Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wagon Mountain Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$189kFood & Nutrition$141kHuman Services$131kEnvironment$115kHealth$90kInternational$80kCommunity Improvement$30kReligion$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$642k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POVERELLO CENTER INC$8,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$7,000
MISSOULA FOOD BANK$6,000
CDNA$5,000
MONTANA FOODBANK NETWORK$5,000
SOFT LANDING MISSOULA$5,000
FIVE VALLEYS LAND TRUST$4,250
GARDEN CITY HARVEST$3,500
MISSOULA YOUTH HOMES$3,000
WATSONS CHILDREN SHELTER$3,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD MISSOULA$3,000
MISSOULA INTERFAITH COLLABORATIVE - FAMILY PROMISE$3,000
YWCA SERVICE CENTERDOMESTIC VIOLENCE$3,000
MISSOULA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,500
HOMEWORD$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WATSON CHILDRENS SHELTER: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$754k · 23 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +52% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
11

Total granted

$754k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+52%

Still filing today

70%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterInternationalHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    POVERELLO CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $81k · revenue +122%
  • FV
    FIVE VALLEYS LAND TRUST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +132%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $61k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MISSOULA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +19%
  • PI
    PARTNERS IN HEALTH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • YF
    YWCA FAMILY EMERGENCY CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mountain Home Montana Inc

To provide a safe, stable , and nurturing home where young mothers can discover their strengths, and their children can experience the joys of childhood.

Human Services
2
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
3
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
4
Partnership Health Center Inc

Partnership health center ensures that accessible, comprehensive primary healthcare is provided to the medically underserved population in our region, through a partnership of community resources.

—
5
Montana Wildlife Federation

The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.

Animals
6
Montana Conservation Corps Inc

Montana Conservation Corps (MCC) inspires young people through hands-on conservation service to be leaders, stewards of the land and engaged citizens who improve their communities.

Civil Rights
7
Montana Land to Hand

Land to hand's mission is to build a strong community food system that fosters socially just ways of accessing food. we accomplish this mission through our food access and education programs.

Food & Nutrition
8
Mountainlands Community Housing Associat

Mountainlands community housing association's (mcha) purpose is based on the belief that a safe affordable home is often a family's first step toward economic self-sufficiency. mcha addresses the dual problems of housing affordability and…

Unclassified
9
Missoula Community Foundation

To enhance community vitality by inspiring community giving and strengthening nonprofits

Community Improvement
10
Missoula Electric Cooperative Inc

Missoula Electric Cooperative, Inc. strives to uphold a commitment to service excellence, while delivering safe, affordable and reliable electricty to its members.

—
11
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Montana

Keeping families with a sick child/children close to the care and resources they need, when it matters the most.

Health
12
Montana Indigenous Food Sovereignty Initiative

To collaborate with people across the state on local, regenerative, and culturally specific food systems that aim to protect, cultivate, distribute, and increase access to indigenous foods through the exchange of knowledge, skills, and…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Poverello Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSOULA AGING SERVICES: $35,500 · OtherMISSOULA AGING SERVICESWATSONS CHILDREN SHELTER: $35,000 · OtherWATSONS CHILDREN SHELTERPLANNED PARENTHOOD MISSOULA: $35,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD MISSOULAMISSOULA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $32,500 · OtherMISSOULA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYYWCA SERVICE CENTERDOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $25,500 · OtherYWCA SERVICE CENTERDOMESTIC VIOLENCEMISSOULA AIDS FUNDS INC DBA OPEN AID ALLIANCE: $22,000 · OtherMISSOULA AIDS FUNDS INC DBA OPEN AID ALL…Individual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherCDNA: $10,000 · OtherBLUE MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC: $18,000 · OtherBLUE MOUNTAIN CLINIC INCMISSOULA INTERFAITH COLLABORATIVE: $17,000 · OtherMISSOULA INTERFAITH COLLABORATIVE+12 more: $44,500 · Other+12 moreMISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $50,000 · Food & NutritionMISSOULA FOOD BANK…MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC: $46,000 · Food & NutritionMONTANA FOOD BANK …GARDEN CITY HARVEST INC: $38,500 · Food & NutritionGARDEN CITY HARVES…POVERELLO CENTER INC: $81,000 · Housing & ShelterPOVERELLO CENTER…HOMEWORD INC: $35,500 · Housing & ShelterHOMEWORD INCFIVE VALLEYS LAND TRUST: $63,750 · EnvironmentFIVE VALLEYS LAN…CLARK FORK COALITION: $31,000 · EnvironmentCLARK FORK COALI…SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIR…GLACIER INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentGLACIER INSTITUT…Save The Children Federation Inc: $61,000 · InternationalSave The C…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,000 · InternationalMEDECINS S…YOUTH HOMES: $40,000 · Human ServicesWATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NETWORK OF THE AMERICAS: $30,000 · Community Improvement
Other$287,500Food & Nutrition$134,500Housing & Shelter$116,500Environment$114,750International$75,000Human Services$45,000Community Improvement$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPOVERELLO CENTER INC: $81,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetFIVE VALLEYS LAND TRUST: $63,750 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $61,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $50,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC: $46,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH HOMES: $40,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGARDEN CITY HARVEST INC: $38,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHOMEWORD INC: $35,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCLARK FORK COALITION: $31,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NETWORK OF THE AMERICAS: $30,000 over 6y, 25% of budgetMISSOULA AIDS FUNDS INC DBA OPEN AID ALLIANCE: $22,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC: $18,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMISSOULA INTERFAITH COLLABORATIVE: $17,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLACIER INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MISSOULA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds POVERELLO CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FIVE VALLEYS LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH HOMES ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWORD INC ↗
  • Who funds CLARK FORK COALITION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NETWORK OF THE AMERICAS ↗
  • Who funds MISSOULA AIDS FUNDS INC DBA OPEN AID ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds BLUE MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOULA INTERFAITH COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds GLACIER INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MISSOULA INC ↗
  • Who funds WATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM GARDENS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT24.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Headwaters Health Foundation of Western Montana · Otto Bremer Trust · Missoula Community Foundation · The Llewellyn Foundation · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Sample Foundation Inc · The Thendara Foundation · Treacy Foundation · Voice Foundation · United Way of Missoula County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wagon Mountain Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wagon Mountain Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wagon Mountain’s filings →

More from the funding graph