Skip to content

· Private foundation

Walsh Fund Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$42kHealth$18kHousing & Shelter$4kHuman Services$2kArts & Culture$500
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$120k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL CO DIRECTOR$3,625
GREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INC$1,500
PATHWAYS INC$1,000
GREENWICH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$875
POSTPARTUM RESOURCE CENTER$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%River House Adult Day Center: $650 → 9%River House Adult Day Center: $625 → 9%River House Adult Day Center: $600 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$61k · 9 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against -32% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$61k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-32%

Still filing today

78%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GE
    GREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +33%
  • GA
    GREENWICH ACADEMY INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +31%
  • GH
    GREENWICH HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $5k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • GH
    GREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue -36%
  • GS
    GREENWICH SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $300 · revenue -32%
  • LF
    Lupus Foundation of America
    one grant, 2017 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
At Home in Greenwich Inc

Provides greenwich residents professional guidance to meet life's challenges and live confidently in their own homes as they grow old.

Human Services
2
Northeast Greenwich Association Incorporated

The purpose of the association is to provide for the protection and general welfare of the residents and owners of real property in the northeastern section of greenwich, connecticut, including the preservation of the residential character…

Community Improvement
3
Yale New Haven Hospital

The mission of ynhh is to provide innovative and excellent patient care, teaching, research, and service to the communities it serves.

Health
4
Greensboro Hospital Associationinc D/B/a Greensboro Nursing Home

Skilled nursing facility providing skilled nursing and rehabilitation services to older adults.

Health
5
The Greenwich Hospital Endowment Fund Inc

Supporting organization of greenwich hospital

Health
6
Brightpoint Health

Brightpoint health drives dramatic improvements in the health of new yorkers. brightpoint health delivers high quality, person centered, integrated care resulting in improved health outcomes for people, families, and communities challenged…

—
7
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
8
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
9
Greenwich Center for Hope and Renewal Inc

The center provides counseling, seminars, and training.

Human Services
10
Greenwich Country Club

To maintain a clubhouse and golf grounds to cultivate a social spirit among its members to provide them with lawful recreation to do generally whatever may serve for the advancement, benefit, diversion or pleasure of the members.

—
11
Friends of Nathaniel Witherell Inc

Friends of nathaniel witherell is a not-for-profit organization committed to raising funds in support of the nathaniel witherell, the skilled nursing and short term rehabilitation center owned and operated by the town of greenwich, ct and…

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Bridgeport Hospital

To operate an acute care hospital in bridgeport, connecticut for the care and treatment of persons suffering from disease or other physical or mental conditions without regard to race, color, creed, sex, age or ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenwich Emergency Medical Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is Greenwich Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL: $29,120 · OtherRED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOLGREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INC: $10,850 · OtherGREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INCRED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL CO DIRECTOR: $3,625 · OtherRED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL CO DIRECTOR+2 more: $500 · OtherGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $4,825 · HealthGREENWICH HOSPITA…PATHWAYS INC: $3,895 · HealthPATHWAYS INCTHE POSTPARTUM RESOURCE CENTER OF NY INC: $750 · HealthTHE POSTPARTUM RE…BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $750 · HealthBREAST CANCER ALL…GREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $7,650 · EducationGREENWICH ACADE…BRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $850 · EducationBRUNSWICK SCHOO…GREENWICH SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION INC: $300 · EducationGREENWICH ADULT DAY CARE INC: $1,875 · Human ServicesGREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$44,095Health$10,220Education$8,800Human Services$1,875Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INC: $10,850 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $7,650 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $4,825 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAYS INC: $3,895 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH ADULT DAY CARE INC: $1,875 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE POSTPARTUM RESOURCE CENTER OF NY INC: $750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH ADULT DAY CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE POSTPARTUM RESOURCE CENTER OF NY INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fairfield County's Community Foundation IncCT13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walsh Fund Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walsh Fund Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 45%
  • Pathways Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Greenwich Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Walsh’s filings →

More from the funding graph