Skip to content

· Private foundation

Washburn Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$25kHealth$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kEnvironment$6kFood & Nutrition$2kReligion$950Animals$600Housing & Shelter$600
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
5
States reached
$177k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE WISTAR INSTITUTE$3,500
CHRIST CHURCH PRESERVATION TRUST$3,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,000
PHILABUNDANCE$600
NATURE CONSERVANCY$250
WILLISTOWN CONSERVATION TRUST$250
NATURAL LANDS TRUST$250
BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY$250
ST MARTIN'S CHURCH$200
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$100
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$100
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$100
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$63k · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$63k
$0

Still filing today

85%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +39%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +38%
  • Philabundance
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +0%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Conservation International Foundation

    Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

    Environment
    2
    New Jersey Conservation Foundation

    Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

    Environment
    3
    National Audubon Society Inc

    We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

    Environment
    4
    Washington Forest Law Center

    Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

    —
    5
    French and Pickering Creeks Conservation Trust Inc

    To preserve, steward, and connect people to the land in northern chester county pennsylvania. see additional information on schedule o.french & pickering is recognized as a leader in regional land conservation, the organization is…

    Environment
    6
    Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation

    We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)

    Environment
    7
    The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

    The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

    Science & Tech
    8
    West Creek Conservancy

    Our mission is to enrich the lives of all people in northeast ohio by conserving natural habitats, restoring the ecological value of our region's lands and waters, and expanding opportunities to connect people from all cultures to…

    Environment
    9
    Wild Landscapes Inc

    Wild landscapes, inc. (wli) is dedicated to conserving large and connected landscapes globally significant to wildlife and crucial to local communities. our environmental conservation strategy is to empower communities, conservationists,…

    Animals
    10
    Resource Renewal Institute

    The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

    Environment
    11
    African Wildlife Foundation Inc

    Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…

    Animals
    12
    Wildlife Conservation Society

    The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

    Animals
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Natural Lands Trust Inc; the most unlike its peers is Christ Church Preservation Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    12/12
    Grantees still filing
    10/12
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY: $24,000 · HealthTHE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOG…CHRIST CHURCH PRESERVATION TRUST: $22,500 · Arts & CultureCHRIST CHURCH PRESERVATION TRUSTBrandywine Conservancy & Museum of Art: $1,500 · Arts & CultureBrandywine Conservancy & Museum of ArtAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $6,000 · Human ServicesAmerican N…Willistown Conservation Trust Inc: $1,500 · EnvironmentNatural Lands Trust Inc: $1,500 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $600 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $600 · EnvironmentTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,500 · OtherST MARTIN'S CHURCH: $950 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $600 · OtherFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $500 · OtherPhilabundance: $2,350 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $600 · Animals
    Health$24,000Arts & Culture$24,000Human Services$6,000Environment$4,200Other$3,550Food & Nutrition$2,350Animals$600

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIST CHURCH PRESERVATION TRUST: $22,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $2,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBrandywine Conservancy & Museum of Art: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWillistown Conservation Trust Inc: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNatural Lands Trust Inc: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY ↗
    • Who funds CHRIST CHURCH PRESERVATION TRUST ↗
    • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
    • Who funds Philabundance ↗
    • Who funds Brandywine Conservancy & Museum of Art ↗
    • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
    • Who funds Willistown Conservation Trust Inc ↗
    • Who funds Natural Lands Trust Inc ↗
    • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
    • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
    • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
    • Who funds FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Washburn Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Washburn Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Washburn Family’s filings →

      More from the funding graph