Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wayne and Jean Hardy Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$206kHealth$195kHuman Services$70kYouth Development$49kHousing & Shelter$45kCivil Rights$42kInternational$40k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$8,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$20,000
CHURCH MISSIONS NETWORK$15,000
SHERRY'S RUN$15,000
MISSION DIGNITY$8,000
NASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST$6,000
TENNESSEE BAPTIST MISSION BOARD$5,000
WILSON COUNTY CHRISTMAS FOR ALL$5,000
NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GULF BEACH BAPTIST CHURCH: $10k → 12%TENNESSEE BAPTIST MISSION BOARD: $16k → 4%WAVERLY FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $10k → 13%NASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $15k → 14%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ASHEVILLE STORM FAMILIES: $10k → 12%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $20k → 21%MAYFIELD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $10k → 19%TENNESSEE BAPTIST MISSION BOARD: $15k → 4%NASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $6k → 14%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15k → 21%TENNESSEE BAPTIST MISSION BOARD: $5k → 4%NASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $6k → 14%SAMARITANS PURSE: $5k → 21%TENNESSEE BAPTIST MISSION BOARD: $5k → 4%NASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $6k → 14%NASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $6k → 14%NASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Wayne and Jean Hardy Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 83% of the giving stays in TN; by stated purpose, 0%.

Wayne and Jean Hardy Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$602k · 10 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$602k
$40k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SHERRY'S HOPE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +41%
  • CM
    CHURCH MISSIONS NETWORK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +56%
  • NY
    NASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $49k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • MF
    MAYFIELD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • GB
    GULF BEACH BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ASHEVILLE STORM FAMILIES
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $65,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITALNASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC: $49,000 · OtherNASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST INCMISSION DIGNITY: $42,200 · OtherMISSION DIGNITYTENNESSEE BAPTIST MISSION BOARD: $41,000 · OtherTENNESSEE BAPTIST MISSION BOARDCHRISTMAS FOR ALL: $40,000 · OtherCHRISTMAS FOR ALLTENNESSEE BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOMES INC: $25,000 · OtherTENNESSEE BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOMES INC+4 more: $40,000 · Other+4 moreCHURCH MISSIONS NETWORK: $125,000 · ReligionCHURCH MISSIONS NETWORKSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $40,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSESHERRY'S HOPE INC: $130,000 · HealthSHERRY'S HOPE INCNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterWILSON COUNTY CHRISTMAS FOR ALL: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$302,200Religion$165,000Health$130,000Housing & Shelter$45,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHERRY'S HOPE INC: $130,000 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetCHURCH MISSIONS NETWORK: $125,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetNASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC: $49,000 over 7y, 5.4% of budgetNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILSON COUNTY CHRISTMAS FOR ALL: $5,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHERRY'S HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH MISSIONS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds WILSON COUNTY CHRISTMAS FOR ALL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wayne and Jean Hardy Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wayne and Jean Hardy Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wayne and Jean Hardy Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph