Skip to content

Kansas · Private foundation

Walnut Ridge Land Trust III Ltd

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$127k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$27,000
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$6.6M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$121kEnvironment$28kEmployment$20k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Prospect Kc$20,00012%
Kansas City Community Gardens Inc$20,00011%
Cultivate Kansas City Inc$20,00011%
Petes Garden$20,00012%
Green Works In Kansas City$14,00015%
Kansas Land Trust Inc$14,00014%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($61k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Kansas City IncMO15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Menorah Heritage Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Walnut Ridge Land Trust III Ltd with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Walnut Ridge Land Trust III Ltd?

Find your warmest path to Walnut Ridge Land Trust III Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Walnut Ridge Land Trust III Ltd

How much does Walnut Ridge Land Trust III Ltd give?
Walnut Ridge Land Trust III Ltd reported 6 grants totaling $127,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Walnut Ridge Land Trust III Ltd fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (72%), Environment (17%), Employment (12%).
Who are Walnut Ridge Land Trust III Ltd's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: The Prospect Kc ($20k), Kansas City Community Gardens Inc ($20k), Cultivate Kansas City Inc ($20k).
Does Walnut Ridge Land Trust III Ltd accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Walnut Ridge Land Trust III Ltd?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc, Menorah Heritage Foundation, Greater Kansas City Community Foundation.
Where is Walnut Ridge Land Trust III Ltd based?
Walnut Ridge Land Trust III Ltd is based in KS.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Walnut Ridge Land Trust III Ltd’s filings →

More from the funding graph