Skip to content
Vivent Health Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Vivent Health Inc

Vision: vivent health envisions an end to the hiv/aids epidemic.mission: to end hiv/aids by providing integrated, personalized, judgment-free healthcare, social services, and effective prevention strategies.

$7.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$2.7MHousing & Shelter$342kCivil Rights$187kEducation$79kHuman Services$50kArts & Culture$15k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $112,755, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,070,037 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,957,282 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$235M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL AIDS MEMORIAL FUND$50,000
VIVENT HEALTH ENDOWMENT$30,000
MILWAUKEE PRIDE INC$25,000
KC PRIDE$7,755
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 14 repeat orgs$792k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
17

Total granted

$2.4M
$762k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+28%

Still filing today

86%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCivil RightsHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2023 · $928k · revenue +44%
  • TR
    THE RODNEY SCHEEL HOUSE FOUNDATION LTD
    7× · 2017–2024 · $234k · revenue +13%
  • PT
    Project Transitions Inc
    2× · 2022–2024 · $151k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • AIDS UNITED
    one grant, 2019 · $300k · revenue -53%
  • KC
    Kansas City CARE Clinicgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $59k · revenue +176%
  • PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainbow Health Minnesota

To work for equitable health care access and outcomes for people who experience injustice at the intersection of health status and identity.

Health
2
The Philadelphia Center

Hiv/aids counseling/assistance

—
3
Community Aids NetworkAkron Pride Initi

The organization's mission is to prevent further transmission of HIV through education and risk reduction efforts and to provide housing assistance and other supportive services to people already affected by HIV.

Human Services
4
Health Connections Incorporated

The organization is dedicated to the practice of primary health care and health-related social care coordination. Although our goal is to provide services for all of the greater Milwaukee area, this is a

Health
5
African American Aids Policy and Training Institute

The organization's primary mission is to stop the aids epidemic in black communities by engaging and mobilizing black institutions and individuals in efforts to confront hiv.

Health
6
Men's Health Foundation

Men's health foundation connects men at risk to comprehensive healthcare and wellness through education, collaboration, and advocacy, inspiring and empowering all men to live longer, healthier, and happier lives.

Health
7
The Damien Center Inc

The damien center's mission is to be a trusted partner in providing comprehensive health care, education, and services for all people living with or at risk for hiv and any person seeking a safe and welcoming home for care.

Human Services
8
Gay Men's Health Crisis Inc

Over 9,000 clients are served by gmhc's programs each year. gmhc provides a broad array of programs through the efforts of clinicians, trained volunteers, and professional staff who identify undiagnosed cases on hiv, ensure access and…

Health
9
Outfront Minnesota Community Services

Outfront's mission is to create a state where lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (lgbtq) people are free to be who they are, love who they love, and live without fear of violence, harassment or discrimination. in our effort to…

—
10
Aids Foundation Houston Inc

Allies in hope (aih), formerly known as aids foundation houston, inc. (afh), is a nonprofit corporation founded in 1982 and was among texas' first organizations dedicated to hiv prevention education and services. aih provides stabilizing…

Health
11
Harlem United Community Aids Center Inc

Harlem united provides healthcare, supportive housing and prevention services to persons living with or at risk for aids or hiv related illnesses and other chronic conditions.

Health
12
Housing Works Inc

Housing works is a vibrant, healing community of people living with and affected by hiv/aids. our mission is to end the dual crises of homelessness and aids through relentless advocacy, the provision of lifesaving services, and…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aids United; the most unlike its peers is Harris-Stowe Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $928,303 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYAIDS UNITED: $300,000 · EducationAIDS UNITEDTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $44,000 · Education+2 more: $40,000 · EducationNational AIDS Memorial Inc: $275,000 · HealthNational AIDS Memorial…University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation Inc: $136,622 · HealthUniversity of Wisconsi…COMMON GROUND MINISTRY INC: $96,302 · HealthCOMMON GROUND MINISTRY…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $50,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF …AIDS PROJECT OF THE OZARKS: $49,125 · HealthAIDS PROJECT OF THE OZ…VIVENT HEALTH ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $30,000 · Health+3 more: $42,581 · Health+3 moreBLACK HEALTH COALITION OF WISCONSIN: $243,223 · OtherBLACK HEALTH COALITION OF…Project Transitions Inc: $150,877 · OtherProject Transitions IncDIVERSE AND RESILIENT: $64,172 · OtherDIVERSE AND RESILIENTKansas City CARE Clinic: $58,926 · OtherKansas City CARE ClinicAUSTIN PRIDE: $35,500 · OtherRUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $50,000 · OtherRUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY …MOTHER KATHRYN DANIELS CONFERENCE CENTER INC: $50,000 · OtherMOTHER KATHRYN DANIELS CO…+6 more: $91,000 · Other+6 moreTHE RODNEY SCHEEL HOUSE FOUNDATION LTD: $234,452 · Housing & ShelterCREAM CITY FOUNDATION INC: $170,000 · PhilanthropyMILWAUKEE PRIDE INC: $121,000 · Civil RightsKANSAS CITY PRIDE COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $25,255 · Civil RightsPride St Louis Inc: $22,000 · Civil RightsPATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC: $50,000 · Human Services
Education$1,312,303Health$679,630Other$743,698Housing & Shelter$234,452Philanthropy$170,000Civil Rights$168,255Human Services$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $928,303 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS UNITED: $300,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNational AIDS Memorial Inc: $275,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetBLACK HEALTH COALITION OF WISCONSIN: $243,223 over 4y, 48% of budgetTHE RODNEY SCHEEL HOUSE FOUNDATION LTD: $234,452 over 7y, 15% of budgetCREAM CITY FOUNDATION INC: $170,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetProject Transitions Inc: $150,877 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetUniversity of Wisconsin Medical Foundation Inc: $136,622 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PRIDE INC: $121,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetCOMMON GROUND MINISTRY INC: $96,302 over 7y, 23% of budgetKansas City CARE Clinic: $58,926 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAIDS PROJECT OF THE OZARKS: $49,125 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $44,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVIVENT HEALTH ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $30,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetKANSAS CITY PRIDE COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $25,255 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetPride St Louis Inc: $22,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHill Country Ride for AIDS Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMETROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHarris-Stowe Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetSpectrum Health Care: $16,081 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE-GROUP: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL & TRANSGEND COMMUNITY CENTER OF COLORADO: $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINTERFAITH RESIDENCE D/B/A DOORWAYS: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Fou…United Way of Greater…Broadway Caresequity …Green Bay Packers Fou…Baird Foundation IncWindhover Foundation …Milwaukee Jewish Fede…Wells Fargo FoundationEnterprise Holdings F…Mightycause Charitabl…Charities Aid Foundat…Ge Aerospace Foundati…
Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI20.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Broadway Caresequity Fights AIDS Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Windhover Foundation Inc · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vivent Health Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vivent Health Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vivent Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home