· Public charity
Vivent Health Inc
Vision: vivent health envisions an end to the hiv/aids epidemic.mission: to end hiv/aids by providing integrated, personalized, judgment-free healthcare, social services, and effective prevention strategies.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $112,755 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,070,037 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,957,282 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL AIDS MEMORIAL FUND | $50,000 |
| VIVENT HEALTH ENDOWMENT | $30,000 |
| MILWAUKEE PRIDE INC | $25,000 |
| KC PRIDE | $7,755 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY4× · 2019–2023 · $928k · revenue +44%- TRTHE RODNEY SCHEEL HOUSE FOUNDATION LTD7× · 2017–2024 · $234k · revenue +13%
- PTProject Transitions Inc2× · 2022–2024 · $151k · revenue +16%
Funded once
AIDS UNITEDone grant, 2019 · $300k · revenue -30%- KCKansas City CARE Clinicgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $59k · revenue +176%
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INCone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To work for equitable health care access and outcomes for people who experience injustice at the intersection of health status and identity.
The mission of The AIDS Institute is to promote action for social change through public policy, research, advocacy, and education.
The organization's primary mission is to stop the aids epidemic in black communities by engaging and mobilizing black institutions and individuals in efforts to confront hiv.
Allies in hope (aih), formerly known as aids foundation houston, inc. (afh), is a nonprofit corporation founded in 1982 and was among texas' first organizations dedicated to hiv prevention education and services. aih provides stabilizing…
Hiv/aids counseling/assistance
Over 9,000 clients are served by gmhc's programs each year. gmhc provides a broad array of programs through the efforts of clinicians, trained volunteers, and professional staff who identify undiagnosed cases on hiv, ensure access and…
The organization's mission is to prevent further transmission of HIV through education and risk reduction efforts and to provide housing assistance and other supportive services to people already affected by HIV.
Open Aid Alliance works with the unique potential of each individual to overcome stigma as they seek greater health. Multiple programs work synergistically to carry out our mission and achieve risk reduction goals.
Aidsnet builds healthier communities by planning and funding hiv/aids care and prevention services. aidsnet contracts with agencies in the 6 pa counties of berks, carbon, lehigh, monroe, northampton & schuykill
The aids foundation of chicago mobilizes communities to create equity and justice for people living with and vulnerable to hiv and related chronic disease.
To provide education on the prevention of hiv/aids and to provide comprehensive support services to those affected by the disease.
The organization is dedicated to the practice of primary health care and health-related social care coordination. Although our goal is to provide services for all of the greater Milwaukee area, this is a
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aids United and the most unlike its peers is Harris-Stowe Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AIDS UNITED ↗
- Who funds National AIDS Memorial Inc ↗
- Who funds BLACK HEALTH COALITION OF WISCONSIN ↗
- Who funds THE RODNEY SCHEEL HOUSE FOUNDATION LTD ↗
- Who funds CREAM CITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Project Transitions Inc ↗
- Who funds University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE PRIDE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMON GROUND MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds Kansas City CARE Clinic ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds RUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds MOTHER KATHRYN DANIELS CONFERENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AIDS PROJECT OF THE OZARKS ↗
- Who funds THE UWM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VIVENT HEALTH ENDOWMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY PRIDE COMMUNITY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Pride St Louis Inc ↗
- Who funds Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc ↗
- Who funds HUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Harris-Stowe Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Spectrum Health Care ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE-GROUP ↗
- Who funds GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL & TRANSGEND COMMUNITY CENTER OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH RESIDENCE D/B/A DOORWAYS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Broadway Caresequity Fights AIDS Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Windhover Foundation Inc · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Ge Aerospace Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Vivent Health Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.