Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Waterford Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1000k
Granted FY2022
12
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$143k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192022.

Health$778kEducation$733kFood & Nutrition$559kReligion$392kHousing & Shelter$353kHuman Services$220kCrime & Legal$165k
02FY2022 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $907k
$82,910
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK$143,310
FOUNDATION FOR CLOVIS SCHOOLS$103,410
FRESNO RESCUE MISSION$95,510
BREAKING THE CHAINS$86,110
FOUNDATION FOR CENTRAL SCHOOLS$83,410
FOUNDATION FOR SANGER SCHOOLS$82,910
ANGELS OF GRACE INC$82,410
THE ART OF LIFE CANCER FOUNDATION$80,610
PARENTS AND ADDICTS IN NEED$75,910
CASA OF FRESNO AND MADERA COUNTIES$73,710
FRESNO POLICE CHAPLAINCY$47,600
HINDS HOSPICE$44,700
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $441k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%ANGELS OF GRACE INC: $82k → 19%ANGELS OF GRACE INC: $56k → 19%ANGELS OF GRACE INC: $42k → 19%ANGELS OF GRACE INC: $39k → 19%HINDS HOSPICE: $64k → 19%HINDS HOSPICE: $63k → 19%HINDS HOSPICE: $50k → 19%HINDS HOSPICE: $45k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 11 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$3.1M
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+48%

Still filing today

91%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
EducationHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK
    4× · 2019–2022 · $559k · revenue +92%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR CLOVIS SCHOOLS
    4× · 2019–2022 · $329k · revenue +122% · 47% of their budget
  • BT
    BREAKING THE CHAINS
    4× · 2019–2022 · $257k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • FR
    FRESNO RESCUE MISSION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $96k · revenue +48%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Services of Tulare County Inc

The mission of Family Services is to help children, adults, and families throughout Tulare County heal from violence and thrive in healthy relationships. Family Services will accomplish this mission through direct services, advocacy,…

Human Services
2
Court Appointed Special Advocates (Casa) of Merced County

Advocate for foster care children in courts. Providing quality intervention and advocacy services for abused, abandoned, and neglected children.

Crime & Legal
3
Family Promise of Sacramento

To provide temporary shelter and assistance to homeless families, and also to provide rental assistance in an effort to prevent families from becoming homeless. Program goal is to assist the families in their efforts to become…

Education
4
Fresno Humane Animal Services

To improve the quality of life for Fresno County's animals by providing a full range of progressive animal control services. We focus on education, animal reunification, adoption, as well as community safety. We Protect the public,educate…

Animals
5
Central Valley Foster Care Inc

Operation of a foster family care agency

Human Services
6
Fresno Fire Chief's Foundation

Provide children and adults in the communtiy with helmets and fire safety materials and information.

Philanthropy
7
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Union County Inc

Recruit, train and supervise volunteers to advocate for abused, neglected and abandoned children placed in foster homes. CASA volunteers ensure children's best interests remain the priority and their needs met while working to establish a…

8
The Fistula Foundation

Fistula Foundation works to end the suffering caused by the childbirth injury obstetric fistula by getting as many women treated as possible. Additionally, the Foundation is focused on increasing the number of trained obstetric fistula…

Health
9
Our Valley Cares Foundation

To be a supporting organization of the fresno rescue mission, inc. acting as a trustee in receiving, investing, managing, administrating, and distributing designated funds for the ministries of the mission.

Philanthropy
10
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Sacramento County

Ensuring consistency and support for children in the foster care system through the use of volunteer advocates advancing the best interests of each child.

Civil Rights
11
California Narcotic Officers Association Survivors Memorial Fund

To provide relief for the immediate economic hardship of the spouse or other close family members of any peace officer in the state of California who loses his or her life while enforcing narcotic laws.

12
California State University Foundation

Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fresno Rescue Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Angels of Grace Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FOUNDATION FOR CLOVIS SCHOOLS — $329,326 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR CLOVIS SCH…The Foundation for Sanger Schools — $254,325 · EducationThe Foundation for Sanger…Foundation for Central Schools — $149,570 · EducationFoundation for Central Sc…CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK — $559,226 · Food & NutritionCENTRAL CALIFORNIA …Art of Life Cancer Foundation Inc — $285,325 · HealthArt of Life Cancer …PAIN PARENTS AND ADDICTS IN NEED — $271,526 · HealthPAIN PARENTS AND AD…Hinds Hospice — $221,315 · Human ServicesHinds HospiceANGELS OF GRACE INC — $219,715 · Human ServicesANGELS OF GRACE…FRESNO POLICE CHAPLAINCY — $392,115 · OtherFRESNO POLICE…BREAKING THE CHAINS — $257,126 · Housing & ShelterBREAKING THE…FRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC — $95,510 · Housing & ShelterFRESNO RESCU…Court Appointed Special Advocates of Fresno and Madera Counties — $164,521 · Civil Rights
Education$733,221Food & Nutrition$559,226Health$556,851Human Services$441,030Other$392,115Housing & Shelter$352,636Civil Rights$164,521

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK — $559,226 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CLOVIS SCHOOLS — $329,326 over 4y, 47% of budgetArt of Life Cancer Foundation Inc — $285,325 over 4y, 36% of budgetPAIN PARENTS AND ADDICTS IN NEED — $271,526 over 4y, 34% of budgetBREAKING THE CHAINS — $257,126 over 4y, 13% of budgetThe Foundation for Sanger Schools — $254,325 over 4y, 60% of budgetHinds Hospice — $221,315 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetANGELS OF GRACE INC — $219,715 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Fresno and Madera Counties — $164,521 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetFoundation for Central Schools — $149,570 over 2y, 52% of budgetFRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC — $95,510 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Educational Employees Credit UnionCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Educational Employees Credit Union · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Waterford Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Waterford Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Waterford Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph