Skip to content

· Private foundation

Walter Kaner Children's Foundation Inc

THE FOUNDATION'S MISSION IS TO ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR ECONOMICALLY AND PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED CHILDREN THROUGHOUT THE NEW YORK METROPOLITAN AREA BY SEEKING TO RAISE SOCIAL AWARENESS.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$147kHealth$45kRecreation & Sports$42kYouth Development$38kArts & Culture$15kHuman Services$15kInternational$3k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$242k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOL-STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP$40,000
LEAGUE OF YES$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WHEATON COLLEGE: $5k → 11%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NY GRANT: $32k → 6%LEAGUE OF YES: $30k → 7%FRIENDS OF KAREN GRANT: $7k → 9%QUEENS OF PEACE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $3k → 11%THE CHILD CENTER OF NY: $15k → 13%FU GENERATION FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 17%BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITYSCHOLARSHIP FOR RYAN MAXWELL: $4k → 20%FAST FEET RUNNING AND ATHELTICS INC: $9k → 20%SPARCSTUDENT SVC CENTER AT MINEOLA HS GRANT: $8k → 6%CAMP GOOD MOURNING GRANT: $12k → 7%FRIENDS OF KAREN GRANT: $7k → 9%QUEENS MUSEUM: $8k → 13%BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITYSCHOLARSHIP FOR RYAN MAXWELL: $1k → 20%SPARCSTUDENT SVC CENTER AT MINEOLA HS GRANT: $8k → 6%CAMP GOOD MOURNING GRANT: $10k → 7%FRIENDS OF KAREN GRANT: $7k → 9%QUEENS MUSEUM: $8k → 13%CAMP GOOD MOURNING GRANT: $9k → 7%HOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOL-STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP: $40k → 13%CAMP GOOD MOURNING GRANT: $6k → 7%HOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOL-STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP: $10k → 13%HOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOL-STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP: $10k → 13%HOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOL-STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP: $5k → 13%HOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 13%ST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC: $30k → 13%ST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC: $10k → 13%ST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$202k · 7 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$202k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+11%

Still filing today

43%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +74%
  • CG
    CAMP GOOD MOURNING INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $38k · revenue +197%
  • QM
    QUEENS MUSEUM OF ART
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NY GRANT
    one grant, 2021 · $32k
  • TC
    THE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +4%
  • FF
    FAST FEET RUNNING AND ATHLETICS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +97%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Southampton Fresh Air Home

The southampton fresh air home is a nonprofit residential center offering summer camp sessions and year-round programs for children and young adults with physical disabilities. our mission is to provide an enriching, recreational and…

Health
2
The Lang School

Founded to educate and inspire gifted and precocious learners who require special social, emotional, executive function and academic supports to realize their high potential, in the greater new york city area, for students grades 1 through…

Education
3
Fantasy Camps for Kids
Recreation & Sports
4
Abilities Inc

Abilites Inc is a non-profit agency dedicated to facilitating integrated employment and full participation of persons with disabilities in their work and living communities. Employment is accomplished through direct service to youth and…

—
5
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
6
Little Flower Children Family Services of New York

Little flower is committed to improving the well-being of the children, families, and individuals with developmental disabilities across nyc and long island so they can reach their full potential. little flower transforms caring into…

Human Services
7
Miracle League of Grand Island & Western New York Inc

Provide opportunities for children & young adults with disabilities to play miracle league baseball, regardless of their abilities, promote community support and sponsorship of a miracle league and promote the construction of special…

Recreation & Sports
8
Female Strong

Female strong is a 501c3 non-profit organization and a community of committed individuals that offer hands-on programs, mentorship, and experiences that build confidence in middle and high school girls. we support the inclusion of all…

Community Improvement
9
Brooke Industries Inc

Brooke industries, inc.'s mission is to provide high quality, innovative service and choice to the rehabilitation and business communities. our motto is to "exceed the expectations" for our consumers, employees and customers.

—
10
Foundation for Abilities First New York

The mission of the foundation for abilities first ny is to garner the financial resources necessary to meet the programmatic interests and to assure the sustainability of the mission of abilities first, inc. fafny will establish a stable…

Human Services
11
Complete Playground Inc

Complete playground is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing inclusive child, teen, and family development by bringing together neurodivergent and neurotypical children, teenagers, and their families in a shared environment of…

Recreation & Sports
12
League School

The league school provides educational (ages 5-21) and mental health programs for students with intellectual, developmental and/or psychiatric disabilities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Child Center of Ny Inc; the most unlike its peers is Queens Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOL-STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP: $65,000 · OtherHOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOL-STUDENT SCHOLARSHIPST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC: $45,000 · OtherST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INCRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NY GRANT: $32,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NY GRANTFRIENDS OF KAREN GRANT: $19,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF KAREN GRANTSPARCSTUDENT SVC CENTER AT MINEOLA HS GRANT: $15,000 · OtherSPARCSTUDENT SVC CENTER AT MINEOLA HS GRANTTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC: $15,000 · OtherTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY INCFAST FEET RUNNING AND ATHLETICS INC: $9,000 · Other+3 more: $12,520 · Other+3 moreCAMP GOOD MOURNING INC: $37,890 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP GOOD MOUR…LEAGUE OF YES: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsLEAGUE OF Y…QUEENS MUSEUM OF ART: $15,000 · Arts & CultureWHEATON COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationFU GENERATION FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · International
Other$213,020Youth Development$37,890Recreation & Sports$30,000Arts & Culture$15,000Education$5,000International$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCAMP GOOD MOURNING INC: $37,890 over 4y, 12% of budgetQUEENS MUSEUM OF ART: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAST FEET RUNNING AND ATHLETICS INC: $9,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetWHEATON COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFU GENERATION FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP GOOD MOURNING INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF YES ↗
  • Who funds QUEENS MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAST FEET RUNNING AND ATHLETICS INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEATON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FU GENERATION FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walter Kaner Children's Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walter Kaner Children's Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wheaton College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Walter Kaner Children's Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Walter Kaner Children's Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Walter Kaner Children's’ filings →

More from the funding graph