Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (R)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$23kHuman Services$16kEducation$10kHealth$10kYouth Development$5kCommunity Improvement$5kReligion$5kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$593
Median grant
4
States reached
$190k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$1,864
SEACAMP ASSOCIATION INC$593
WESLEY WILLOWS RETIREMENT HOME$593
DEKALB ELKS LODGE #765$593
YWCA$593
GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS$593
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$593
CENTER FOR SIGHT & HEARING$593
BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCILBSA$593
LEBANON GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION$593
COURT STREET UNITED METHODIST$593
CARTHAGE COLLEGE$593
YMCA$593
ROCKFORD LIONS CLUB$593
ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY$593
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $697 → 15%YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $580 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$79k · 16 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$79k
$1k

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    8× · 2018–2025 · $7k · revenue +33%
  • RU
    ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $5k · revenue +16%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR SIGHT & HEARING
    8× · 2018–2025 · $5k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • MC
    MARATHON COMMUNITY THEATER INC
    one grant, 2018 · $659
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN IL
    one grant, 2018 · $659
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
3
Clarkson University

Clarkson university is an independent, nationally recognized technological university whose faculty of teacher-scholars aspires to offer superior instruction and engage in high-quality research and scholarship in engineering, business,…

Education
4
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
8
University of Rio Grande

The university of rio grande/ rio grande community college is america's unique private/public institution of higher education designed to provide learners the opportunity to attain a high-quality, high-value education. our personalized,…

Education
9
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
10
Northwestern Health Sciences University

Northwestern health sciences university prepares and serves the next generation of professionals and leaders to become vital contributors to the delivery and advancement of health care. our mission is accomplished through educational…

Education
11
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
12
Rockhurst University

Rockhurst is a comprehensive university and a supportive community that forms lifelong learners in the catholic, jesuit, liberal arts tradition who engage with the complexities of our world and serve others as compassionate, thoughtful…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwestern University; the most unlike its peers is Lebanon Girls Softball Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YWCA: $5,901 · OtherYWCADEKALB ELKS LODGE #765: $5,879 · OtherDEKALB ELKS LODGE #765COURT STREET UNITED METHODIST: $5,209 · OtherCOURT STREET UNITED METHODISTLEBANON GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION: $5,209 · OtherLEBANON GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATIONBLACKHAWK AREA COUNCILBSA: $5,209 · OtherBLACKHAWK AREA COUNCILBSAROCKFORD LIONS CLUB: $5,209 · OtherROCKFORD LIONS CLUBWESLEY WILLOWS RETIREMENT HOME: $5,209 · OtherWESLEY WILLOWS RETIREMENT HOMESEACAMP ASSOCIATION INC: $4,550 · OtherSEACAMP ASSOCIATION INCYMCA: $3,241 · OtherYMCA+2 more: $1,318 · OtherROCKFORD UNIVERSITY: $5,209 · EducationROCKFORD UNIVE…CARTHAGE COLLEGE: $5,209 · EducationCARTHAGE COLLE…CENTER FOR SIGHT & HEARING: $5,209 · HealthCENTER FOR SIG…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,209 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPI…Northwestern University: $7,171 · Recreation & SportsNorthweste…GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $4,550 · Youth DevelopmentYMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $1,277 · Human Services
Other$46,934Education$10,418Health$10,418Recreation & Sports$7,171Youth Development$4,550Human Services$1,277

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorthwestern University: $7,171 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLEBANON GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION: $5,209 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetROCKFORD UNIVERSITY: $5,209 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR SIGHT & HEARING: $5,209 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,209 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCARTHAGE COLLEGE: $5,209 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $4,550 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSEACAMP ASSOCIATION INC: $4,550 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $1,277 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds LEBANON GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR SIGHT & HEARING ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CARTHAGE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds SEACAMP ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (W)IL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (W) · Ralph J Baudhuin Foundation · Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008 · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (R) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (R). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (R)?

Find your warmest path to Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (R) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wayne & Ruth Diehl Charitable Trust (R)’s filings →

More from the funding graph