· Private foundation
Weisfeld Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k24 grants · $65k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $147k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $160k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION | $60,000 |
| BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| EARL MONROE NEW RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN | $27,370 |
| AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR AGING RESEARCH (AFAR) | $25,000 |
| MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTION FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PECONIC HOCKEY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY POLICE RELATIONS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| NAALEH HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS | $10,000 |
| WHITE PLAINS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HOLTZ CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| WOMEN'S EMERGENCY NETWORK | $9,000 |
| MIAMI FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUniversity of Michigan6× · 2018–2024 · $381k · revenue +195% · 53% of their budget
- MSMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $131k · revenue +140%
- AFAMERICAN FEDERATION FOR AGING RESEARCH INC6× · 2018–2024 · $91k · revenue +287%
Funded once
- NYNEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE VEBA TRUSTone grant, 2019 · $100k
- NYNEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINEone grant, 2023 · $50k
- CSCARDOZO SCHOOL OF LAW AT YESHIVA UNIVERSITYone grant, 2020 · $35k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…
The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Green Beret Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Benevolence Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds University of Michigan ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR AGING RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY-POLICE RELATIONS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds White Plains Hospital Medical Center ↗
- Who funds NAALEH HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds PECONIC HOCKEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOTUS ENDOWMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND ↗
- Who funds KRISTI HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Hit the Books Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW RENAISSANCE BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WILLOW TOWERS INC ↗
- Who funds WOMENS EMERGENCY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds OVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds JAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Julie and Martin Franklin Family Foundation Inc · Daniel L Nir & Jill E Braufman Family Foundation Inc · The Prince Family Foundation · Lauren B Leichtman & Arthur E Levine Family Foundation · The Tammy and Jay Levine Foundation Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Weisfeld Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Kristi House Inc — 49% of income from government
- University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
- Miami Lighthouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.