Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wakerly Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$363k
Granted FY2026still arriving
19
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$474kHealth$379kHuman Services$123kFood & Nutrition$117kYouth Development$90kInternational$64kHousing & Shelter$51kPhilanthropy$32kOther$0
02FY2026 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $348k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Brother Rice High School$40,000
ABCD Inc$35,000
Marquette University$33,000
Northern Illinois Food Bank$25,000
People's Resource Center$25,000
New Horizons Foundation$25,000
Cristo Rey Jesuit High School$23,000
Little Sisters of the Poor$20,000
Bartow Family Resources$20,000
Ozaukee Family Services$20,000
Neighborhood House of Milwaukee$15,000
PEARLS for Teen Girls$15,000
Humanitarian Service Project$15,000
Rosie's Place$15,000
Providence St Mel School$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $234k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Ozaukee Family Services: $20k → 6%Bartow Family Resources: $20k → 10%Ozaukee Family Services: $20k → 6%Bartow Family Resources: $15k → 10%Humanitarian Service Project: $15k → 7%Ozaukee Family Services: $20k → 6%Bartow Family Resources: $10k → 10%Humanitarian Service Project: $12k → 7%Ozaukee Family Services: $10k → 6%Bartow Family Resources: $10k → 10%Humanitarian Service Project: $12k → 7%Ozaukee Family Services: $10k → 6%Humanitarian Service Project: $10k → 7%Humanitarian Service Project: $10k → 7%Neighborhood House of Milwaukee: $15k → 17%Humanitarian Service Project: $10k → 7%Neighborhood House of Milwaukee: $10k → 17%Neighborhood House of Milwaukee: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 18 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$1.5M
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+19%

Still filing today

67%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BN
    Bear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $185k · revenue +14%
  • ABCD INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $185k · revenue +48%
  • MU
    Marquette University
    6× · 2021–2026 · $183k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • SH
    Sacred Heart Medical Center Foundation
    one grant, 2025 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
NourishMKE Inc

We're a network of community food centers that specializes in food, love, and community. Hunger is a real problem, and access to food should be a fundamental right. No one should be made to feel they're not deserving of nourishment when…

Food & Nutrition
2
Family Promise of the Chippewa Valley Inc

Advocate for and support families who are homeless in our community by providing temporary housing and support services, and by fostering independence.

Human Services
3
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
4
Beloit Meals on Wheels Inc

Beloit Meals on Wheels seeks to nourish and enrich the lives of homebound seniors to promote dignity and independent living.

Food & Nutrition
5
Kishwaukee United Way

To improve lives by sharing community resources

Philanthropy
6
Living Well Disability Services

Living Well Disability Services transforms the lives of people impacted by disabilities through the delivery of exceptional services.

—
7
Jewish Family Service

Jewish Family Service is a nonprofit social service organization that supports people of all faiths as they navigate through lifes's challenges - illness, aging , finanical uncertainty, mental health concerns, family problems, or personal…

—
8
Franciscan Community Benefit Services

MISSION - TO celebrate life and serve with joy. Vision - to provide access to Catholic high schools and offer programs for higher education and career readiness for young women from the Chicago area.

Religion
9
Kinship Mke Inc

Kinship Community Food Center engages volunteers and neighborhood residents to end hunger, isolation, and poverty. Our innovative programs nourish food security and wellness, foster belonging and community engagement, and empower stability…

Food & Nutrition
10
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
11
FamilyWise Services

Strengthening families by promoting the safety, stability and wellbeing of children.

Health
12
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Illinois Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Brother Rice High School: $80,000 · OtherBrother Rice High SchoolBr Rice High School: $80,000 · OtherBr Rice High SchoolCristo Rey Jesuit HS: $75,000 · OtherCristo Rey Jesuit HSProvidence St Mel School: $66,000 · OtherProvidence St Mel SchoolCRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $43,000 · OtherCRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLNeighborhood House: $30,000 · OtherNeighborhood HouseSacred Heart Med Ctr Fdtn: $29,000 · OtherSacred Heart Med Ctr FdtnPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherLittle Sisters of the Poor: $20,000 · Other+5 more: $53,000 · Other+5 moreBear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation: $185,000 · HealthBear Necessities Pediatr…ABCD INC: $185,000 · HealthABCD INCMarquette University: $183,000 · EducationMarquette Univers…Pearls for Teen Girls Inc: $65,000 · EducationPearls for Teen G…LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationOZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesOZAUKEE FAMILY …THE HUMANITARIAN SERVICE PROJECT: $69,000 · Human ServicesTHE HUMANITARIA…Bartow Family Resources Inc: $55,000 · Human ServicesBartow Family R…NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD HO…NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $142,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN …FAMILY SHARING OF OZAUKEE COUNTY INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $57,000 · PhilanthropyCHICAGO LIGHTS: $40,000 · PhilanthropyROSIE'S PLACE INC: $66,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$526,000Health$370,000Education$263,000Human Services$234,000Food & Nutrition$147,000Philanthropy$97,000Housing & Shelter$66,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation: $185,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetABCD INC: $185,000 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetMarquette University: $183,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $142,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES INC: $80,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetTHE HUMANITARIAN SERVICE PROJECT: $69,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetProvidence St Mel School: $66,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $66,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPearls for Teen Girls Inc: $65,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $57,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBartow Family Resources Inc: $55,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCHICAGO LIGHTS: $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVilla Siena: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ABCD INC ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANITARIAN SERVICE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Providence St Mel School ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Pearls for Teen Girls Inc ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bartow Family Resources Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO LIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Villa Siena ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SHARING OF OZAUKEE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dr Scholl FoundationIL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dr Scholl Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wakerly Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wakerly Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wakerly Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph