Skip to content

· Public charity

Western Rivers Conservancy

WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY's mission is to protect outstanding river ecosystems in the western united states.

$4.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3.3M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$5.0MCommunity Improvement$300kArts & Culture$75kEducation$12k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $3,413,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,045,968 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $632,968 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.3M
$75,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$54M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE YORK TRIBE A FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBE$3,328,000
ESSELEN TRIBE OF MONTEREY COUNTY$75,000
YES ON PROP 4 CALIFORNIANS FOR SAFE DRINKING WATER AND WILDLIFE PREVENTION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OPPORTUNITY FUND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $300k → 8%ESSELEN TRIBE OF MONTEREY COUNTY: $75k → 12%YES ON PROP 4 CALIFORNIANS FOR SAFE DRINKING WATER AND WILDLIFE PREVENTION: $10k → 12%MOJAVE DESERT LAND TRUST: $100k → 14%THE YORK TRIBE A FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBE: $3.3M → 17%OSU FOUNDATION: $12k → 18%COLORADO OPEN LANDS: $154k → 7%RIO GRANDE HEADWATERS LAND TRUST: $157k → 14%NISQUALLY LAND TRUST: $10k → 9%THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE RESERVATION: $84k → 17%ER'- NERR' LAND FUND CO THE YUROK TRIBE: $742k → 17%COLORADO OPEN LANDS FOUNDATION: $172k → 7%RIO GRANDE HEADWATERS LAND TRUST: $157k → 14%THE YUROK TRIBE: $11k → 17%COLORADO OPEN LANDS FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%RIO GRANDE HEADWATERS LAND TRUST: $8k → 14%THE YUROK TRIBE: $9k → 17%THE YUROK TRIBE: $9k → 17%THE YUROK TRIBE: $7k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

10%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$548k · 3 repeat orgs$4.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +307% since the first grant, against +80% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$548k
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+307%
+80%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RG
    RIO GRANDE HEADWATERS LAND TRUST
    3× · 2017–2019 · $321k · revenue -30%
  • CF
    COL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $192k · revenue +307% · 42% of their budget
  • YT
    YUROK TRIBE
    4× · 2018–2022 · $35k

Funded once

  • EL
    ER'-NERR' LAND FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $742k · revenue +4%
  • AO
    ACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $300k · revenue +198%
  • CO
    COLORADO OPEN LANDSgraduated
    2× · 2017–2025 · $154k · revenue +215%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Wildlife Foundation

The foundation works with diverse groups representing many interests to acquire and restore critical wildlife habitat and protecting species

Animals
2
The Grand Canyon Trust Inc

The mission of the grand canyon trust is to safeguard the wonders of the grand canyon and the colorado plateau, while supporting the rights of its native peoples.

Environment
3
San Isabel Land Protection Trust

The principal mission of the land trust is to work with landowners to protect agricultural and forest lands, water resources, wildlife habitat and scenic open spaces, and to serve our community by facilitating parks and trail in custer,…

—
4
Colorado Water Trust

To restore water to colorado's rivers.

Environment
5
CalWild

The California Wilderness Coalition protects the natural landscapes that make California unique, providing clean air and water, a home to wildlife, and a place for recreation and spiritual renewal.

—
6
Sempervirens Fund

To ensure coast redwood forests in the santa cruz mountains thrive for generations to come. since 1900, sempervirens has protected more than 36,000 acres. learn more about our mission, vision, and strategic plan through 2030 at:…

Environment
7
Center for Natural Lands Management

The mission of the center for natural lands management is (a) to conserve native species, their habitat and functioning ecosystems in perpetuity, (b) to own and/or manage lands in an ecologically beneficial manner consistent with local,…

Environment
8
The Jmt Wilderness Conservancy

Working to restore the watersheds, wilderness, and wildlife in the high sierra nevada following the john muir trail (est. 1915) for all life in california.

Environment
9
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
10
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
11
California Council of Land Trusts

To conserve California's extraordinary land and water resources through a strong network of land trusts with one cohesive voice across urban and rural communities.

Environment
12
Washington Water Trust

Wwt's mission is to protect and restore water in rivers and streams across washington state. washington water trust restores and protects water in rivers and streams and promotes sustainable freshwater management in washington, and, more…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rio Grande Headwaters Land Trust; the most unlike its peers is Kern River Valley Heritage Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE YORK TRIBE A FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBE: $3,328,000 · OtherTHE YORK TRIBE A FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBE+3 more: $180,022 · OtherER'-NERR' LAND FUND: $741,775 · EnvironmentER'-NERR' LAND FUNDRIO GRANDE HEADWATERS LAND TRUST: $320,500 · EnvironmentRIO GRANDE HEADWATERS LAND TRUS…COL FOUNDATION: $192,150 · EnvironmentCOL FOUNDATIONCOLORADO OPEN LANDS: $154,150 · EnvironmentCOLORADO OPEN LANDSTHE CALIFORNIA DESERT LAND CONSERVANCY: $100,000 · EnvironmentTHE CALIFORNIA DESERT LAND CONS…+2 more: $20,000 · EnvironmentACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $300,000 · Community ImprovementEsselen Tribe of Monterey County: $75,000 · Arts & CultureOregon State University Foundation: $11,737 · Education
Other$3,508,022Environment$1,528,575Community Improvement$300,000Arts & Culture$75,000Education$11,737

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetER'-NERR' LAND FUND: $741,775 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetRIO GRANDE HEADWATERS LAND TRUST: $320,500 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $300,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOL FOUNDATION: $192,150 over 2y, 42% of budgetCOLORADO OPEN LANDS: $154,150 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA DESERT LAND CONSERVANCY: $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEsselen Tribe of Monterey County: $75,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $11,737 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNISQUALLY LAND TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Resources Legacy FundCA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Resources Legacy Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Western Rivers Conservancy funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Western Rivers Conservancy. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Western Rivers Conservancy?

Find your warmest path to Western Rivers Conservancy through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Western Rivers Conservancy’s filings →

More from the funding graph