Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Washington and Lee University

Mission statement of Washington and Lee University: Washington and Lee University provides a liberal arts education that develops students' capacity to think freely, critically, and humanely and to conduct themselves with honor, integrity, and civility.

$79M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$644k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Public Benefit$4.7MCommunity Improvement$260kEducation$170kHealth$101kHuman Services$98kFood & Nutrition$94kRecreation & Sports$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $1,021,621 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $78,618,810 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $77,597,189 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $122k
  • $250k+2 grants · $894k
$24,120
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF LEXINGTON VA$643,608
Main Street Lexington$250,000
Montessori Center for Children Inc$30,000
Rockbridge Area Free Clinic$26,300
Ndponics$24,120
Yellow Brick Road Early Learning Center Inc$19,375
Rockbridge NAACP$12,500
Omicron Delta Kappa Society Inc$10,000
Rockbridge Regional Library$5,718
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $163k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ROCKBRIDGE AREA RELIEF ASSOCIATION: $30k → 12%Yellow Brick Road Early Learning Center: $25k → 12%Kendal at Lexington: $20k → 12%Kendal at Lexington: $20k → 12%Kendal at Lexington: $20k → 12%LEXINGTON RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC: $20k → 12%LEXINGTON RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC: $10k → 12%Rockbridge Area Transportation: $8k → 12%ROCKBRIDGE AREA RELIEF ASSOCIATION: $5k → 12%Rockbridge Area Relief Association: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $12M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South Asia$2.7M · 22% · 30 people

Stated purpose: Scholarship

Sub-Saharan Africa$2.4M · 20% · 25 people

Stated purpose: Scholarship

East Asia and the Pacific$1.8M · 15% · 29 people

Stated purpose: Scholarship

Russia and Neighboring States$1.4M · 12% · 16 people

Stated purpose: Scholarship

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.3M · 10% · 15 people

Stated purpose: Scholarship

Middle East and North Africa$928k · 8% · 10 people

Stated purpose: Scholarship

South America$916k · 7% · 10 people

Stated purpose: Scholarship

North America (Canada and Mexico)$390k · 3% · 4 people

Stated purpose: Scholarship

Central America and the Caribbean$377k · 3% · 5 people

Stated purpose: Scholarship

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.5M · 9 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$5.5M
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+46%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MAIN STREET LEXINGTON
    2× · 2022–2025 · $260k · revenue +241% · 52% of their budget
  • RA
    ROCKBRIDGE AREA FREE CLINIC INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $101k · revenue +21%
  • OD
    OMICRON DELTA KAPPA SOCIETY AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • LG
    LEXINGTON GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUBgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +98%
  • RA
    ROCKBRIDGE AREA TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +46%
  • BT
    BRIDGE TO HOPE FOOD PANTRY LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lexington Retirement Corporation
Human Services
2
Rockbridge Historical Society
3
Roxborough Development Corporation

The roxborough development corporations mission is to provide roxborough residents with high quality shopping, dining and entertainment experiences.

Community Improvement
4
Rockbridge Christmas Basket Inc

Provide food & other holiday gifts to qualifying needy families in rockbridge county, lexington & buena vista, virginia

Human Services
5
Lexington Playcare Center Inc

LPC's mission is to help children become good friends, proficient problem solvers, creative risk takers, and self-governing, accepting classmates. We want them to be as self-sufficient and independent as they can be based on their age and…

Human Services
6
Commerce Lexington Inc

To represent our members, creating the environment and opportunity for economic prosperity and quality living in central kentucky.

7
Bridgewater Home Inc

Assisted Living and Nursing Care

Human Services
8
Knox Co Council On Aging

To provide services for senior citizens in knox county

9
Blue Ridge Health Center Inc

Community health center

10
Rotary Club of Lexington Kentucky Inc

The rotary club of lexington is a service club that provides its membership an opportunity for personal development, professional networking, camaraderie and the chance to make a contribution to their own community and communities around…

11
Bridgewater Village Inc

Retirement housing

Housing & Shelter
12
Downtown Lexington Partnership

Downtown lexington corporation dlc with more than 200 members who represent the largest businesses, the smallest proprietors and entrepreneurs, neighborhood associations, churches, educational institutions, and individuals, is a community…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rockbridge Area Transportation System Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ndponics. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF LEXINGTON VA — $4,761,679 · OtherCITY OF LEXINGTON VA+4 more — $73,718 · OtherMAIN STREET LEXINGTON — $260,000 · Community ImprovementLEXINGTON RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesYELLOW BRICK ROAD EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC — $44,375 · Human ServicesROCKBRIDGE AREA RELIEF ASSOCIATION INC — $40,210 · Human ServicesROCKBRIDGE AREA TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesOMICRON DELTA KAPPA SOCIETY AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 · EducationMONTESSORI CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC D/B/A WOODS CREEK MONTESSORI — $30,000 · EducationROCKBRIDGE AREA FREE CLINIC INC — $101,300 · HealthNDPONICS — $88,628 · Food & Nutrition
Other$4,835,397Community Improvement$260,000Human Services$182,085Education$120,000Health$101,300Food & Nutrition$88,628

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAIN STREET LEXINGTON — $260,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetROCKBRIDGE AREA FREE CLINIC INC — $101,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOMICRON DELTA KAPPA SOCIETY AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetLEXINGTON RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC — $90,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNDPONICS — $88,628 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetYELLOW BRICK ROAD EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC — $44,375 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetROCKBRIDGE AREA RELIEF ASSOCIATION INC — $40,210 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetLEXINGTON GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB — $40,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMONTESSORI CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC D/B/A WOODS CREEK MONTESSORI — $30,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetROCKBRIDGE AREA TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carilion Rockbridge Community HospitalVA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carilion Rockbridge Community Hospital · Community Foundation for RockbridgeBath & Allegh · United Way of Rockbridge Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Washington and Lee University funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph