Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

West Virginia Community Action Partnersh

WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHip is an alliance of community action agencies that supports and strengthens our members, advocates for low-income and families and promotes partnerships.

$3.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$891k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$11MCommunity Improvement$3.5MHousing & Shelter$2.3MEmployment$1.7MCrime & Legal$234kOther$4.2M
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $3,437,536 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,515,351 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $77,815 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $446k
  • $250k+6 grants · $3.0M
$360,282
Median grant
1
States reached
$918k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWESTERN CAC INC$891,298
MOUNTAIN CAP OF WV INC$606,483
EASTERN WEST VIRGINIA CAA$481,402
NORTH CENTRAL WV CAA INC$370,996
COALFIELD CAP INC$360,282
TELEMON CORPORATION$280,837
PRIDE COMMUNITY SERVICE INC$166,106
CHANGE INC$140,652
LEGAL AID OF WEST VIRGINIA INC$139,480
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $10.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%TELEMON CORPORATION: $327k → 11%NORTH CENTRAL WV CAA INC: $371k → 15%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $10k → 19%SOUTHWESTERN CAC INC: $891k → 19%RALEIGH COUNTY CAA INC: $162k → 20%TELEMON CORPORATION: $310k → 11%NORTH CENTRAL WV CAA INC: $323k → 15%SOUTHWESTERN CAA INC: $866k → 19%RALEIGH COUNTY CAA INC: $144k → 20%TELEMON CORPORATION: $281k → 11%NORTH CENTRAL WV CAA INC: $297k → 15%SOUTHWESTERN CAC INC: $792k → 19%RALEIGH COUNTY CAA INC: $93k → 20%TELEMON CORPORATION: $255k → 11%NORTH CENTRAL WV CAA INC: $294k → 15%SOUTHWESTERN CAC INC: $749k → 19%RALEIGH COUNTY CAA INC: $22k → 20%TELEMON CORPORATION: $250k → 11%NORTH CENTRAL WV CAA INC: $269k → 15%ENACT INC: $12k → 18%SOUTHWESTERN CAC INC: $635k → 19%TELEMON CORPORATION: $215k → 11%NORTH CENTRAL WV CAA INC: $262k → 15%SOUTHWESTERN CAA INC: $607k → 19%TELEMON CORPORATION: $209k → 11%NORTH CENTRAL WV CAA INC: $245k → 15%SOUTHWESTERN CAA INC: $406k → 19%TELEMON CORPORATION: $182k → 11%NORTH CENTRAL WV CAA INC: $235k → 15%SOUTHWESTERN CAA INC: $404k → 19%TELEMON CORPORATION: $179k → 11%NORTH CENTRAL WV CAA INC: $199k → 15%SOUTHWESTERN CAA INC: $319k → 19%TELEMON CORPORATION: $6k → 11%NORTH CENTRAL WV CAA INC: $13k → 15%SOUTHWESTERN CAA INC: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$23M · 10 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$23M
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+25%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterEmploymentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.7M · revenue +47%
  • MC
    MOUNTAIN CAP OF WEST VIRGINIA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.1M · revenue +104%
  • NC
    North Central WV Community Action Assoc Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • EI
    ENACT INC
    one grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue +8%
  • CR
    COMMUNITY RESOURCES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +25%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTH EASTERN WEST VIRGINIA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Action Agency of Southern New Mexico Inc

Caasnm is a 60 year-old new mexico statewide health and social services not for profit with a mission of uplifting low-income families by connecting communities, encouraging family wellness, empowering families, and bridging resources.

Human Services
2
Community Action Partnership of Central Illinois Inc

Agency provides community assistance to low income families and individuals including assistance with utility bills, home weatherization, emergency housing

Human Services
3
Community Action Agency Inc

To aid low income families with early education, energy assistance, nutrition help and other services.

Human Services
4
Community Action Agency of Northwest Alabama Inc

Our mission is to reduce the causes and adverse consequences of poverty and to empower low-income individuals, families and communities to achieve self-sufficiency through advocacy, resource utilization and service delivery.

5
Community Action of Southern Kentucky Inc

We team with Community partners to provide human services with dignity and respect, empowering people in Southern Kentucky to achieve stability and economic security.

6
Community Action Agency of South Alabama Inc

Administration of federal, state and local awards and grants for the poverty sector of a 7 county area in alabama, providing headstart education, food, shelter, maintenance, and weatherization programs.

7
Community Action Commission of Belmont County

Community assistance

Human Services
8
Community Action Partnership of Middle Alabama Inc

Providing low income individuals home energy assistance and providing emergency assitance as needed

9
Lower Columbia Community Action Council

To provide services for low income individuals, provide training to individuals seeking employment, and assist senior citizens under entitlement programs.

Human Services
10
Community Action for Improvement Inc

The mission of community action for improvement, inc. is to build sustainable communities with partners by providing services and resources utilizing the whole family approach with low-income households to help reduce the burdens of…

11
Community Action Agency of Northeast Alabama Inc

To assist individuals at or below the poverty line by providing resources, funding, and education.

Human Services
12
Center for Community Action

The center for community action is the designated lead poverty agency for blair, bedford, fulton, and huntingdon counties in central pennsylvania and exists to provide a broad spectrum of services to the low income residents of the…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Wv Community Action Assoc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Enact Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $5,678,551 · Human ServicesSOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INCNorth Central WV Community Action Assoc Inc — $2,505,984 · Human ServicesNorth Central WV Community Action Assoc IncTELAMON CORPORATION — $2,213,925 · Human ServicesTELAMON CORPORATIONRALEIGH COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC — $420,387 · Human Services+2 more — $22,230 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN CAP OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $4,148,411 · OtherMOUNTAIN CAP OF WEST…+1 more — $5,050 · OtherCOALFIELD COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP — $2,071,991 · Community ImprovementCOALFIELD COMMUNI…PRIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $1,415,454 · Community ImprovementPRIDE COMMUNITY S…+1 more — $5,770 · Community ImprovementEASTERN WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $2,313,957 · Housing & ShelterEASTERN WES…CHANGE INC — $1,692,371 · EmploymentLEGAL AID OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $233,543 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$10,841,077Other$4,153,461Community Improvement$3,493,215Housing & Shelter$2,313,957Employment$1,692,371Crime & Legal$233,543

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $5,678,551 over 9y, 5.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN CAP OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $4,148,411 over 9y, 17% of budgetNorth Central WV Community Action Assoc Inc — $2,505,984 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetEASTERN WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $2,313,957 over 9y, 10% of budgetTELAMON CORPORATION — $2,213,925 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCOALFIELD COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP — $2,071,991 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetCHANGE INC — $1,692,371 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetPRIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $1,415,454 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetRALEIGH COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC — $420,387 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetLEGAL AID OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $233,543 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetENACT INC — $12,310 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCES INC — $9,920 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTH EASTERN WEST VIRGINIA INC — $5,770 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL WV COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOC INC — $5,050 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN CAP OF WEST VIRGINIA INC
  • Who funds North Central WV Community Action Assoc Inc
  • Who funds EASTERN WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC
  • Who funds TELAMON CORPORATION
  • Who funds COALFIELD COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
  • Who funds CHANGE INC
  • Who funds PRIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds RALEIGH COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds LEGAL AID OF WEST VIRGINIA INC
  • Who funds ENACT INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTH EASTERN WEST VIRGINIA INC
  • Who funds CENTRAL WV COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOC INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization West Virginia Community Action Partnersh funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph