Skip to content

· Private foundation

Weldon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$198kFood & Nutrition$107kEnvironment$60kRecreation & Sports$33kHealth$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kReligion$5kAnimals$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTIAN HELP INC$12,000
WV BLACKHILLS FREE METHODIST CAMP$10,000
CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH$6,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV$5,000
COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC$5,000
PANTRY PLUS MORE INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $183k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $6k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $5k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $5k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $5k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $5k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $5k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $4k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $2k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $1k → 15%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $12k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $18k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $13k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $12k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $10k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $9k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $9k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $9k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $9k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $8k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $8k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $5k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $6k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $5k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $5k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $5k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $3k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$427k · 15 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$427k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
0%

Still filing today

60%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentFood & NutritionHealthAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $74k · revenue +453%
  • CH
    CHRISTIAN HELP INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $72k · revenue +674%
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • DO
    DAUGHTER OF THE KING MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IT
    IN TOUCH & CONCERNED INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mountain View Humane

The mission of mountain view humane is to end pet overpopulation in southwest virginia and southern west virginia by providing safe, affordable spay/neuter services and vaccine clinics for the community.

Animals
2
The Lord's Pantry of Shinnston

Provide food to needy individuals & families - food is puchased from several sources, donated from serveral sources. costs include renting u-haul trucks to picking up truck loads of food from the mountaineer food bank. we also provide…

—
3
Mountaineer Food Bank Inc

The organization's mission is to help alleviate hunger in west virginia, educate the general public of the organization's existence and mission, promote awareness of hunger in west virginia, continue to develop and maintain a network for…

Food & Nutrition
4
Manna Meal Inc

Manna meal provides breakfast and lunch 7 days a week, 365 days a year at our location in st. john's episcopal church, charleston, wv. manna meal serves women, men, families, and seniors on a non-discriminary basis.

—
5
Christian Community Cupboard

Reduce hunger and provide food to families in need.

Religion
6
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
7
Mountain State Justice Inc

Mountain state justice provides free legal services to low income people in west virginia and assures that low income people have access to the court system.

Crime & Legal
8
Mountaineer Community Health Center

To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.

Health
9
Martinsburg Union Rescue Mission Inc

To provide housing, food and religious counseling for the needy and underprivileged.

Housing & Shelter
10
Community Combined Miinistries Inc

Ccm feeds underprivileged children in wv

Religion
11
Central Wv Center for Pregnancy Care Inc

Preventing termination of pregnancies

—
12
Tug Valley Recovery Shelter Associationinc

Shelter service for abused women and children in mingo and logan counties in west virginia.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mylan Park Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mountaineer Spay Neuter Assistance Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INC: $73,500 · Human ServicesCHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INCCHRISTIAN HELP INC: $71,572 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN HELP INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $37,600 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INCCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $38,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INCWV BLACKHILLS FREE METHODIST CAMP: $25,000 · OtherWV BLACKHILLS FREE METHODIST CAMPMON HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER: $21,500 · OtherMON HEALTH MEDICAL CENTERVALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $10,000 · OtherVALLEY FOOD PANTRYSALVATION ARMY: $9,543 · OtherSALVATION ARMYMAKE A WISH OF PENNSYLVANIA AND WV: $8,800 · OtherMAKE A WISH OF PENNSYLVANIA AND WVVALLEY DISTRICT FOOD PANTRY: $8,000 · OtherVALLEY DISTRICT FOOD PANTRYIN TOUCH & CONCERNED INC: $5,000 · Other+6 more: $16,000 · Other+6 moreWEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $60,422 · EnvironmentWEST VIRGINIA B…THE PANTRY PLUS MORE INC: $41,500 · Food & NutritionTHE PANTRY…MILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC: $10,000 · HealthMYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · EducationDAUGHTER OF THE KING MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · ReligionMOUNTAINEER SPAY NEUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $4,000 · Animals
Human Services$182,672Other$141,843Environment$60,422Food & Nutrition$41,500Health$10,000Education$8,000Religion$5,000Animals$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INC: $73,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCHRISTIAN HELP INC: $71,572 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $60,422 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetTHE PANTRY PLUS MORE INC: $41,500 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $38,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $37,600 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNTAINEER SPAY NEUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $4,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PANTRY PLUS MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds MYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DAUGHTER OF THE KING MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINEER SPAY NEUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Milan Puskar Foundation IncWV22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Hazel Ruby McQuain Charitable Trust · Your Community Foundation of North Central Wv Inc · Lynch Foundation Inc · John M Brown Family Foundation · George D Hott Foundation · United Way of Monongalia and Preston Counites Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation · Empty Bowls Monongalia · Firstenergy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weldon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weldon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Weldon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph