Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Watermark Auto Group Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$139kYouth Development$78kArts & Culture$58kReligion$54kCommunity Improvement$53kInternational$50kPublic Benefit$48kPhilanthropy$27kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REND LAKE COLLEGE FOUNDATION$6,000
REFUGE TEMPLE CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST INC$2,500
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
MARION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION$1,000
BOOK FOR HOPE INC$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FOWLER-BONAN FOUNDATION: $3k → 19%LIGHTHOUSE SHELTER: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$441k · 18 repeat orgs$168k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
20

Total granted

$441k
$168k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+22%

Still filing today

61%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MARION MEDICAL MISSION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $47k · revenue +39%
  • TP
    THE PROMISE MISSION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $34k · revenue +81%
  • AC
    Artstarts Company
    5× · 2017–2022 · $28k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • CO
    CITY OF MARION
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • MS
    MARKET STREET MUSIC CONSERVATORY
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catalyst Rescue Mission Inc

To help end homelessness in southern indiana by providing shelter, case management, life skills training, and social services that propel people into housing permanency.

Housing & Shelter
2
Son Light Missions

The purpose of slm is to carry on and support christian missionay work throughout the world; to provide economic and material assistance to the needy; and to provide medical and other assistance to those in need of such help.

International
3
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Indiana-Michiana Inc

The mission of ronald mcdonald house charities of indiana - michiana is to provide a "home-away-from-home" for families of seriously ill children.

4
Heartland Housed

To transform the landscape of homelessness in springfield and sangamon county, il.

Housing & Shelter
5
Illinois Peo Home Fund Inc

To provide financial assistance toward housing for senior women in need.

6
Casa of West Central Illinois

To advocate for abused and neglected children in the legal welfare system.

Crime & Legal
7
Central Illinois Services

To foster low income housing, develop and promote affordable homeownership and rental opportunities, support community develpment, social services, and educational opportunities for individuals and families throughout menard county and the…

8
Indiana Dream Center Inc

To provide a christ centered shelter to meet basic needs of housing, clothing, food, emotional and spirtitual needs.

Housing & Shelter
9
Southwestern Illinois College Foundation

To maintain and enhance the quality of life by developing friends and funds for support of the educational, cultural, and service goals of southwestern illinois college. the foundation promotes excellence by securing gifts for special…

Education
10
Shelter Inc

Shelter's mission is to end the cycle of child abuse by providing a comprehensive network of support to children, their families, and our community to create safe, health, and nurturing homes.

Housing & Shelter
11
Inner City Mission of Springfield

The mission of inner city mission is to provide what is needed to help homeless children, their parents, and single women find their way home.

Religion
12
Veterans Foundation of Illinois Inc

To promote and fund veteran programs supporting veteran service organizations.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hole in the Wall Gang Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Market Street Music Conservatory. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Schools and Healt…Paducah Community Organizat…Disability & Behavioral Hea…Youth Activity & Community …Fraternal Service Organizat…Faith-Based Emergency Assis…Regional Industry & Communi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 29. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%0%<5yr9%9%5–10yr15%18%10–20yr13%30%20–35yr14%24%35–55yr32%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr9%5%5–10yr15%22%10–20yr13%45%20–35yr14%24%35–55yr32%4%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
9%
133/1,474

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARION CUSD NO 2 — $80,250 · OtherMARION CUSD NO 2Individual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMARION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION — $45,000 · OtherMARION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATIONCITY OF MARION — $40,000 · OtherCITY OF MARIONREFUGE TEMPLE CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST INC — $20,000 · OtherREFUGE TEMPLE CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST INCMARKET STREET MUSIC CONSERVATORY — $20,000 · OtherMARKET STREET MUSIC CONSERVATORYUNIT 2 PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $12,650 · Other+24 more — $100,300 · Other+24 moreBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOI — $75,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS…+1 more — $500 · Youth DevelopmentMARION MEDICAL MISSION — $46,500 · InternationalTHE PROMISE MISSION — $33,692 · ReligionREND LAKE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationArtstarts Company — $27,900 · Arts & CultureSouthern Illinois Community Foundation — $27,000 · Philanthropy
Other$368,200Youth Development$76,000International$46,500Religion$33,692Education$30,000Arts & Culture$27,900Philanthropy$27,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOI — $75,500 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetMARION MEDICAL MISSION — $46,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE PROMISE MISSION — $33,692 over 6y, 18% of budgetREND LAKE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetArtstarts Company — $27,900 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetSouthern Illinois Community Foundation — $27,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMARKET STREET MUSIC CONSERVATORY — $20,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetROTARY DISTRICT 6510 CHARITIES — $7,500 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetSURVIVOR EMPOWERMENT CENTER INC — $7,400 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VOYAGE SENIOR LIVING — $6,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOOK FOR HOPE INC — $5,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCLARITY WOMENS CARE — $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetPONY BASEBALL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE SHELTER — $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCOCHLEAR IMPLANT AWARENESS FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMARION MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE — $3,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCENTERSTONE OF ILLINOIS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVICTORY THROUGH GRACE MINISTRIES — $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetVETERANS HONOR FLIGHT OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS — $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMENTORS 4 KIDS INC — $2,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetJOHN A LOGAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fred G Harrison FoundationIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fred G Harrison Foundation · Broemmel Foundation · Freedom Foundation Inc · Southern Illinois Hospital Services · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Watermark Auto Group Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph