Skip to content

· Private foundation

Webermeier W Schlrshp Fd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$148kInternational$2k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$397k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGIS UNIV FBO HANNAH KEPLER$4,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
NORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FBO SYDNEY$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE FBO ALLYSON TAYLOR$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
CARLETON COLLEGE FBO AUTUMN WISSENBURG$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
CONCORDIA UNIV FBO KAITLIN KONTOR$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
OR
SD
IA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
KS
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$106k · 30 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
42

Total granted

$106k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+10%

Still filing today

3%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN
    3× · 2018–2021 · $17k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA
    2× · 2018–2019 · $8k
  • WS
    WAYNE STATE COLLEGE
    3× · 2018–2021 · $7k

Funded once

  • HC
    HESSTON COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +15%
  • PT
    PAYTRA TEBRINK CO WAYNE STATE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • MD
    MADAUX DELONG CO UNIVERSITY OF
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
2
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
3
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
4
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
5
Concordia University Chicago

Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

Education
6
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
7
Geneva College

Geneva college is a christ-centered academic community that provides a comprehensive education to equip students for faithful and fruitful service to god and neighbor.

Education
8
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
9
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
12
Concordia College Corporation

The purpose of concordia college is to influence the affairs of the world by sending into society thoughtful and informed men and women dedicated to the christian life.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concordia University; the most unlike its peers is Concordia University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN: $17,207 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLNUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $7,977 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKAWAYNE STATE COLLEGE: $7,277 · OtherREGIS UNIV FBO HANNAH KEPLER: $7,167 · Other+62 more: $102,566 · Other+62 moreMIDLAND UNIVERSITY: $2,659 · EducationHESSTON COLLEGE: $1,750 · EducationREGIS UNIVERSITY: $947 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $947 · EducationLUTHER COLLEGE: $875 · EducationAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $875 · Education
Other$142,194Education$8,053

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIDLAND UNIVERSITY: $2,659 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $1,784 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHESSTON COLLEGE: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIS UNIVERSITY: $947 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $947 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEastern Mennonite University: $909 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $875 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIDLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HESSTON COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Webermeier W Schlrshp Fd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Webermeier W Schlrshp Fd. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Webermeier W Schlrshp Fd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph