Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (W)

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2026still arriving
15
Grants FY2026still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$77kHuman Services$53kEducation$35kHealth$35kYouth Development$18kCommunity Improvement$18kReligion$18kEnvironment$15kOther$0
02FY2026 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,234
Median grant
4
States reached
$584k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESLEY WILLOWS RETIREMENT HOME$2,234
GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN IL$2,234
ROCKFORD LIONS CLUB$2,234
COURT STREET UNITED METHODIST$2,234
YMCA$2,234
DEKALB ELKS LODGE #765$2,234
BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCILBSA$2,234
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$2,234
YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS$2,234
CENTER FOR SIGHT & HEARING$2,234
CARTHAGE COLLEGE$2,234
SEACAMP ASSOCIATION INC$2,234
ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY$2,234
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$2,234
ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$2,234
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–26, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $3k → 15%YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $2k → 15%YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $2k → 15%YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $2k → 15%YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $2k → 15%YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $2k → 15%YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $2k → 15%YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $2k → 15%YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$300k · 15 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2026, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$300k
$2k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    9× · 2018–2026 · $26k · revenue +33%
  • YN
    YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS
    9× · 2018–2026 · $20k · revenue +62%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR SIGHT & HEARING
    9× · 2018–2026 · $20k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • MC
    MARATHON COMMUNITY THEATER
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
4
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
5
Lafayette College

Chartered in 1826, lafayette college is dedicated to excellence in undergraduate education. students are engaged in a transformative educational experience that bridges the liberal arts, engineering, and interdisciplinary study. the…

Education
6
Concordia University Chicago

Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

Education
7
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
8
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
11
Northwestern Health Sciences University

Northwestern health sciences university prepares and serves the next generation of professionals and leaders to become vital contributors to the delivery and advancement of health care. our mission is accomplished through educational…

Education
12
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwestern University; the most unlike its peers is Lebanon Girls Softball Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESLEY WILLOWS RETIREMENT HOME: $19,810 · OtherWESLEY WILLOWS RETIREMENT HOMECOURT STREET UNITED METHODIST: $19,810 · OtherCOURT STREET UNITED METHODISTGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN IL: $19,810 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILYMCA: $19,810 · OtherYMCAROCKFORD LIONS CLUB: $19,810 · OtherROCKFORD LIONS CLUBBLACKHAWK AREA COUNCILBSA: $19,810 · OtherBLACKHAWK AREA COUNCILBSADEKALB ELKS LODGE #765: $19,810 · OtherDEKALB ELKS LODGE #765LEBANON GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION: $18,076 · OtherLEBANON GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATIONSEACAMP ASSOCIATION INC: $17,727 · OtherSEACAMP ASSOCIATION INC+1 more: $2,083 · OtherCENTER FOR SIGHT & HEARING: $19,810 · HealthCENTER FOR SIGH…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $19,810 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPIT…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,234 · HealthST JUDE CHILDRE…ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY: $19,810 · EducationROCKFORD UNIVE…CARTHAGE COLLEGE: $19,810 · EducationCARTHAGE COLLE…Northwestern University: $26,365 · Recreation & SportsNorthwest…YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $19,810 · Human Services
Other$176,556Health$41,854Education$39,620Recreation & Sports$26,365Human Services$19,810

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorthwestern University: $26,365 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $19,810 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR SIGHT & HEARING: $19,810 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetROCKFORD UNIVERSITY: $19,810 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $19,810 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCARTHAGE COLLEGE: $19,810 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLEBANON GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION: $18,076 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetSEACAMP ASSOCIATION INC: $17,727 over 8y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR SIGHT & HEARING ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CARTHAGE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LEBANON GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SEACAMP ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (R)IL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (R) · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (W) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (W). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (W)?

Find your warmest path to Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (W) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (W)’s filings →

More from the funding graph