· Private foundation
Wachsman Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YESHIVA TORAS MENACHEM | $12,000 |
| CONGREGATION RAMAT SCHLOMO | $5,000 |
| YESHIVAS MIR YERUSHALAYIM | $4,000 |
| SMALL CHARITY AMOUNTS- LESS THAN 1500 | $3,100 |
| BINYAN TORAH INC | $2,400 |
| FRIENDS OF BRISKER YESHIVA | $2,000 |
| BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA | $1,945 |
| CONGREGATION CHASIDEI BOBOV | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.
22 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- BMB M G6× · 2017–2022 · $72k
- BDBnos Devorah3× · 2018–2020 · $40k
- YTYESHIVA TORAS MENACHEM2× · 2023–2024 · $22k
Funded once
- CACong Ahavas Tzedukah Vochesedone grant, 2017 · $14k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $12k
- MKMESIVTA KEREN ORAHgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +37%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.
Religious Teaching
Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…
To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.
Operation of a parochial elementary school, providing education services to students
To provide religious Jewish education.
Provide a building for a religious school.
Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students
Yeshiva toras aron is a religious elementary school providing quality education for grades k-8 for the children of lakewood nj.
Parochial secondary school.
How this is measured
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Sorala Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · The R & S Family Foundation Inc · The Weiskopf Family Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Wachsman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wachsman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Mesivta Keren Orah: 10% of income from government
- Bais Tova Inc: 7% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Wachsman Family’s filings →