· Public charity
Walter Reed Society Inc
To provide support to wounded soldiers and their families and military health facilities in the national capital region.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $273,484 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $359,663 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $86,179 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $159k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LEASHES OF VALOR | $100,000 |
| NUMOTION | $46,007 |
| ROLL UP N DYE | $25,000 |
| OPERATION KEY WEST | $24,000 |
| BLUE STAR FAMILIES | $20,000 |
| INSTITUTE OF HEARTMATH | $12,084 |
| Individual grant recipient | $11,729 |
| SILVER SPRING TOWN CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY BUILDING ART WORKS | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY UNIT 41 | $9,346 |
| HOMEWOOD SUITES | $5,318 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 13% of Walter Reed Society Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BSBLUE STAR FAMILIES INC2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +39%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches2× · 2017–2018 · $22k · revenue +46%
- IOINSTITUTE OF HEARTMATH2× · 2023–2024 · $21k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- PFPDC FACILITIES INCone grant, 2020 · $46k
- AFAHIMA Foundationone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -71%
- WOWRAMC OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORone grant, 2020 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A community committed to the vision of a world where informatics transforms people's care.
Amga, inc. improves healthcare for patients by supporting multispecialty medical groups and other organized systems of care.
The Academy of Integrative Health & Medicine (AIHM) is a global interprofessional integrative health association working to transform healthcare body, mind, spirt, community & planet. AIHM is the leading professional organization for the…
SIIM's mission is to advance medical imaging informatics through research, education, technical harmonization and a culture of belonging. SIIM accelerates innovation by bringing together our members: scientists, developers, vendors,…
Vitalhearts is a trauma education and training center for care-providers to better respond to the secondary or vicarious trauma encountered in their work. this helps the care-givers to avoid compassion fatigue and burnout, and therefore…
The american association of immunologists (aai) is an international association representing professionally trained scientists who conduct basic and clinical research on the biology of the immune system. aai is dedicated to advancing the…
To advance the health of all individuals and communities. The AHA leads, represents and serves hospitals, health systems and other related organizations that are accountable to the community and committed to equitable care and health…
To prepare individuals and organizations to lead, inspire, and advance healthcare quality and safety across the continuum.
With our partners, we work to improve health and create a better health care system so that people and communities will flourish.
The world's largest professional organization of blood specialists, ash aims to further the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of disorders affecting the blood, bone marrow, and the immunologic, hemostatic and vascular…
Amvets is a veterans service organization whose members, having served or now serving in the u.s. armed forces, are united to uphold and defend the constitution of the united states; to safeguard the principles of freedom, liberty and…
Our mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve. our vision is to be the partner of choice as we transform healthcare for our communities. we will attain our vision through the following: -providing the highest…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Health Information Management Association and the most unlike its peers is Silver Spring Town Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEASHES OF VALOR ↗
- Who funds BLUE STAR FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds AHIMA Foundation ↗
- Who funds American Health Information Management Association ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE OF HEARTMATH ↗
- Who funds SILVER SPRING TOWN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY BUILDING ART WORKS ↗
- Who funds Lutheran Retreat Center At Carefree Arizona Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Walter Reed Society Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Building Art Works — 18% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.