Skip to content

· Private foundation

W Moreland & Ruth U Ernst Char

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$191kHealth$111kYouth Development$52kReligion$43kAnimals$29kPublic Benefit$29kPhilanthropy$23kEducation$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$2,765
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$13,345
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$3,416
FAMILY GUIDANCE INC$3,416
GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES$3,416
ANIMAL FRIENDS INC$3,416
Individual grant recipient$2,771
MASONIC CHARITIES FUNDS$2,771
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$2,771
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR EYE FOUNDATION$2,771
SHERWOOD OAKS SUBSIDY FUND$2,771
PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE FDN$2,771
DEMOLAY FOUNDATION$2,765
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$2,765
CRANBERRY COMMUNITY UNITED PRESBYTERIAN$1,468
THE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION$1,468
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MARS HOME FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%FAMILY GUIDANCE INC: $3k → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $4k → 9%MARS HOME FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%FAMILY GUIDANCE INC: $3k → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%MARS HOME FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%FAMILY GUIDANCE INC: $3k → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%MARS HOME FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%MARS HOME FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%MARS HOME FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%MARS HOME FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $3k → 9%MARS HOME FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%MARS HOME FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%FAMILY GUIDANCE INC: $4k → 9%FAMILY GUIDANCE INC: $3k → 9%FAMILY GUIDANCE INC: $3k → 9%FAMILY GUIDANCE INC: $3k → 9%FAMILY GUIDANCE INC: $3k → 9%FAMILY GUIDANCE INC: $3k → 9%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $4k → 9%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%THE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%THE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%THE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%THE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%THE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%THE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%THE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%THE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%THE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
MO
MD
TN
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$539k · 27 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against -100% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
4

Total granted

$539k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-100%

Still filing today

52%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    Animal Friends Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +24%
  • GR
    GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +51%
  • FG
    FAMILY GUIDANCE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • PL
    Presbyterian Lay Committee Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -100%
  • RP
    REFORMATION PRESS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • PA
    Pittsburgh Athletic Association
    one grant, 2017 · $163
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Baptist Home of Philadelphia

The mission of the baptist home of philadelphia is dedicated to providing quality continuing care living facilities and support services in a christian environment respecting the dignity and sanctity of all individuals regardless of their…

Human Services
2
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
3
Guardian Foundation Inc

To provide proactive administrative and professionals support services that advance the mission or our affiliated organizations.

—
4
Diakon Lutheran Fund

In response to god's love in jesus christ, diakon lutheran fund will demonstrate god's command to love the neighbor through acts of service.

—
5
Pathlight Inc

Pathlight partners with people with disabilities and their families to create opportunities to build relationships throughout their lives.

—
6
Pennsylvania Builders Association

Incorporated in 1945, the pennsylvania builders association is a nonprofit professional trade organization representing approximately 4,066 members from across the commonwealth. pba members include contractors, builders, and remodelers,…

—
7
Grand Chapter of Pennsylvania Order of the Eastern Star Inc

The purpose of this grand chapter, and the subordinate chapters constituted by and under its authority, is to promote the practice of charity and fraternity, exclusively within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code…

Community Improvement
8
The Arkansas Lighthouse for the Blind Inc

To improve occupational opportunity and public perception of legally blind arkansans through community engagement, work skills enhancement and the production of quality goods and services.

—
9
Presbyterian Homes Housing & Assisted Living Inc

The mission of presbyterian homes housing & assisted living, inc. is to honor god by enriching the lives and touching the hearts of older adults.

Human Services
10
Lancaster General Health Foundation

The lancaster general health foundation is organized and operated to benefit, perform the functions of, or carry out the purposes of members of the healthcare system of lancaster general health, a non-profit corporation described in…

Philanthropy
11
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
12
Geneva Foundation of Presbyterian Homes

The geneva foundation transforms lives by enriching presbyterian living and westminster place communities through generous and responsible philanthropy.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lighthouse Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Bible Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $113,876 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYGRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARITY FOUNDATION: $23,392 · OtherGRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $23,392 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHERWOOD OAKS SUBSIDY FUND: $23,392 · OtherSHERWOOD OAKS SUBSIDY FUNDGLENSHAW PUBLIC LIBRARY: $12,197 · OtherALLEGHENY CEMETERY HIST ASSOC: $12,197 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $12,197 · OtherDUTILH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $12,197 · Other+10 more: $39,384 · Other+10 moreGLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $28,976 · Human ServicesGLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERV…FAMILY GUIDANCE INC: $28,976 · Human ServicesFAMILY GUIDANCE INCGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $28,975 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BL…MARS HOME FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION: $12,197 · Human ServicesMARS HOME FOR YOUTH FOU…THE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION: $12,197 · Human ServicesTHE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATI…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $23,392 · HealthALZHEIMER'S D…KNIGHTS TEMPLAR EYE FOUNDATION: $23,392 · HealthKNIGHTS TEMPL…ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $18,553 · HealthARTHRITIS FOU…Animal Friends Inc: $28,976 · AnimalsPresbyterian Seniorcare Foundation: $23,392 · Housing & ShelterDEMOLAY FOUNDATION INC: $23,380 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $12,197 · ReligionSUPREME COUNCIL EDUCATION & CHARITY: $7,066 · Education
Other$272,224Human Services$111,321Health$65,337Animals$28,976Housing & Shelter$23,392Youth Development$23,380Religion$12,197Education$7,066

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAnimal Friends Inc: $28,976 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $28,976 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY GUIDANCE INC: $28,976 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $28,975 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPresbyterian Seniorcare Foundation: $23,392 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $23,392 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARITY FOUNDATION: $23,392 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetKNIGHTS TEMPLAR EYE FOUNDATION: $23,392 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetDEMOLAY FOUNDATION INC: $23,380 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $18,553 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARS HOME FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION: $12,197 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $12,197 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION: $12,197 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSUPREME COUNCIL EDUCATION & CHARITY: $7,066 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPresbyterian Lay Committee Inc: $2,466 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Animal Friends Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY GUIDANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds Presbyterian Seniorcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KNIGHTS TEMPLAR EYE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DEMOLAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARS HOME FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUPREME COUNCIL EDUCATION & CHARITY ↗
  • Who funds Presbyterian Lay Committee Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization W Moreland & Ruth U Ernst Char funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from W Moreland & Ruth U Ernst Char. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on W Moreland & Ruth U Ernst Char’s filings →

    More from the funding graph