Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Webster Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
93
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$320kReligion$125kYouth Development$70kFood & Nutrition$38kRecreation & Sports$28kHuman Services$20kArts & Culture$10kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 93 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$46k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$2,500
RIPON HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
EARLY BIRD KIWANIS CLUB$2,000
ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC SCHOOL$2,000
BRANDON PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS$2,000
UNIMAGINABLE HOPE$2,000
GRACE ENGLISH CHURCH$2,000
RIPON COLLEGE$2,000
GREEN LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT$2,000
ST JOHNS LUTHERAN SCHOOL$2,000
RIPON AREA VACATION BIBLE SCHOOL$2,000
PEACE LUTHERAN SCHOOL$2,000
RIPON FIRE DISTRICT ASSN$1,600
PRINCETON SCHOOL DISTRICT$1,500
CHURCH IN THE WIND$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BERLIN COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $1k → 15%BERLIN COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $1k → 15%BERLIN COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $1k → 15%BERLIN COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $500 → 15%PRINCETON SENIOR CITIZEN CLUB: $1k → 11%PRINCETON SENIOR CITIZEN CLUB: $500 → 11%PRINCETON SENIOR CITIZEN CLUB: $500 → 11%RIPON CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER: $1k → 9%RIPON'S CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $1k → 9%RIPON CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$481k · 97 repeat orgs$207k to everyone else

97 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 63 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

97
107

Total granted

$481k
$171k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+9%

Still filing today

11%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterReligionEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RIPON COLLEGE
    3× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +58%
  • DP
    DISCOVERY PRESCHOOL INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +104%
  • BC
    Berlin Community Day Care
    4× · 2018–2021 · $4k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • PL
    PEACE LUTHERAN SCHOOL AND YOUTH GRO
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • PH
    PRINCETON HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Prairie Pines Childcare Center

Provide quality childcare services at a central facility in the fosston, mn community. childcare is desperately needed in our area.

Human Services
2
Gale River Co-Op Preschool

To provide a safe, caring and fun envronment for children ages 3-5 that addresses the needs and interest and stimulates learning and development.

Education
3
Buxton Daycare

Daycare center & preschool the purpose is to provide good quality care, protection, and educational experiences for pre-school age children.

4
Garden Preschool Coop Inc

Operate preschool

Human Services
5
Phillipsburg Child Care Center Inc

To provide quality day care services.

Human Services
6
Clymer Library Association of Pocono Pines

Public library

7
Pepin County Child Care Services in

Provide educational child care services to children ages one month through seventeen years of age in our rual community.

8
Acton Barn Cooperative Inc

Acton barn cooperative is a preschool, which runs an educational program designed to foster the emotional, cognitive and physical growth of preschool children.

Education
9
Goshen Day Care Board Inc

To provide professional, developmentally appropriate activities and care for preschool-aged children at affordable rates.

Human Services
10
Wribbenhall Child Development Center

Provide daycare/preschool for children

Education
11
Barnesville Child Day Care Center

Child care and education

Human Services
12
Flint Creek Childcare

Provide daycare for children nineteen months to six years old.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ripon Childrens Learning Center and the most unlike its peers is Jasper Pickett Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number13%3%<5yr13%16%5–10yr21%6%10–20yr12%13%20–35yr15%31%35–55yr26%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value13%2%<5yr13%18%5–10yr21%4%10–20yr12%7%20–35yr15%25%35–55yr26%44%55yr+

The field is 13% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
7%
62/859

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 231 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RIPON SCHOOL DISTRICT — $46,507 · OtherRIPON SCHOOL DISTRICT+188 more — $597,168 · Other+188 moreRIPON COLLEGE — $9,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE BRANDON PUBLIC LIBRARY INC — $2,000 · EducationBerlin Community Day Care — $3,600 · Human ServicesRIPON CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER — $3,400 · Human ServicesPRINCETON SENIOR CITIZEN CLUB — $2,400 · Human ServicesFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentBADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED — $1,750 · Youth DevelopmentGREEN LAKE CONSERVANCY INC — $2,616 · EnvironmentFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH ENDOWMENT TRUST — $2,000 · ReligionCOMMUNITY OPTIONS INC — $2,000 · Housing & ShelterTHRASHER OPERA HOUSE CORPORATION — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$643,675Education$11,000Human Services$9,400Youth Development$3,750Environment$2,616Religion$2,000Housing & Shelter$2,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRIPON COLLEGE — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDISCOVERY PRESCHOOL INC — $8,300 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetRIPON ROTARY CLUB — $5,182 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetFOX RIVER INDUSTRIES INC — $3,600 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBerlin Community Day Care — $3,600 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRIPON CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER — $3,400 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGREEN LAKE CONSERVANCY INC — $2,616 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH ENDOWMENT TRUST — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY OPTIONS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE BRANDON PUBLIC LIBRARY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJASPER PICKETT FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHRASHER OPERA HOUSE CORPORATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RIPON COLLEGE
  • Who funds DISCOVERY PRESCHOOL INC
  • Who funds RIPON ROTARY CLUB

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oshkosh Area Community Foundation CorporationWI25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation · Francis R & Ruth E Oberreich Foundation Corporation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Webster Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Webster Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Webster Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 231 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph