Skip to content

· Private foundation

W E Stone Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$82k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$305kArts & Culture$143kRecreation & Sports$116kPhilanthropy$47kHuman Services$27kHealth$15kYouth Development$14kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$834k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON$15,000
WV INDEPENDENT COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES$15,000
EXPERIENCE LEARNING$10,000
OGLEBAY INSTITUTE$8,000
OGLEBAY FOUNDATION$5,000
WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$5,000
LINSLY SCHOOL$5,000
ARTS AMPLIFIED$5,000
WHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY$5,000
HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER$3,500
ORCHARD PARK HOSPITAL$2,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS$2,000
YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $4k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $4k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $4k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $3k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $3k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $2k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$639k · 18 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against -19% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$639k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
-19%

Still filing today

72%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +13%
  • OF
    OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +284%
  • OI
    OGLEBAY INSTITUTE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $57k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • WC
    WVICU CIRCLE OF VISION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • TL
    THE LIFE HUB WV
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • WJ
    WHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Virginia Wesleyan University

Virginia wesleyan university is a fully accredited liberal arts, united-methodist related institution founded in 1961.

—
2
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
3
The Wheeler School

Wheeler is an independent, college preparatory day school serving students nursery through grade 12 whose mission is derived from the ideal of its founder, mary c wheeler, "to learn our powers and be answerable for their use."

Education
4
Waynesburg University

Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…

Education
5
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
6
Wilmington University Inc

Wilmington university is committed to excellence in teaching, relevancy of the curriculum, and individual attention to students. as an institution with admissions policies that provide access for all, it offers opportunity for higher…

Education
7
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

—
8
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
9
West Virginia Wesleyan College

West virginia wesleyan college challenges its students to a life-long commitment to develop their intellectual, ethical, spiritual, and leadership potential and to set and uphold standards of excellence. firmly rooted in the liberal arts…

Education
10
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
11
Oberlin College

Oberlin College and Conservatory educate students for lives of intellectual, musical and artistic rigor and breadth, sustained inquiry, creativity and innovation, and leadership. Oberlin aims to prepare graduates with the knowledge,…

Education
12
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nami National. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WV INDEPENDENT COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES: $120,000 · OtherWV INDEPENDENT COLLEGES & UNIVERSITI…THE UNITY CENTER: $20,000 · OtherTHE UNITY CENTERCHARLESTON FUND FOR THE ARTS: $17,500 · OtherCHARLESTON FUND FOR THE ARTSWVICU CIRCLE OF VISION: $15,000 · OtherWVICU CIRCLE OF VISIONARTS AMPLIFIED INC: $10,000 · OtherORCHARD PARK HOSPITAL: $8,000 · Other+6 more: $28,500 · Other+6 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $65,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON I…WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $56,000 · EducationWHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLTHE LINSLY SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $37,000 · EducationTHE LINSLY SCHOOL INCORPORATEDBETHANY COLLEGE: $22,000 · EducationBETHANY COLLEGE+1 more: $5,200 · EducationOGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsOGLEBAY FOUNDATION …EXPERIENCE LEARNING INC: $55,500 · Recreation & SportsEXPERIENCE LEARNING…OGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $57,000 · EnvironmentOGLEBAY I…UNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC: $42,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyWHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $10,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $8,500 · Human Services
Other$219,000Education$185,200Recreation & Sports$115,500Environment$57,000Philanthropy$47,000Arts & Culture$40,000Human Services$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $65,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetOGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $57,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetWHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $56,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetEXPERIENCE LEARNING INC: $55,500 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC: $42,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetWHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $40,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LINSLY SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $37,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY COLLEGE: $22,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $10,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC: $5,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Mountain Institute Inc: $4,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGROW OHIO VALLEY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC ↗
  • Who funds OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OGLEBAY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds EXPERIENCE LEARNING INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LINSLY SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Mountain Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds GROW OHIO VALLEY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Driehorst Family FoundationWV24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Driehorst Family Foundation · Hess Family Foundation · Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation · Stamp 2001 Charitable Fund · Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Eqt Foundation · Helen J Prince Foundation Security National Trust Co Trustee · Stamp Charitable Fund · James B Chambers Memorial

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization W E Stone Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from W E Stone Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to W E Stone Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to W E Stone Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on W E Stone’s filings →

    More from the funding graph