Skip to content

· Private foundation

Warmenhoven Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
67
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$2.4MHealth$1.4MInternational$814kYouth Development$800kHuman Services$725kFood & Nutrition$695kSocial Science$400kPhilanthropy$355kOther$0
02FY2024 · 67 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $635k
  • $50k–250k22 grants · $1.8M
$25,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOSEPH FINANCIAL SERVICES$200,000
ST FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL$125,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
CRISTO REY SAN JOSE JESUIT HIGH SCH$100,000
BELLAMINE$100,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$100,000
MARKKULA CENTER FOR APPLIED ETHICS$100,000
ST MARY'S OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEP$100,000
SECOND HARVEST$100,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB SILICON VALLEY$80,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$75,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSP$75,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$70,000
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$50,000
ACE CHARTER SCHOOLS$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $280k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHEER LOVE RWANDA: $10k → 12%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS: $10k → 8%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS: $5k → 8%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS: $5k → 8%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS: $5k → 8%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS: $5k → 8%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE: $10k → 8%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE: $10k → 8%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE: $10k → 8%ALUM ROCK COUNSELING CENTER: $10k → 8%ALUM ROCK COUNSELING CENTER: $10k → 8%ALUM ROCK COUNSELING CENTER: $10k → 8%ALUM ROCK COUNSELING CENTER: $10k → 8%ALUM ROCK COUNSELING CENTER: $10k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS: $10k → 8%PACIFIC CLINICS: $50k → 8%PACIFIC CLINICS: $25k → 8%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 8%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 8%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.3M · 69 repeat orgs$588k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -26% for those funded once.

69 repeat relationships: 58 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

69
12

Total granted

$9.3M
$433k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-26%

Still filing today

51%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +50%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $430k · revenue +361%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $375k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • SC
    SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ED
    one grant, 2023 · $240k
  • LS
    LAUDATO SI CHALLENGE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $55k · revenue 0%
  • WF
    WESLEY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
2
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
3
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
4
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
5
Sv Home

Driving the creation of affordable housing for a more vibrant and equitable silicon valley.

Housing & Shelter
6
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
7
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
8
Silicon Valley Council of Nonprofits

To advance the role, voice, and capacity of the nonprofit community so it can be a force for positive social change and support the creation of equitable, vibrant, and thriving communities.

Education
9
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
10
Silicon Valley Social Venture Fund - SV2

Silicon Valley Social Venture Funds (SV2) mission is to unleash the talents and resources of the Bay Area community to achieve meaningful social impact. SV2 works to build the organizational capacity of our Nonprofit Grantees and Impact…

Philanthropy
11
Breakthrough Silicon Valley

Breakthrough silicon valley prepares highly-motivated students to become first-generation college graduates and inspires emerging leaders to be the next generation of educators and advocates for equity.

Education
12
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Excellence in Nonprofits; the most unlike its peers is Sheer Love Rwanda. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/53
Grantees still filing
32/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST: $545,000 · OtherSECOND HARVESTST FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL: $525,000 · OtherST FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOLBELLAMINE: $390,000 · OtherBELLAMINEALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $370,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONST JOSEPH FINANCIAL SERVICES: $300,000 · OtherENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS: $250,000 · OtherCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $250,000 · OtherSANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ED: $240,000 · OtherCRISTO REY SAN JOSE JESUIT HIGH SCH: $232,500 · Other+56 more: $3,431,400 · Other+56 moreTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $500,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BO…ACE CHARTER SCHOOL: $250,000 · EducationACE CHARTER SC…SACRED HEART NATIVITY SCHOOL: $250,000 · EducationSACRED HEART N…REBUILDING TOGETHER SILICON VALLEY: $125,000 · EducationREBUILDING TOG…AMERICAN LEADERSHIP FORUM - SILICON VALLEY: $50,000 · EducationGROUNDSWELL NETWORK INC: $50,000 · Education+2 more: $45,000 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $325,000 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $235,000 · HealthJW HOUSE: $110,000 · HealthBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY: $430,000 · Youth DevelopmentWORLD YOUTH CLUBS INC: $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHINE TOGETHER INC: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $375,000 · InternationalBest Buddies International Inc: $50,000 · International+2 more: $15,000 · InternationalPACIFIC CLINICS: $150,000 · Human ServicesALUM ROCK COUNSELING CENTER INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesAMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND ENPOWERMENT: $30,000 · Human ServicesPARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $10,000 · Human ServicesSHEER LOVE RWANDA: $10,000 · Human ServicesJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SAN JOSE: $125,000 · Community ImprovementSILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $55,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN NONPROFITS: $50,000 · Community Improvement
Other$6,533,900Education$1,270,000Health$670,000Youth Development$575,000International$440,000Human Services$280,000Community Improvement$230,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY: $430,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $375,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $325,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH FINANCIAL SERVICES: $300,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetACE CHARTER SCHOOL: $250,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $250,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $235,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC: $150,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetPACIFIC CLINICS: $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SILICON VALLEY: $125,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SAN JOSE: $125,000 over 5y, 9.6% of budgetJW HOUSE: $110,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetWORLD YOUTH CLUBS INC: $110,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLAUDATO SI CHALLENGE INC: $55,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC: $55,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN LEADERSHIP FORUM - SILICON VALLEY: $50,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetALUM ROCK COUNSELING CENTER INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGROUNDSWELL NETWORK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetFOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CANARY FUND DBA CANARY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN NONPROFITS: $50,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLaw Foundation of Silicon Valley: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKQED INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNEW BALLET SCHOOL DOWNTOWN SAN JOSE INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHINE TOGETHER INC: $35,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetAMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND ENPOWERMENT: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHOMEFIRST SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFuture Talent of Silicon Valley: $25,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBELLWETHER EDUCATION PARTNERS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STRATHMORE HALL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT GIVING KIDS: $20,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetJOINT VENTURE SILICON VALLEY NETWORK: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmericans for the Arts Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEXERCISE IN THE STREETS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 75% of budgetSILICON VALLEY FACES: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HANDS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWOMAN WORLD LEADERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH FINANCIAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ACE CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ↗
  • Who funds SACRED HEART NATIVITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC CLINICS ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF SAN JOSE ↗
  • Who funds JW HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD YOUTH CLUBS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAUDATO SI CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sobrato Family FoundationCA41.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sobrato Family Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Leo M Shortino Family Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · The Applied Materials Foundation · Rotary Club of San Jose Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Star One Credit Union · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Warmenhoven Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Warmenhoven Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • The Strathmore Hall Foundation Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Warmenhoven Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Warmenhoven Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Warmenhoven Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph