Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Vmt Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$17kEducation$4kHealth$4kAnimals$2kFood & Nutrition$2kYouth Development$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$750
Median grant
3
States reached
$78k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDSAFE$3,000
DENVER RESCUE MISSION$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$750
WOUNDER WARRIOR PROJECT$750
ECHO$500
EVERGREEN ANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $900 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
CA
CO
KS
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$24k · 12 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$24k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+20%

Still filing today

42%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DR
    DENVER RESCUE MISSION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +26%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +24%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • RM
    RUBY M SISSON MEMORIAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • EA
    EVERGREEN ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +20%
  • BE
    BRENT ELEY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Good Dog Rescue

To save dogs from high kill shelters and place them into loving foster homes. Prior to adoption our dogs will be vetted, spayed or neutered and nurtured to join a supportive and loving home environment.

Animals
2
Pueblo Spay & Neuter Now

Mission Statement: Pueblo Spay and Neuter Now is committed to supporting existing spay and neuter operations aiding pet parents in need and hosting pop-up and mobile clinics with the goal of making a lasting impact on pet overpopulation…

Animals
3
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Northern Nv

Our mission is to be an innovative regional leader in responsible treatment of homeless dogs and cats, primarily through their rescue and placement in forever loving homes and by promoting spaying and neutering to control pet…

Unclassified
4
Humane Society Silicon Valley

At humane society silicon valley, our mission is to save lives, keep families together, and create a better future for pets and their people.(see schedule o for continuation)

Animals
5
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
6
Noco Humane

Our mission is to further the compassionate safe and responsible relationship between animals and people.

Animals
7
Sweet Dreams Senior Pet Sanctuary

The mission of sweet dreams senior pet sanctuary is to support elderly individuals who can no longer care for their senior pets by providing a safe and loving home for their cherished companions. the sanctuary offers two primary programs…

Animals
8
Dogs Unbroken

Dog Rescue Dogs Unbroken supports Colorado dogs at higher risk for euthanasia evaluating their behavioral stability and applying training methods appropriate for their needs. The goal of helping each dog learn to make good choices in…

Animals
9
Juneau Animal Rescue

To serve our community by promoting animal welfare and strengthening the animal-human bond. to improve the lives of pets through education and protection. to shelter stray, abandoned, and surrendered pets and find them loving homes.

Animals
10
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
11
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
12
Humane Society of Fremontcounty Inc

Operate as an open-admission animal shelter dedicated to helping every animal in need. provide animals in need with a safe and loving home until they find their forever home.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is Ruby M Sisson Memorial Library Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILDSAFE — $3,000 · OtherCHILDSAFEMOUNT SAINT VINCENT — $3,000 · OtherMOUNT SAINT VINCENTSMILE TRAIN INC — $2,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCSALVATION ARMY — $2,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYMAKE A WISH — $1,800 · OtherMAKE A WISHTHE SALVATION ARMY — $1,450 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYECHO — $1,000 · OtherWOUNDER WARRIOR PROJECT — $750 · Other+4 more — $1,200 · Other+4 moreDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $4,500 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCUE MISSIONWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,900 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJEC…RUBY M SISSON MEMORIAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Community ImprovementFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $1,750 · Food & NutritionHUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS — $1,000 · AnimalsEVERGREEN ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE — $500 · AnimalsBRENT ELEY FOUNDATION — $500 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $300 · Health
Other$19,200Human Services$6,400Community Improvement$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,750Animals$1,500Health$800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRUBY M SISSON MEMORIAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVERGREEN ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRENT ELEY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds RUBY M SISSON MEMORIAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS
  • Who funds EVERGREEN ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE
  • Who funds BRENT ELEY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vmt Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph