· Private foundation
Washington County Home for Aged Women Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 74% of WASHINGTON COUNTY HOME FOR AGED WOMEN INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WHITEHALL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $5,000 |
| SOUTH GRANVILLE CONGREGATION CHURCH | $5,000 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HF | $5,000 |
| HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY WORK AND INDEPENDENCE INC | $4,990 |
| SHUSHAN NEWMAN UNITED METHODIST | $4,832 |
| THE CONKLING CENTER | $4,800 |
| GEORGI MUSEUM | $4,500 |
| WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORIC SOCIETY | $4,500 |
| GREENWICH VFW POST 7291 | $3,908 |
| LAKEVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH | $3,720 |
| GLENS FALLS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $3,200 |
| UNITED CHURCH OF GRANVILLE | $3,035 |
| BANCROFT PUBLIC LIBRARY | $3,000 |
| CAMBRIDGE FOOD PANTRY | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
38 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHAYNES HOUSE OF HOPE INC8× · 2018–2025 · $20k · revenue +147%
- TCTHE CONKLING CENTER INC8× · 2018–2025 · $17k · revenue +3%
- SFSALEM FOOD PANTRY5× · 2019–2023 · $15k · revenue +450% · 26% of their budget
Funded once
- CFCOUNCIL FOR PREVENTION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +124%
- FHFORT HUDSON CERT HOME HEALTH AGNCYone grant, 2022 · $5k
- HSHISTORICAL SALEM COURTHOUSEone grant, 2024 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preservation & maintenance collection
To preserve all documents to educate, engage and inform the residents and visitors concerning Wilmington, the Whiteface Mountain Region and the Adirondack community.
Preserve the history of walton through preservation of documents photos genealogy artifacts. the society publishes of local history interets related to the history of walton ny
To collect and preserve books, pamphlets, maps, manuscripts, photographs, newspapers, periodicals, film, video and digital materials pertaining to the history of Westchester County, to promote the knowledge and understanding of that…
The preservation and study of local history
Collect, preserve, index and make available to the public historical records, documents, text materials etc of steuben county ny
The mission of the Sharon Historical Society is to make all people aware of our history by linking the past with the present in order to inform them of our future. The Sharon Historical Society exists to inspire people's understanding that…
Local historical education and preservation
The organization operates a library for the use of the general public
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Washington County Historical Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fort Ann Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HAYNES HOUSE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY WORK AND INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CONKLING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SALEM FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds PEMBER LIBRARY AND MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH FREE LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds Washington County Historical Society Inc ↗
- Who funds HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE IN ↗
- Who funds FORT EDWARD HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GLENS FALLS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SLATE VALLEY MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FORT HUDSON NURSING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE FOOD PANTRY AND CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds Fort Ann Historical Society ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL FOR PREVENTION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Glens Falls Foundation · Leo Cox Beach Philanthropic Found · The David S & Janet R Sheridan Foundation · Charles R Wood Foundation · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Washington County Home for Aged Women Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Washington County Home for Aged Women Inc?
Find your warmest path to Washington County Home for Aged Women Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.