Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wakerly Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$311k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Education$474kHealth$379kHuman Services$123kFood & Nutrition$117kYouth Development$90kInternational$64kHousing & Shelter$51kPhilanthropy$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Brother Rice High School$40,000
ABCD Inc$35,000
Bear Necessities$30,000
Marquette University$30,000
Ozaukee Family Services$20,000
Cristo Rey Jesuit High School$20,000
Northern Illinois Food Bank$20,000
Bartow Family Resources$15,000
Sacred Heart Medical Center Foundation$15,000
Bear Necessities$15,000
Rosie's Place$15,000
Providence St Mel School$12,000
New Horizons Foundation$12,000
Humanitarian Service Project$12,000
Neighborhood House of Milwaukee$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $159k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Ozaukee Family Services: $20k → 6%Bartow Family Resources: $15k → 10%Humanitarian Service Project: $12k → 7%Ozaukee Family Services: $20k → 6%Bartow Family Resources: $10k → 10%Humanitarian Service Project: $12k → 7%Ozaukee Family Services: $10k → 6%Bartow Family Resources: $10k → 10%Humanitarian Service Project: $10k → 7%Ozaukee Family Services: $10k → 6%Humanitarian Service Project: $10k → 7%Humanitarian Service Project: $10k → 7%Neighborhood House of Milwaukee: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 15 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$1.2M
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+19%

Still filing today

73%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BN
    Bear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $185k · revenue +14%
  • MU
    Marquette University
    5× · 2021–2025 · $150k · revenue +16%
  • ABCD INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $150k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • SL
    SUSTAINABLE LIVING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

2
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
3
Joliet Area Community Hospice Corp

The mission of the lightways hospice and serious illness care is to provide comprehensive, holistic, community based support services and care for terminally ill persons, their caregivers and loved ones without regard to economic status,…

Human Services
4
The Family Institute

Our mission is to strengthen and heal families and individuals from all walks of life through clinical service, education and research.

5
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
6
Planned Parenthood North Central States Foundation

To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.

Human Services
7
Franciscan Community Benefit Services

MISSION - TO celebrate life and serve with joy. Vision - to provide access to Catholic high schools and offer programs for higher education and career readiness for young women from the Chicago area.

Religion
8
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
9
The Women's Resource of Greater Houston

See Schedule OThe Women's Resource of Greater Houston helps women and girls make choices toward becoming independent, productive, and financially stable. We fulfill our mission by recruiting volunteer instructors to deliver our programs in…

Philanthropy
10
St Jude House Inc

MISSION - ST. JUDE HOUSE, Inc. (St. Jude House) IS a family violence prevention center and shelter; our mission is TO CELEBRATE LIFE AND SERVE WITH JOY. Vision - St. Jude House is a catalyst in Northwest Indiana for the prevention,…

Housing & Shelter
11
The Village At Mercy Creek

The Mission of The Villas at Mercy Creek is to Celebrate Life and Serve with Joy.

Housing & Shelter
12
Resurrection University

Resurrection University (dba Oak Point University) inspires, educates and forms life-long learners who meet the world's changing needs with curiosity, ingenuity and grace.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New Horizons Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Br Rice High School — $80,000 · OtherBr Rice High SchoolCristo Rey Jesuit HS — $75,000 · OtherCristo Rey Jesuit HSProvidence St Mel School — $54,000 · OtherProvidence St Mel SchoolBrother Rice High School — $40,000 · OtherBrother Rice High SchoolNeighborhood House — $30,000 · OtherNeighborhood HouseSacred Heart Med Ctr Fdtn — $29,000 · OtherSacred Heart Med Ctr FdtnIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL — $20,000 · OtherSacred Heart Medical Center Foundation — $15,000 · Other+4 more — $38,000 · Other+4 moreBear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation — $185,000 · HealthBear Necessities Pediatric C…ABCD INC — $150,000 · HealthABCD INCMarquette University — $150,000 · EducationMarquette Univer…Pearls for Teen Girls Inc — $50,000 · EducationPearls for Teen …OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesOZAUKEE FAMIL…THE HUMANITARIAN SERVICE PROJECT — $54,000 · Human ServicesTHE HUMANITAR…Bartow Family Resources Inc — $35,000 · Human ServicesBartow Family…NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD …NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $117,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN …CHICAGO LIGHTS — $40,000 · PhilanthropyThe New Horizons Foundation Inc — $32,000 · PhilanthropyROSIE'S PLACE INC — $51,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$406,000Health$335,000Education$200,000Human Services$159,000Food & Nutrition$117,000Philanthropy$72,000Housing & Shelter$51,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation — $185,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetMarquette University — $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetABCD INC — $150,000 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $117,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES INC — $60,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetProvidence St Mel School — $54,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HUMANITARIAN SERVICE PROJECT — $54,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC — $51,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPearls for Teen Girls Inc — $50,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCHICAGO LIGHTS — $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBartow Family Resources Inc — $35,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc — $32,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVilla Siena — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation
  • Who funds Marquette University
  • Who funds ABCD INC
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds Providence St Mel School
  • Who funds THE HUMANITARIAN SERVICE PROJECT
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC
  • Who funds Pearls for Teen Girls Inc
  • Who funds CHICAGO LIGHTS
  • Who funds Bartow Family Resources Inc
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC
  • Who funds Villa Siena

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dr Scholl FoundationIL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dr Scholl Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wakerly Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Rosie's Place Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph