Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

W & a Soneson Scholarship Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$324kCommunity Improvement$9kArts & Culture$3kHealth$3kRecreation & Sports$2kFood & Nutrition$375
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$523k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF MN DULUTH$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN ST PAUL$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIRE$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES$2,000
MANKATO STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STOUT$2,000
ELMHURST UNIVERSITY$2,000
GRINNELL COLLEGE$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 90% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN ST PAUL: $4k → 14%KARIN BERDAHL AND DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%MANKATO STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%BEMIDJI STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 17%GRINNELL COLLEGE: $2k → 9%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 10%NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIRE: $4k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN- MADISON: $1k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN- STOUT: $2k → 11%ELMHURST UNIVERSITY: $4k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MN DULUTH: $4k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $4k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STOUT: $2k → 11%ELMHURST UNIVERSITY: $2k → 7%DULUTH SUPERIOR AREA COMMUNITY FDN: $2k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STOUT: $2k → 11%DULUTH SUPERIOR AREA COMMUNITY FDN: $2k → 15%DULUTH SUPERIOR AREA COMMUNITY FDN: $2k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH: $2k → 15%COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA: $4k → 15%A GARDEN CENTER: $375 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$296k · 17 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
13

Total granted

$296k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+195%

Still filing today

24%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DRAKE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2019–2023 · $14k · revenue +11%
  • EU
    ELMHURST UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $14k · revenue +23%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • AD
    ALYVIA DOBS & COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • NM
    NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • MS
    MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY MANKATO
    one grant, 2024 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augsburg University

A private lutheran four-year university located in downtown minneapolis.

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Saint mary's university of minnesota is a private catholic institution that serves about 3,900 students annually. the university offers a comprehensive, personalized education guided by its lasallian catholic heritage. with a wide array of…

Education
3
St Mary's University

To foster the formation of people in faith and educate leaders for the common good through community, education, and academic excellence. see schedule o.

4
The Associates of the University

The Organization's mission is to accept donations from sources within the United States for the benefit of the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

5
California Lutheran University

Clu is an institution offering undergraduate and graduate degrees in the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
6
University of Minnesota Alumni Association

Connecting alumni, students, and friends in support of the university of minnesota and each other.

7
Northcentral University

The organization is a post-secondary level educational institution.

8
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover share knowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and develop leadership expressed in service to others.

Education
9
University of New Haven

University of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education
10
Nebraska Wesleyan University

An academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within a christian environment.

Education
11
DePauw University

DePauw is a nationally-recognized, leading liberal arts college committed to creating an atmosphere of intellectual challenge & engagement that prepares students for lifelong success.

Education
12
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minnesota State University Mankato Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Northern Michigan University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA — $54,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAUNIVERSITY OF MN DULUTH — $45,250 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MN DULUTHUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON — $28,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISONGRINNELL COLLEGE — $16,000 · OtherGRINNELL COLLEGEELMHURST UNIVERSITY — $14,000 · OtherELMHURST UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN — $10,000 · Other+21 more — $78,178 · Other+21 moreCOLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC — $61,250 · EducationCOLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA IN…DRAKE UNIVERSITY — $14,000 · EducationDRAKE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL — $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN -…DULUTH-SUPERIOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $8,817 · Philanthropy
Other$246,428Education$85,250Philanthropy$8,817

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC — $61,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY — $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetELMHURST UNIVERSITY — $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDULUTH-SUPERIOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $8,817 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC
  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ELMHURST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL
  • Who funds DULUTH-SUPERIOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds University of Michigan

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization W & a Soneson Scholarship Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph