Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wayne Eisenbaum Charitable Foundati

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$720kHousing & Shelter$360kHuman Services$305kHealth$220kEnvironment$180kInternational$180kPhilanthropy$165kPublic Safety & Disaster$160kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$121k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
ST VINCENT DEPAUL$20,000
FISH$20,000
ST VINCENT DEPAUL$20,000
PRIME TIME HOUSE INC$20,000
HOUSE OF BREAD$20,000
SHORELINE SOUP KITCHENS$20,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$20,000
CT FOODSHARE$20,000
HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,000
OPERATION FUEL INC$20,000
MARIA SEYMOUR BROOKER MEMORIAL$15,000
CT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,000
SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT$10,000
THE INDEPENDENCE FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $215k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT: $10k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%LARC: $30k → 9%LARC: $20k → 9%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $10k → 9%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $10k → 9%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $10k → 9%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $10k → 9%GIFTS OF LOVE: $10k → 11%GIFTS OF LOVE INC: $5k → 11%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $10k → 9%GIFTS OF LOVE: $5k → 11%GIFTS OF LOVE: $5k → 11%FARM TO FAMILY: $5k → 11%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $10k → 9%GIFTS OF LOVE INC: $5k → 11%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $10k → 9%GIFTS OF LOVE: $5k → 11%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $10k → 9%GIFTS OF LOVE: $5k → 11%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $5k → 9%GIFTS OF LOVE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Wayne Eisenbaum Charitable Foundati’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 79% of the giving stays in CT; by stated purpose, 71%.

Wayne Eisenbaum Charitable Foundatilessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 18 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$2.3M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+38%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterInternationalPublic BenefitAnimalsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    OPERATION FUEL INCORPORATED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +29%
  • TI
    The Independence Fund Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $160k · revenue +13%
  • PT
    PRIME TIME HOUSE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $140k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • FI
    FELLOWSHIP IN SERVING HUMANITY
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • WW
    WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Housing & Shelter Corporation

Mercy housing and shelter corporation provides housing assistance and supportive services to persons who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. mercy works to empower its clients to become independent, so they may live and work with…

Housing & Shelter
2
Veterans Inc

Veterans inc.'s mission is to end homelessness among veterans by helping veterans regain control of their lives. we believe that all veterans have earned respect and gratitude from our nation. this belief is translated into the philosophy…

Community Improvement
3
Abby Kelley Foster House Inc

To provide shelter and affordable housing, as well as advocacy and support services, to homeless, battered and low-income women, with or without children. abby's house empowers the women we serve to lead self-directed lives filled with…

Housing & Shelter
4
Womens Resource Center of Newport and Bristol Counties

The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.

Human Services
5
Preble Street

To provide accessible barrier-free services to empower people experiencing problems with homelessness, housing, hunger, and poverty and to advocate for solutions to those problems.

Human Services
6
Inspirica Inc

Inspirica is one of the largest providers of emergency housing, permanent supportive housing and support services in connecticut. each night, we house over 500 people including children. we operate 12 facilities in stamford and provide an…

—
7
Workforce Alliance Inc

Provide job training through various programs.

—
8
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
9
Jewish Family Services of Greenwich

Jewish family services of greenwich (jfs) is a nonprofit social service agency dedicated to strengthening individuals and families in fairfield and new london counties. jfs provides behavioral health counseling, food security programs,…

—
10
New Hope Inc

New hope engages survivors, stakeholders and communities to build an anti-violence movement. using a trauma-informed practice, we work with those impacted by sexual and domestic violence, as well as those persons who use abuse in their…

Human Services
11
Viability Inc

Viability's mission is to build a world in which individuals with disabilities and other disadvantages realize acceptance, inclusion, and access.

Employment
12
United States Veterans Initiative

The successful transition of military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Fuel Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $360,000 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAULHOUSE OF BREAD INC: $180,000 · OtherHOUSE OF BREAD INCSHORELINE SOUP KITCHENS: $180,000 · OtherSHORELINE SOUP KITCHENSFISH: $160,000 · OtherFISHST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $150,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCHIndividual grant recipient: $140,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOODSHARE INC: $100,000 · OtherFOODSHARE INCCT FOODSHARE: $80,000 · OtherCT FOODSHARE+2 more: $40,000 · OtherSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesSUSAN B A…GIFTS OF LOVE INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesGIFTS OF …THE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC O…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,000 · Human ServicesAmerican …WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION FUEL INCORPORATED: $180,000 · Housing & ShelterHAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $180,000 · InternationalTHE CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $135,000 · PhilanthropyMARIA SEYMOUR BROOKER MEMORIAL: $30,000 · PhilanthropyThe Independence Fund Inc: $160,000 · Public BenefitPRIME TIME HOUSE INC: $140,000 · EmploymentTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $50,000 · Animals
Other$1,390,000Human Services$215,000Housing & Shelter$180,000International$180,000Philanthropy$165,000Public Benefit$160,000Employment$140,000Animals$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION FUEL INCORPORATED: $180,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetHOUSE OF BREAD INC: $180,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetHAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $180,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetThe Independence Fund Inc: $160,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetPRIME TIME HOUSE INC: $140,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetTHE CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFOODSHARE INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $85,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetGIFTS OF LOVE INC: $50,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMARIA SEYMOUR BROOKER MEMORIAL: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPERATION FUEL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF BREAD INC ↗
  • Who funds HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Independence Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRIME TIME HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GIFTS OF LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIA SEYMOUR BROOKER MEMORIAL ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aetna Foundation IncCT16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aetna Foundation Inc · Union Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Northwest Connecticut Community Foundation Inc · American Savings Foundation Inc · Thomaston Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Torrington Savings Foundation · Foundation for Community Health Inc · The Maximilian E and Marion O Hoffman Foundation Inc · Northwest Community Bank Foundation Inc · The Connecticut Community Foundation · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wayne Eisenbaum Charitable Foundati funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wayne Eisenbaum Charitable Foundati. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 50%
  • The Arc of Litchfield County Inc: 97% of income from government
  • Operation Fuel Incorporated: 51% of income from government
  • Prime Time House Inc: 50% of income from government
  • Maria Seymour Brooker Memorial: 1% of income from government
  • Susan B Anthony Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wayne Eisenbaum Charitable Foundati’s filings →

More from the funding graph