· Private foundation
Weinberger Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLEDGER CHARITABLE | $42,500 |
| FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM | $12,000 |
| CONGREGATION BAIS MOSHE OF KORUV INC | $6,000 |
| CENTRAL UTA | $1,800 |
| CHAIM V'CHESSED | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| FIRST CONG ANSHEI SEFARD | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| CONG ATERES MOSHE LELOV | $180 |
| CONGREGATION RAV CHASED | $180 |
| CONG AHAVAS CHESED | $100 |
| CONG KHAL CHASIDEI SKVER | $54 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1061% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.
22 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- PCPLEDGER CHARITABLE LTD3× · 2022–2024 · $77k · revenue ×12
- CSCONG SAR SHALOM3× · 2020–2022 · $69k
- CBCONGREGATION BAIS MOSHE OF KORUV INC3× · 2022–2024 · $27k
Funded once
- YGYESHIVA GEDOLA BIRCHAS YAKOVone grant, 2020 · $7k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $6k
- MBMOSDOS BETH YOSEF ZVIone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +10%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote religious observance in israel.
Promulgation and dissemination of Jewish customs, values and ideals to enhance the observance and traditions of Jewish orthodoxy.
Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations
To help the wellbeing of the jewish community of safed, israel and to promote jewish observance and education
Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Yisnasay Foundation · The Margareten Family Foundation · S&W Foundation Inc · The Foundation for Hope · Chavie Stern Family Foundation Inc · Hf Foundation · Zichron Simcha Dsassov · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Weinberger Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weinberger Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Weinberger Family’s filings →