Skip to content

· Private foundation

Walden Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$183k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$197kHuman Services$114kYouth Development$74kHealth$69kReligion$58kEducation$39kInternational$36kHousing & Shelter$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $136k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIVER'S EDGE METHODIST CHURCH$30,000
SPENCER REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$15,000
ATLAS OF SPENCER$13,000
ATLAS OF LAKES AREA$13,000
CRESTON AREA FOOD PANTRY$12,500
Individual grant recipient$12,000
CRESTON AREA FOOD SHELF DBA CRESTON FOOD PANTRY INC$10,500
TRI COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$10,000
DICKINSON COUNTY HUNGER COALITION$10,000
LOVE TAKES ROOT$10,000
MORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY$7,500
ORIENT UMC MOBILE FOOD PANTRY$5,000
FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC$5,000
THE OUTREACH$5,000
CROSSWINDS CHURCH-EFCA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $500 → 12%FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC: $10k → 8%CRITTENTON CENTER: $1k → 13%FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC: $5k → 8%LOVE TAKES ROOT: $15k → 9%DES MOINES AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL (DMARC): $2k → 10%FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC: $5k → 8%HOPE MINISTRIES: $1k → 10%ATLAS OF SPENCER: $13k → 9%LOVE TAKES ROOT: $10k → 9%PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $250 → 10%ATLAS OF SPENCER: $8k → 9%ATLAS OF SPENCER: $6k → 9%ATLAS OF SPENCER: $5k → 9%ATLAS OF SPENCER: $5k → 9%LOVE TAKES ROOT: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of Walden Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in IA; by stated purpose, 82%.

Walden Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$561k · 24 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
49

Total granted

$561k
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+44%

Still filing today

29%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SR
    Spencer Regional Healthcare Foundation
    4× · 2022–2025 · $50k · revenue +80%
  • AO
    ATLAS OF SPENCER
    5× · 2020–2025 · $37k · revenue +44%
  • CA
    CRESTON AREA FOOD PANTRY INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $34k · revenue +127%

Funded once

  • BC
    Battle Creek Historical Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • SC
    SPENCER CHAMBER FOUNDATION FLOOD RECOVERY FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • SM
    SIGOURNEY MINISTERIAL ALLIANCECHAP
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
2
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
3
Mid-Iowa Community Action Inc

Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.

Community Improvement
4
South Central Iowa Community Action Program Inc

To provide advocacy and services for disadvantaged persons and bring about institutional change for the benefit of the people we serve and the community at large. (see schedule o).to achieve this mission, scicap operates programs to…

Community Improvement
5
Family Promise of Greater Des Moines

To provide shelter and services to families experiencing homelessness

—
6
Iowa City Hospice Inc

To provide high-quality and compassionate care to community members approaching the end of life.

Human Services
7
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
8
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
9
Peoples Community Health Clinic Inc

Dedicated to providing access to affordable, compassionate, high quality health care for all.

Health
10
Children's Cancer Connection

Connecting families affected by childhood cancer by providing opportunities that encourage relationships and strengthen community.

—
11
Reach for Your Potential Inc

Reach for your potential, inc is a provider of adult daycare services and rehabilitation/housing of disabled individuals serving approximately 135 individuals from iowa city and the surrounding communities.

Housing & Shelter
12
Community Health Centers of Southeastern Iowa Inc

To provide primary health care to residents of the greater se iowa region, especially those individuals/families with limited resources or with other barriers to health care. see schedule o for additional information.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/a Greater Des Moines Community Fdn; the most unlike its peers is Creston Area Food Pantry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
22/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $58,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRI COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $56,000 · OtherTRI COUNTY FOOD PANTRYCRESTON AREA FOOD SHELF DBA CRESTON FOOD PANTRY: $47,500 · OtherCRESTON AREA FOOD SHELF DBA CRESTON FOOD PANTRYATLAS OF LAKES AREA: $35,500 · OtherATLAS OF LAKES AREACRESTON AREA FOOD PANTRY INC: $33,500 · OtherCRESTON AREA FOOD PANTRY INCRIVER'S EDGE METHODIST CHURCH: $32,500 · OtherRIVER'S EDGE METHODIST CHURCHKINGS AND QUEENS LOCAL INC: $27,500 · OtherCROSS WINDS CHURCH EFCA: $24,250 · OtherBattle Creek Historical Foundation: $20,000 · OtherDICKINSON COUNTY HUNGER COALITION: $20,000 · Other+52 more: $171,600 · Other+52 moreATLAS OF SPENCER: $36,750 · Human ServicesATLAS OF SPENC…LOVE TAKES ROOT INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesLOVE TAKES ROO…FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY CRISIS …+5 more: $4,750 · Human ServicesSpencer Regional Healthcare Foundation: $50,050 · HealthGREATER SIOUX COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $2,000 · HealthMORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY: $22,500 · Education+1 more: $250 · EducationCOMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMIDLANDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyOUTREACH INC: $5,000 · InternationalCLIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$526,350Human Services$91,500Health$52,050Education$22,750Philanthropy$7,000International$5,000Food & Nutrition$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSpencer Regional Healthcare Foundation: $50,050 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetATLAS OF SPENCER: $36,750 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetCRESTON AREA FOOD PANTRY INC: $33,500 over 5y, 9.9% of budgetLOVE TAKES ROOT INC: $30,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetMORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCLAY COUNTY HERITAGE: $6,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLANDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER SIOUX COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDES MOINES AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR FINANCIAL EDUCATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE CRITTENTON CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS IOWA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSINGOMAHA INC: $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF LAKESIDE LAB INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Spencer Regional Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ATLAS OF SPENCER ↗
  • Who funds CRESTON AREA FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds LOVE TAKES ROOT INC ↗
  • Who funds MORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CLAY COUNTY HERITAGE ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLANDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA33.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Delta Dental of Iowa Foundation · Meredith Corporation Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Interstates Foundation · Variety - the Children's Charity of Iowa · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Dwight and Marilyn Conover Foundation · The Chesterman Family Foundation · The Merchants Bonding Company Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walden Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walden Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Walden’s filings →

    More from the funding graph