Skip to content

· Private foundation

Watts Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$289k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Community Improvement$600kHuman Services$82kPublic Benefit$66kEducation$56kHealth$50kArts & Culture$42kCrime & Legal$30kReligion$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $149k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARENACO$100,000
CITY OF NORTH LIBERTY$20,833
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$20,000
FREE MEDICAL AND DENTAL CLINIC$15,000
CITY OF KETCHUM$15,000
LIFEWISE ACADEMY$12,500
Individual grant recipient$12,500
VERITAS CHURCH$12,000
RIVERSIDE THEATHER$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HUALALAI OHANA FOUNDATION$10,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NO FOOT TOO SMALL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $5k → 9%WAYPOINT SERVICES: $5k → 9%DEAFINITELY DOGS: $20k → 9%DEAFINITELY DOGS: $5k → 9%MATTHEW 25: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$899k · 13 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$899k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+46%

Still filing today

38%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    ARENACO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $600k · revenue +969%
  • DV
    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +33%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • BC
    BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • M2
    MATTHEW 25graduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +46%
  • CC
    CAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Iowa Renewable Fuels Association

To promote the common business interests of member companies without profit and without the inuring of income to the benefit of any member company or individual. to present the executive, legislative, judicial and regulatory bodies…

Community Improvement
2
State University of Iowa Foundation

The university of iowa center for advancement's mission is to advance the university of iowa through engagement and philanthropy. we serve our alumni and friends in the state and the region, throughout the country, and around the world. we…

Education
3
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
4
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
5
Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation

This member-supported organization protects and restores iowa's land, water and wildlife for future generations. priorities include permanent land protection, promotion of improved land management and bringing new conservation…

Environment
6
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
7
Impact Development Fund

Impact development fund helps people within our underserved communities seek fulfillment for themselves and their families by providing access to affordable living. we create these opportunities by delivering flexible capital to nonprofit…

Housing & Shelter
8
State University of Iowa Alumni Association

Our mission is to strengthen the university of iowa through alumni engagement. we do this through our communications, alumni programs, and events.

—
9
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
10
Iowa State University Foundation

Aligning donor passion and generosity to advance iowa state university's land grant ideals.

Education
11
Northeast Iowa Community Action Corp

Through dynamic partnerships, quality family services, advocacy and education, neicac advances community development and improves social and economic conditions for individuals and families with limited resources.

Human Services
12
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waypoint Services; the most unlike its peers is Arenaco. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARENACO: $600,000 · Recreation & SportsARENACOCITY OF NORTH LIBERTY: $41,666 · OtherCITY OF NORTH LIBERTYIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient4THEKIDZ: $35,000 · Other4THEKIDZRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $30,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM: $30,000 · OtherDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROG…FREE MEDICAL AND DENTAL CLINIC: $25,000 · OtherFREE MEDICAL AND DENTAL CLINICIOWA CITY BIKE LIBRARY: $20,000 · OtherIOWA CITY BIKE LIBRARYCITY OF KETCHUM: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherLIFEWISE ACADEMY: $12,500 · OtherVERITAS CHURCH: $12,000 · OtherBUTCH PETERSON LEGACY FOUNDATION: $11,400 · Other+11 more: $37,806 · Other+11 moreUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationHUALALAI OHANA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationDEAFINITELY DOGS: $25,000 · Human ServicesMATTHEW 25: $5,000 · Human ServicesCAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA: $5,000 · Human ServicesWAYPOINT SERVICES: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $15,000 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW BOHEMIAN INNOVATION COLLABORATIVE INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyRIVERSIDE THEATRE CO: $11,000 · Arts & CultureNO FOOT TOO SMALL: $9,400 · Public Benefit
Recreation & Sports$600,000Other$322,872Education$41,000Human Services$40,000Philanthropy$21,000Arts & Culture$11,000Public Benefit$9,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARENACO: $600,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDEAFINITELY DOGS: $25,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRIVERSIDE THEATRE CO: $11,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNO FOOT TOO SMALL: $9,400 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMATTHEW 25: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWAYPOINT SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH LIBERTY COMMUNITY PANTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHELTER HOUSE COMMUNITY SHELTER AND TRANSITION SERVICES: $2,306 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARENACO ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DEAFINITELY DOGS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JOHNSON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE CO ↗
  • Who funds HUALALAI OHANA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NO FOOT TOO SMALL ↗
  • Who funds MATTHEW 25 ↗
  • Who funds CAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds WAYPOINT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW BOHEMIAN INNOVATION COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH LIBERTY COMMUNITY PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER HOUSE COMMUNITY SHELTER AND TRANSITION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI27.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · GreenState Credit Union · Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation · Hodge Family Foundation · Rpc Inc Charitable Foundation · Hawkeye Area Community Action Program Inc · Community Foundation of Johnson County · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Rohde Family Charitable Foundation · The Accel Foundation · The Kenneth K Kinsey Family Foundation · Midwestone Bank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Watts Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Watts Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Watts Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Watts Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Watts Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph