Skip to content

· Private foundation

Weiner-Marc Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$474k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$866kInternational$403kArts & Culture$389kHuman Services$190kPhilanthropy$113kReligion$110kEducation$101kCrime & Legal$51kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $152k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $243k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$822k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICINE$110,000
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$76,000
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$56,800
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER RES$31,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND$30,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$21,000
CHICAGO CHESED FUND$21,000
ISMICS$15,000
CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE$12,580
ELYSSA'S MISSION$11,000
WOMENS ALZHEIMER'S MOVEMENT$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,600
LUBAVITCH MESIVTA OF CHICAGO$7,920
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$7,700
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%IAVA: $3k → 17%IAVA: $3k → 17%IAVA: $3k → 17%IAVA: $3k → 17%IAVA: $2k → 17%IAVA: $2k → 17%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $29k → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $26k → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $21k → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $21k → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $21k → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $21k → 14%LIBENU FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 40 repeat orgs$109k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
16

Total granted

$2.2M
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+14%

Still filing today

48%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Chicago Medical Center
    4× · 2020–2023 · $405k · revenue +60%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $363k · revenue +127%
  • CC
    CHICAGO CHESED FUND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $138k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • WS
    WOLCOTT SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +14%
  • AA
    AGFAF AFGAN GIRLS FINANCIAL ASSISIT
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
3
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
7
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
8
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
9
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
10
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
11
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
12
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
21/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE IDF: $287,570 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE IDFUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICINE: $210,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICINECENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE: $74,621 · OtherCENTER FOR JEWISH LIFEA WOMAN'S NATION: $48,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER RES: $37,800 · OtherElyssas Mission NFP: $51,000 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $35,000 · Other+34 more: $299,237 · Other+34 moreUniversity of Chicago Medical Center: $405,000 · HealthUniversity of Chicago Med…SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $105,000 · HealthSINAI HEALTH SYSTEMST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $19,000 · Health+5 more: $15,300 · HealthFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $363,204 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED…CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $138,300 · Human ServicesIRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $16,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,800 · Human ServicesJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $105,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $10,800 · InternationalJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $83,985 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $10,800 · PhilanthropyWOLCOTT SCHOOL: $50,000 · EducationMENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $20,210 · Education
Other$1,043,228Health$544,300Arts & Culture$363,204Human Services$156,100International$115,800Philanthropy$94,785Education$70,210

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Chicago Medical Center: $405,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $363,204 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO CHESED FUND: $138,300 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $105,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $105,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $83,985 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetElyssas Mission NFP: $51,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetWOLCOTT SCHOOL: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetA WOMAN'S NATION: $48,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $33,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLAYTHINKS: $31,036 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $20,210 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $16,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $10,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $10,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO MEZUZAH AND MITZVAH CAMPAIGN: $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetALS UNITED GREATER CHICAGO: $5,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Christian Health Center Inc: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBENU: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Chicago Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO CHESED FUND ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Elyssas Mission NFP ↗
  • Who funds WOLCOTT SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds A WOMAN'S NATION ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds PLAYTHINKS ↗
  • Who funds MENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO MEZUZAH AND MITZVAH CAMPAIGN ↗
  • Who funds ALS UNITED GREATER CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL25.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Walder Foundation · Aj & Sl Stern Family Foundation · Todd a and Raphaela Stern Family Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Howard Ross Family Foundation · Peggy and Steve Fossett Foundation · Crain-Maling Foundation · Jarvis Foundation · Bitton Family Foundation Inc · Circle of Service Foundation · AbbVie Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weiner-Marc Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weiner-Marc Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Weiner-Marc Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Weiner-Marc Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Weiner-Marc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph