Skip to content

· Private foundation

We Can Be Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$63kHealth$12kEducation$12kYouth Development$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kArts & Culture$3kAnimals$2kCrime & Legal$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,909
Median grant
3
States reached
$161k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARKINSONS SUPPORT GROUP$5,727
MO EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES$4,773
TEDI BEAR CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTE$4,773
COMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES$1,909
Individual grant recipient$1,909
IMMIGRANT WELCOME NETWROK OF IA CIT$1,309
CENTER FOR WORKER JUSTICE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$57k · 3 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
19

Total granted

$57k
$45k

Still filing today

0%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Y
    YMCA
    6× · 2017–2022 · $49k
  • CL
    CHILD LIFE FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k

Funded once

  • UA
    UNITED ACTION FOR YOUTH
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +4%
  • TC
    TUTORING CHICAGO
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue -5%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Thomas Jefferson School

Thomas jefferson school engages its students in the education necessary to live as responsible citizens of the world. through the strongest possible college-prepatory program and within a nurturing community, students develop a…

—
2
Community Foundation of Central Mo

The community foundation of central missouri inspires and nurtures philanthropy for the public good.

Philanthropy
3
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
4
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
5
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
6
Northern Illinois Food Bank

With the support of our community, we provide over 90 million meals annually through our network of over 900 member food pantries and programs across thirteen counties, currently reaching over a half million individuals each month with…

Food & Nutrition
7
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
8
Central Illinois Foodbank Inc

The Foodbank's mission is to provide food, and develop awareness of and creative solutions for food insecurity. Annually, the Foodbank distributes approximately 9.5 million pounds of food to 130 food pantries, soup kitchens, children's…

Food & Nutrition
9
Missouri Council of School Administrator

Representation and support of missouri educators.

—
10
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
11
Child Safe of Central Missouri Inc

Child safe of central missouri's mission is to respond to and prevent child abuse by providing advocacy, support, and resources to children who are alleged victims of abuse and other traumatic crimes, and to their non-offending family…

Crime & Legal
12
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Foundation for the Iowa City Community School District; the most unlike its peers is Daughters of Worth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YMCA: $48,585 · OtherYMCAPARKINSONS SUPPORT GROUP: $5,727 · OtherPARKINSONS SUPPORT GROUPCHILD LIFE FUND: $4,959 · OtherTEDI BEAR CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTE: $4,773 · OtherMO EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES: $4,773 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,073 · OtherCOMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES: $3,818 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,250 · OtherFDN FOR THE IA CITY COMM SCH DIST: $3,240 · Other+10 more: $13,986 · Other+10 moreUNITED ACTION FOR YOUTH: $6,000 · Human ServicesNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $1,909 · Human ServicesHIGHLAND PARK COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL: $3,818 · EducationWILSON EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,654 · EducationCOLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,620 · EducationTUTORING CHICAGO: $4,300 · Arts & CultureDAUGHTERS OF WORTH: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentCENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,909 · AnimalsTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$97,184Human Services$7,909Education$7,092Arts & Culture$4,300Youth Development$2,500Animals$1,909Food & Nutrition$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED ACTION FOR YOUTH: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTUTORING CHICAGO: $4,300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL: $3,818 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDAUGHTERS OF WORTH: $2,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $1,909 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,909 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILSON EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,654 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,620 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE IOWA CITY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $809 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED ACTION FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds TUTORING CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds DAUGHTERS OF WORTH ↗
  • Who funds NURSES FOR NEWBORNS ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WILSON EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR THE IOWA CITY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization We Can Be Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from We Can Be Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on We Can Be Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph