Skip to content

· Public charity

Webster Electric Foundation

The foundation is expressly established to enrich the communities serviced by webster electric cooperative through community betterment projects.

$144k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$149kRecreation & Sports$101kCommunity Improvement$71kEducation$58kPublic Safety & Disaster$57kHousing & Shelter$54kFood & Nutrition$53kHealth$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $126,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $144,291 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,691 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$11,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$70k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NIANGUA VOLUNTEER FIRE DISTRICT$20,000
VILLAGE OF DIGGINS$20,000
DIVERSIFIED FREEDOM FORDISABILITIES$20,000
WEBSTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$15,000
KINGS FOOD PANTRY$11,600
SEYMOUR FIRE DEPARTMENT$10,000
OATS TRANSIT$10,000
FORDLAND MEMORIAL LIBRARY$10,000
HONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%OATS INC: $10k → 17%CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER: $10k → 16%HONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS: $10k → 15%HONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS: $10k → 15%HONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS: $10k → 15%OATS TRANSIT: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$513k · 20 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
15

Total granted

$513k
$132k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+222%

Still filing today

35%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS
    3× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +65%
  • WC
    WEBSTER COUNTY ANNUAL FAIR
    3× · 2018–2023 · $28k · revenue +12%
  • OI
    OATS INC
    2× · 2019–2024 · $20k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • RA
    ROGERSVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +246%
  • UO
    UNIV OF MO EXTENSION CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crocker Community Senior Citizens Center

Provide nutrition and support to senior citizens of crocker, mo and the surrounding area

Human Services
2
Marshall County Senior Citizens Inc

Provide meals and social svcs to senior citizens

—
3
Moniteau County Nutrition Center

Meals on wheels & senior citizens meals.

—
4
Wilson Senior Center Nutrition Site

Provide meals for seniors meals on wheel

Community Improvement
5
Senior Citizens Center of Cordell
Human Services
6
Marshall County Council On Aging

Care for senior citizens

—
7
Webster County Agricultural Associa

To provide a 4-h county fair.

—
8
Scotland County Senior Center Inc

Provide meals for senior citizens

—
9
Mobile Meals Inc of Marshall

Providing meals to senior citizens

—
10
Webster Economic Development Council

To grow the county of webster mo

—
11
Oskaloosa Rural Housing Development

Affordable housing for 62+ and disabled

Housing & Shelter
12
Pierce City Senior Citizens Inc

Senior center serving sr meals

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marshfield Area Chamber of Commerce; the most unlike its peers is Rogersville Area Chamber of Commerc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VILLAGE OF DIGGINS: $48,188 · OtherVILLAGE OF DIGGINSNIANGUA VOLUNTEER FIRE DISTRICT: $37,401 · OtherNIANGUA VOLUNTEER FIRE DISTRICTROGERSVILLE AREA SENIOR CENTER INC: $32,720 · OtherROGERSVILLE AREA SENIOR CENTER INCELKLAND LIONS CLUB INC: $30,943 · OtherELKLAND LIONS CLUB INCNIANGUA TLC: $30,000 · OtherNIANGUA TLCDIVERSIFIED FREEDOM FOR DISABILITIES INC: $30,000 · OtherDIVERSIFIED FREEDOM FOR DISABILITIES INCWEBSTER COUNTY NURSING HOME DISTRICT: $30,000 · OtherWEBSTER COUNTY NURSING HOME DISTRICTFORDLAND MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $29,025 · OtherFORDLAND MEMORIAL LIBRARYWEBSTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $22,474 · OtherFORDLAND SADDLE CLUB: $20,000 · OtherMARSHFIELD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $20,000 · OtherCITY OF FORDLAND PARK BOARD: $17,670 · Other+16 more: $149,578 · Other+16 moreHONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS: $30,000 · Human ServicesHONOR FLIG…OATS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesOATS INCCHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHOICES PR…SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterROGERSVILLE SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING INC: $18,008 · Housing & ShelterWEBSTER COUNTY ANNUAL FAIR: $28,000 · Recreation & SportsSOUTHERN WEBSTER COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $21,600 · Food & NutritionTHE MARSHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUND: $8,990 · Education
Other$497,999Human Services$60,000Housing & Shelter$38,008Recreation & Sports$28,000Food & Nutrition$21,600Education$8,990

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS: $30,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetWEBSTER COUNTY ANNUAL FAIR: $28,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetSOUTHERN WEBSTER COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $21,600 over 2y, 20% of budgetOATS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $20,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetROGERSVILLE SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING INC: $18,008 over 2y, 14% of budgetMarshfield Senior Center: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetTHE MARSHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUND: $8,990 over 1y, 24% of budgetWEBCO CUSTOM INDUSTRIES INC: $6,100 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFORDLAND SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING IN: $5,800 over 1y, 9.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds WEBSTER COUNTY ANNUAL FAIR ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN WEBSTER COUNTY FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds OATS INC ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds ROGERSVILLE SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds ROGERSVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERC ↗
  • Who funds Marshfield Senior Center ↗
  • Who funds CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARSHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUND ↗
  • Who funds WEBCO CUSTOM INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FORDLAND SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING IN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO20.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Webster Electric Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Webster Electric Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Webster Electric Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Webster Electric Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Webster Electric’s filings →

    More from the funding graph