Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Webster Electric Foundation

The foundation is expressly established to enrich the communities serviced by webster electric cooperative through community betterment projects.

$144k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$149kRecreation & Sports$101kCommunity Improvement$71kEducation$58kPublic Safety & Disaster$57kHousing & Shelter$54kFood & Nutrition$53kHealth$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $126,600 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $144,291 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $17,691 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$11,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$70k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VILLAGE OF DIGGINS$20,000
DIVERSIFIED FREEDOM FORDISABILITIES$20,000
NIANGUA VOLUNTEER FIRE DISTRICT$20,000
WEBSTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$15,000
KINGS FOOD PANTRY$11,600
SEYMOUR FIRE DEPARTMENT$10,000
OATS TRANSIT$10,000
HONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS$10,000
FORDLAND MEMORIAL LIBRARY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%OATS INC: $10k → 17%CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER: $10k → 16%HONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS: $10k → 15%HONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS: $10k → 15%HONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS: $10k → 15%OATS TRANSIT: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$513k · 20 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
15

Total granted

$513k
$132k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+222%

Still filing today

35%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS
    3× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +48%
  • WC
    WEBSTER COUNTY ANNUAL FAIR
    3× · 2018–2023 · $28k · revenue +12%
  • MA
    MARSHFIELD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • MS
    Marshfield Senior Center
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -79%
  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIV OF MO EXTENSION CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crocker Community Senior Citizens Center

Provide nutrition and support to senior citizens of crocker, mo and the surrounding area

Human Services
2
Marshall County Senior Citizens Inc

Provide meals and social svcs to senior citizens

3
Moniteau County Nutrition Center

Meals on wheels & senior citizens meals.

4
Wilson Senior Center Nutrition Site

Provide meals for seniors meals on wheel

Community Improvement
5
Senior Citizens Center of Cordell
Human Services
6
Marshall County Council On Aging

Care for senior citizens

7
Webster County Agricultural Associa

To provide a 4-h county fair.

8
Scotland County Senior Center Inc

Provide meals for senior citizens

9
Mobile Meals Inc of Marshall

Providing meals to senior citizens

10
Webster Economic Development Council

To grow the county of webster mo

11
Oskaloosa Rural Housing Development

Affordable housing for 62+ and disabled

Housing & Shelter
12
Pierce City Senior Citizens Inc

Senior center serving sr meals

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marshfield Area Chamber of Commerce and the most unlike its peers is Rogersville Area Chamber of Commerc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr12%14%5–10yr16%31%10–20yr14%24%20–35yr12%10%35–55yr24%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%10%<5yr12%16%5–10yr16%33%10–20yr14%21%20–35yr12%9%35–55yr24%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
13%
243/1,828

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VILLAGE OF DIGGINS — $48,188 · OtherVILLAGE OF DIGGINSNIANGUA VOLUNTEER FIRE DISTRICT — $37,401 · OtherNIANGUA VOLUNTEER FIRE DISTRICTROGERSVILLE AREA SENIOR CENTER INC — $32,720 · OtherROGERSVILLE AREA SENIOR CENTER INCELKLAND LIONS CLUB INC — $30,943 · OtherELKLAND LIONS CLUB INCNIANGUA TLC — $30,000 · OtherNIANGUA TLCWEBSTER COUNTY NURSING HOME DISTRICT — $30,000 · OtherWEBSTER COUNTY NURSING HOME DISTRICTDIVERSIFIED FREEDOM FOR DISABILITIES INC — $30,000 · OtherDIVERSIFIED FREEDOM FOR DISABILITIES INCFORDLAND MEMORIAL LIBRARY — $29,025 · OtherFORDLAND MEMORIAL LIBRARYWEBSTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $22,474 · OtherMARSHFIELD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $20,000 · OtherFORDLAND SADDLE CLUB — $20,000 · OtherCITY OF FORDLAND PARK BOARD — $17,670 · Other+16 more — $149,578 · Other+16 moreHONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS — $30,000 · Human ServicesHONOR FLIG…OATS INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesOATS INCCHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesCHOICES PR…SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterROGERSVILLE SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING INC — $18,008 · Housing & ShelterWEBSTER COUNTY ANNUAL FAIR — $28,000 · Recreation & SportsSOUTHERN WEBSTER COUNTY FOOD PANTRY — $21,600 · Food & NutritionTHE MARSHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUND — $8,990 · Education
Other$497,999Human Services$60,000Housing & Shelter$38,008Recreation & Sports$28,000Food & Nutrition$21,600Education$8,990

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS — $30,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetWEBSTER COUNTY ANNUAL FAIR — $28,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetSOUTHERN WEBSTER COUNTY FOOD PANTRY — $21,600 over 2y, 20% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $20,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetOATS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROGERSVILLE SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING INC — $18,008 over 2y, 14% of budgetMarshfield Senior Center — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetTHE MARSHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUND — $8,990 over 1y, 24% of budgetWEBCO CUSTOM INDUSTRIES INC — $6,100 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFORDLAND SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING IN — $5,800 over 1y, 9.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS
  • Who funds WEBSTER COUNTY ANNUAL FAIR
  • Who funds SOUTHERN WEBSTER COUNTY FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds OATS INC
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC
  • Who funds ROGERSVILLE SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING INC
  • Who funds Marshfield Senior Center
  • Who funds ROGERSVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERC
  • Who funds CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE MARSHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUND
  • Who funds WEBCO CUSTOM INDUSTRIES INC
  • Who funds FORDLAND SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING IN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO20.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Webster Electric Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Webster Electric Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Webster Electric Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph