Skip to content

· Private foundation

Weinreb Pilecki Segal Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$93k
Granted FY2025still arriving
69
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$219kHousing & Shelter$145kEducation$42kAnimals$40kFood & Nutrition$36kPhilanthropy$32kArts & Culture$30kCivil Rights$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 69 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$620
Median grant
6
States reached
$883k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LIVING ROOM$7,500
HOMEWARD BOUND OF MARIN$6,000
CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT$5,400
MUTTVILLE SENIOR DOG RESCUE$5,000
CHRIST CHURCH UNITED METHODIST$5,000
SF MARIN FOOD BANK$4,000
NCLR$4,000
ROSELAND SCHOOL DISTRICT$4,000
UNA VIDA$4,000
ALAMEDA FOOD BANK$4,000
WEST COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES$2,575
RUTHLESS KINDNESS$2,000
FREE TO BE$2,000
THE LIVING ROOM$2,000
REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $206k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BORDER ANGELS SD: $500 → 11%SEEDS OF LOVE: $1k → 8%MULTICULTERAL CENTER OF MARIN: $500 → 8%SF NEW DEAL: $500 → 10%SEEDS OF LOVE: $500 → 8%SEEDS OF LOVE: $500 → 8%THE LIVING ROOM: $50k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $500 → 10%GRACE SOLUTIONS: $1k → 8%THE LIVING ROOM: $1k → 10%THE LIVING ROOM: $571 → 10%THE LIVING ROOM: $550 → 10%ALAMEDA FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 10%THE LIVING ROOM: $469 → 10%HOMELESS ACTION SONOMA: $7k → 9%FAR AWAY PROJECTS: $2k → 10%HOMELESS ACTION SONOMA: $5k → 9%HOMELESS ACTION SONOMA: $3k → 9%FRIENDS IN SONOMA HELPING: $500 → 9%FRIENDS IN SONOMA HELPING: $500 → 9%MULTICULTURAL CENTER OF MARIN: $500 → 8%THE LIVING ROOM: $40k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $15k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM CENTER: $12k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $10k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $10k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $8k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM CENTER: $6k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $5k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $2k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM CENTER: $2k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $2k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $2k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $2k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $2k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM CENTER: $750 → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $750 → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $577 → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $535 → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $530 → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $510 → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $502 → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $500 → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $500 → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $444 → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $415 → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $390 → 9%THE LIVING ROOM: $339 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
AZ
TN
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$554k · 75 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

75 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 49 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

75
126

Total granted

$554k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+15%

Still filing today

56%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureEducationInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LIVING ROOM CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $180k · revenue +176%
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER PETALUMA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $49k · revenue +334%
  • HB
    Homeward Bound of Marin
    6× · 2019–2025 · $46k · revenue +269%

Funded once

  • VI
    VITAL IMMIGRANT DEFENSE ADVOCACY SE
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • V
    VIDAS
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
San Francisco Public Press

The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…

Education
3
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
4
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
5
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
6
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
7
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
8
Homes for California Dba Homes for Sonoma

Homes for Sonoma is a nonprofit developer creating quality workforce housing options that support safe and sustainable community, and finds efficient, scalable solutions to address the housing crisis in Sonoma County and throughout…

Housing & Shelter
9
Sonoma Ecology Center

The Mission of Sonoma Ecology Center is to work with our community to enhance and sustain ecological health in the Sonoma valley.

Environment
10
Santa Cruz Local Inc

Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.

—
11
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
12
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voter Registration Project; the most unlike its peers is Gaines-Jones Scholars. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 225 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
114/116
Grantees still filing
74/116
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE LIVING ROOM CENTER: $180,265 · Human ServicesTHE LIVING ROOM CENTERHomeless Action Sonoma Inc: $15,500 · Human ServicesHomeless Action Sonoma IncTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $9,633 · Human Services+14 more: $14,352 · Human Services+14 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION SONOMA: $23,425 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION SONOMAROSELAND SCHOOL DISTRICT: $15,205 · OtherROSELAND SCHOOL DISTRICTWEST COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $12,215 · OtherVITAL IMMIGRANT DEFENSE ADVOCACY SE: $9,500 · Other+151 more: $204,260 · Other+151 moreREBUILDING TOGETHER PETALUMA INC: $48,855 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TOGETHER…Homeward Bound of Marin: $45,626 · Housing & ShelterHomeward Bound of M…Sonoma Applied Village Services: $22,132 · Housing & ShelterSonoma Applied Vill…+1 more: $100 · Housing & ShelterREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $10,155 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR THOUGHT: $7,969 · Food & NutritionAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank: $4,000 · Food & NutritionFarm to Pantry: $2,765 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $500 · Food & NutritionKQED INC: $6,300 · Arts & CultureSTART SOCO: $5,200 · Arts & CultureProject Bandaloop: $3,100 · Arts & CultureLISTENING FOR A CHANGE: $1,550 · Arts & CultureSebastopol Community Cultural Center Incorporated: $1,525 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY: $1,500 · Arts & CultureMEDIA ALLIANCE: $1,069 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE: $915 · Arts & CultureRuthless Kindness: $8,648 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID OF SONOMA COUNTY: $1,000 · Crime & LegalGaines-Jones Scholars: $9,263 · PhilanthropySONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORG: $960 · PhilanthropyPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $748 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $550 · PhilanthropyJOHN JORDAN FOUNDATION: $515 · PhilanthropyRAINBOW RAILROAD USA INC: $500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $258 · Philanthropy
Human Services$219,750Other$264,605Housing & Shelter$116,713Food & Nutrition$25,389Arts & Culture$21,159Crime & Legal$14,648Philanthropy$13,794

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LIVING ROOM CENTER: $180,265 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PETALUMA INC: $48,855 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetHomeward Bound of Marin: $45,626 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSonoma Applied Village Services: $22,132 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetHomeless Action Sonoma Inc: $15,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetWEST COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $12,215 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $10,155 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGaines-Jones Scholars: $9,263 over 7y, 19% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $8,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRuthless Kindness: $8,648 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD FOR THOUGHT: $7,969 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKQED INC: $6,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTART SOCO: $5,200 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFree to Be: $4,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUNA VIDA: $4,100 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWelcoming Home: $3,800 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE REGISTRATION PROJECT INC: $3,500 over 2y, 16% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY WILDLIFE RESCUE: $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetProject Bandaloop: $3,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budget10000 DEGREES: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPETALUMA RIVER PARK FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFarm to Pantry: $2,765 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNext Generation Scholars Inc: $2,575 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSEEDS OF LOVE: $2,515 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLISTENING FOR A CHANGE: $1,550 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetFAR AWAY PROJECTS: $1,525 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSebastopol Community Cultural Center Incorporated: $1,525 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLaguna De Santa Rosa Foundation: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,263 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Multicultural Center of Marin: $1,251 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPets Lifeline Inc: $1,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA ALLIANCE: $1,069 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDowntown Streets Inc: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR LAKE CHAPALA CHARITIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRAIN SUPPORT NETWORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPetaluma Small Craft Center: $1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE LIVING ROOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER PETALUMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Homeward Bound of Marin ↗
  • Who funds Sonoma Applied Village Services ↗
  • Who funds Homeless Action Sonoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds WEST COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Gaines-Jones Scholars ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Ruthless Kindness ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THOUGHT ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds START SOCO ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Free to Be ↗
  • Who funds UNA VIDA ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERS ↗
  • Who funds Alameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Welcoming Home ↗
  • Who funds THE REGISTRATION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA COUNTY WILDLIFE RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Community FoundationCA60.5× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Bothin Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Peter E Haas Jr Family Fund · The Heck Foundation · Heffernan Group Foundation · Exchange Bank Foundation · Bethlehem Foundation - Agy Main

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weinreb Pilecki Segal Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weinreb Pilecki Segal Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Weinreb Pilecki Segal Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Weinreb Pilecki Segal Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 225 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Weinreb Pilecki Segal’s filings →

    More from the funding graph