
THE ELAINE CLARK CENTER$12,000
CURE CHILDHOOD CANCER$12,000
THE LIONHEART LIFE CENTER$12,000
VISITING NURSE HEALTHHOSPICE OF ATLANTA$12,000
GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER$12,000
NO LONGER BOUND$12,000
SHEPHERD SPINAL CENTER INC$12,000
ATLANTA MISSION$12,000
THE SALVATION ARMY - GEORGIA DIVISION$12,000
ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$12,000
SUNSHINE HOUSE REGIONAL CHILDREN'S CTR$12,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ATLANTA MISSION: $12k → 13%ATLANTA MISSION: $12k → 13%ATLANTA MISSION: $10k → 13%ATLANTA MISSION: $10k → 13%ATLANTA MISSION: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$976k · 18 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$976k
$12k

Still filing today

44%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LIONHEART LIFE CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $64k · revenue +46%
  • TG
    THE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $64k · revenue +38%
  • Cure Childhood Cancer Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $63k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • AA
    ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION -GEORGIA CHAPTER
    one grant, 2025 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Atlanta Pregnancy Resource Centers Inc

To share the truth and compassion of jesus christ, support life-affirming choices and promote healthy relationships by serving and caring for women and families in pregnancy-related circumstances

2
Enable of Georgia Inc

Supporting people with special needs to lead fulfilled lives.

Housing & Shelter
3
Covenant Care Services Inc

Covenant Care Services, Inc. is a non-profit faith-based adoption agency serving birthmothers and adoptive families in the state of Georgia. The Organization counsels women experiencing unplanned pregancy and educates them about the option…

Human Services
4
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
5
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits

Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…

Community Improvement
6
Easter Seals East Georgia Inc

Easter Seals East Georgia's mission is to provide exceptional services to ensure that people with disabilities and barriers to employment maximize their potential for employment and independence and broaden their opportunities for full…

Human Services
7
Restoration Atl Mission Inc

Restoration Atlanta exists to strengthen & equip under-resourced families to experience holistic restoration. We carry this out through providing ministry, childcare, and child development services to families experiencing homelessness and…

Religion
8
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
9
Evergreen Recovery Centers

To facilitate health and recovery for persons affected by alcoholism and other drug addiction through a comprehensive array of services, including residential and outpatient treatment, therapeutic daycare, parenting, detoxification, and…

Health
10
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
The Arc of Southwest Georgia Inc

Our mission is to create life-changing solutions for people with disabilities.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Cure Childhood Cancer Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LUTHERAN CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER — $150,000 · OtherLUTHERAN CHURCH OF THE REDEEMERTHE SALVATION ARMY — $68,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSUNSHINE HOUSE REGIONAL CHILDREN'S CTR — $36,000 · OtherSUNSHINE HOUSE REGIONAL CHILDREN'S CTRSHEPHERD SPINAL CENTER INC — $36,000 · OtherSHEPHERD SPINAL CENTER INCVISITING NURSE HEALTHHOSPICE OF ATLANTA — $36,000 · OtherVISITING NURSE HEALTHHOSPICE OF ATLANTAVISITING NURSEHOSPICE OF ATLANTA — $32,000 · OtherVISITING NURSEHOSPICE OF ATLANTASUNSHINE HOUSE REGIONAL — $32,000 · OtherSUNSHINE HOUSE REGIONALALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION — $32,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONSHEPHERDS SPINAL CENTER — $26,600 · OtherSHEPHERDS SPINAL CENTERALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION ATLANTA AREA — $19,000 · Other+1 more — $12,000 · OtherTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC — $64,000 · HealthTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HE…Cure Childhood Cancer Inc — $63,000 · HealthCure Childhood Cancer…NO LONGER BOUND INC — $57,200 · HealthNO LONGER BOUND INCTHE LIONHEART LIFE CENTER INC — $64,000 · EducationTHE LIONHEART …THE ELAINE CLARK CENTER INC — $62,000 · EducationTHE ELAINE CLA…Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc — $69,200 · AnimalsATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION — $66,000 · Human ServicesATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $63,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$479,600Health$184,200Education$126,000Animals$69,200Human Services$66,000Food & Nutrition$63,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc — $69,200 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION — $66,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LIONHEART LIFE CENTER INC — $64,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC — $64,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCure Childhood Cancer Inc — $63,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $63,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELAINE CLARK CENTER INC — $62,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetNO LONGER BOUND INC — $57,200 over 6y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc
  • Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION
  • Who funds THE LIONHEART LIFE CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC
  • Who funds Cure Childhood Cancer Inc
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds THE ELAINE CLARK CENTER INC
  • Who funds NO LONGER BOUND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Westerstrom Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Westerstrom Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Westerstrom Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph