Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wade a and Ruby O Wallinger Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$64kHuman Services$54kEducation$36kHealth$35kCommunity Improvement$13kFood & Nutrition$7kHousing & Shelter$7kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY COMFORTER CHURCH$50,000
FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN$5,000
SOUTH PACIFIC COUNTY HUMANE SOCIIET$5,000
THE HIVE FOUNDATION$5,000
VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER$5,000
NEW HORIZONS OF NW FL$4,000
HOLY COMFORTER LUTHER CHURCH$3,000
LUTHERHILL MINISTRIES$2,000
YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON$2,000
KINGWOOD ROBOTICS BOOSTER CLUB$2,000
HAAM$2,000
NONPAREIL INSTITUTE$2,000
STAR OF HOPE MISSION$2,000
HUMBLE ISD FOUNDATION$1,040
REASON FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $2k → 16%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $125 → 19%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $2k → 16%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $125 → 19%YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON: $6k → 16%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $105 → 19%YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON: $5k → 16%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $103 → 19%YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON: $5k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON: $5k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON: $5k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON: $2k → 16%VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 16%VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 16%LAKE HOUSTON FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 16%VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 16%VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 16%VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 16%VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER INC: $650 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
OR
SD
OH
CA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$163k · 19 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$163k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+39%

Still filing today

58%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +103%
  • SM
    SHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +362%
  • TA
    The Arc Gateway Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • CR
    COLUMBIA RIVER INTER-TRIBAL FISH CO
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • RO
    RMHC OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Special Olympics Washington

Mission: to provide inclusive sports, health, and leadership programs that enable individuals with idd to develop skills, improve health, and participate fully in their communities.vision: to be the leading organization in washington state…

—
2
Special Olympics Wisconsin Inc

The mission of special olympics wisconsin, inc. is to provide year-round sports training and athletic competition in a variety of olympic-type sports for children and adults with intellectual disabilities, giving them continuing…

Recreation & Sports
3
People with Disabilities Succeeding

Community support for Developmentally Disabled Adults, with a main emphasis on helping people to obtain and maintain real jobs in local businesses.

Employment
4
Occupational Development Center Inc

To develop the skills of individuals with abilities by providing opportunities for suitable, sustainable employment that result in greater independence. Individuals with abilities to be engaged in valuable work, integrated into their…

Employment
5
South Peninsula Behavioral Health Services Inc

The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…

Health
6
Job Options Inc

To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.

Employment
7
Spectrum for Living Development Inc

To enable individuals who have developmental and/or physical disabilities to have the opportunity to attain their highest level of skills, purpose and independence.

Human Services
8
Special Olympics Missouri Inc

Through year-round sports and training, individuals with intellectual disabilities are given the chance to gain confidence, seek opportunities to improve their physical fitness, demonstrate pride, and participate in their communities.

—
9
Developing Potential Inc

Operation of a Facility for training the severely handicapped to increase thier earning capabilities and to increase opportunities for health and wellness.

Employment
10
Summerhouse Houston

Summerhouse Houston's supports adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), their familites, and our community through employment, volunterism, and partnerships to foster a culture of belonging, choice and respect.

Human Services
11
The Whole Person Inc

The Whole Person connects people with disabilities to the resources they need by supporting independent choice and advocating for positive change in the community.

—
12
Special Olympics Michigan Inc

The special olympics movement uses sport as a vehicle for acceptance, respect, inclusion, dignity, and joy. we provide year-round sports training and competition for children and adults with intellectual disabilities.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star of Hope Mission; the most unlike its peers is Ocean Park Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY COMFORTER CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherHOLY COMFORTER CHURCHHOLY COMFORTER SCHOOL: $33,092 · OtherHOLY COMFORTER SCHOOLNEW HORIZONS OF NW FL: $13,000 · OtherNEW HORIZONS OF NW FLSHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 · OtherSHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDRENTHE HIVE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherTHE HIVE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherTEXAS-LOUISIANA GULF COAST SYNOD OUTDOOR & RETREAT MINISTRIES INC: $6,000 · OtherHOLY COMFORTER LUTHER CHURCH: $6,000 · Other+17 more: $35,155 · Other+17 moreYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area: $32,500 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Associat…THE VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER INC: $25,650 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER IN…PENINSULA POVERTY RESPONSE PPR: $5,000 · Human ServicesPENINSULA POVERTY RESPONSE PPRNONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $4,000 · Human ServicesNONPAREIL INSTITUTE+1 more: $458 · Human ServicesSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsPedal with Pete Inc: $2,250 · PhilanthropyOCEAN PARK FOOD BANK: $2,000 · Food & NutritionTHE REASON FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Education
Other$171,247Human Services$67,608Housing & Shelter$4,000Recreation & Sports$3,000Philanthropy$2,250Food & Nutrition$2,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area: $32,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER INC: $25,650 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPENINSULA POVERTY RESPONSE PPR: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetNONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Arc Gateway Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPedal with Pete Inc: $2,250 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetOCEAN PARK FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE REASON FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc: $458 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT: $450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Olympics Oregon Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area ↗
  • Who funds THE VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA POVERTY RESPONSE PPR ↗
  • Who funds NONPAREIL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds The Arc Gateway Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Pedal with Pete Inc ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN PARK FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE REASON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIBLEPROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds Special Olympics Oregon Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wade a and Ruby O Wallinger Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wade a and Ruby O Wallinger Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Arc Gateway Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wade a and Ruby O Wallinger’s filings →

More from the funding graph