· Public charity
Watsi Inc
Watsi, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k1 grant · $1k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $124k
- $250k+2 grants · $861k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AFRICAN MISSION HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $589,740 |
| CHILDRENS SURGICAL CENTRE | $270,833 |
| BURMA CHILDREN MEDICAL FUND | $124,091 |
| HAITI CARDIAC ALLIANCE | $11,430 |
| WORLD ALTERING MEDICINE | $1,191 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $542k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $1.6M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: MEDICAL TREATMENT TO PATIENTS
Stated purpose: MEDICAL TREATMENT TO PATIENTS
Stated purpose: MEDICAL TREATMENT TO PATIENTS
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AMAfrican Mission Healthcare Foundation4× · 2017–2020 · $2.8M · revenue +108%
- WKWuqu Kawoq SA3× · 2017–2019 · $542k · revenue +324% · 45% of their budget
- ICINTERNATIONAL CARDIAC ALLIANCE INC4× · 2017–2020 · $478k · revenue +81% · 51% of their budget
Funded once
- ICINTERNATIONAL CARE MINISTRIESgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $184k · revenue +83%
- NHNYAYA HEALTHone grant, 2017 · $58k · revenue -66%
- IHINNOVATING HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2017 · $58k · revenue +55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Access Health Africa's medical service programming focuses on community-level interventions. Due to the decentralized nature of life in Malawi and the overburdened formal health sector, effective interventions happen at the community level…
Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…
To provide medical vouunteers where needed
Mission work
We serve needy families in Mali who find themselves in medical crisis. Since our founding in 2008, we have helped hundreds of patients access life saving medical care, by paying for medicines, medical tests, and surgeries. We treat complex…
To provide sustainable, equitable and effecient health care services to the most vulnerable individuals and communities around the world.
Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…
Provide free medical assistance to poor people in 3rd world countries
Medical care and education to under-served communities around the world.
Provided medical training to healthcare provides in selected markets throughout the world.
Nondenominational international Christian mission dedicated to providing excellent medical care to the poor and quality medical education to the healthcare community of Cambodia
Reduce maternal mortality in low resource areas through education and healthcare infrastructure. Each program is a specific partnership with community led projects to improve quality of health care service delivery, improve systems and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is African Mission Healthcare Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Jonathan & Faye Kellerman Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds African Mission Healthcare Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SURGICAL CENTRE ↗
- Who funds BURMA BORDER PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds Wuqu Kawoq SA ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CARDIAC ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD ALTERING MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CARE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds JONATHAN & FAYE KELLERMAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NYAYA HEALTH ↗
- Who funds INNOVATING HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds MISSIONRESTORE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Watsi Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.